Biomass Assessment of Agricultural Crops Using Multi-temporal Dual-Polarimetric TerraSAR-X Data.

Nima Ahmadian, Tobias Ullmann, Jochem Verrelst, Erik Borg, Reinhard Zölitz, Christopher Conrad
{"title":"Biomass Assessment of Agricultural Crops Using Multi-temporal Dual-Polarimetric TerraSAR-X Data.","authors":"Nima Ahmadian,&nbsp;Tobias Ullmann,&nbsp;Jochem Verrelst,&nbsp;Erik Borg,&nbsp;Reinhard Zölitz,&nbsp;Christopher Conrad","doi":"10.1007/s41064-019-00076-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The biomass of three agricultural crops, winter wheat <i>(Triticum aestivum</i> L.), barley <i>(Hordeum vulgare</i> L.), and canola <i>(Brassica napus</i> L.), was studied using multi-temporal dual-polarimetric TerraSAR-X data. The radar backscattering coefficient sigma nought of the two polarization channels HH and VV was extracted from the satellite images. Subsequently, combinations of HH and VV polarizations were calculated (e.g. HH/VV, HH + VV, HH × VV) to establish relationships between SAR data and the fresh and dry biomass of each crop type using multiple stepwise regression. Additionally, the semi-empirical water cloud model (WCM) was used to account for the effect of crop biomass on radar backscatter data. The potential of the Random Forest (RF) machine learning approach was also explored. The split sampling approach (i.e. 70% training and 30% testing) was carried out to validate the stepwise models, WCM and RF. The multiple stepwise regression method using dual-polarimetric data was capable to retrieve the biomass of the three crops, particularly for dry biomass, with <i>R<sup>2</sup></i> > 0.7, without any external input variable, such as information on the (actual) soil moisture. A comparison of the random forest technique with the WCM reveals that the RF technique remarkably outperformed the WCM in biomass estimation, especially for the fresh biomass. For example, the <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> > 0.68 for the fresh biomass estimation of different crop types using RF whereas WCM show <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> < 0.35 only. However, for the dry biomass, the results of both approaches resembled each other.</p>","PeriodicalId":91030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of photogrammetry, remote sensing and geoinformation science","volume":"87 ","pages":"159-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41064-019-00076-x","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of photogrammetry, remote sensing and geoinformation science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-019-00076-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The biomass of three agricultural crops, winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), and canola (Brassica napus L.), was studied using multi-temporal dual-polarimetric TerraSAR-X data. The radar backscattering coefficient sigma nought of the two polarization channels HH and VV was extracted from the satellite images. Subsequently, combinations of HH and VV polarizations were calculated (e.g. HH/VV, HH + VV, HH × VV) to establish relationships between SAR data and the fresh and dry biomass of each crop type using multiple stepwise regression. Additionally, the semi-empirical water cloud model (WCM) was used to account for the effect of crop biomass on radar backscatter data. The potential of the Random Forest (RF) machine learning approach was also explored. The split sampling approach (i.e. 70% training and 30% testing) was carried out to validate the stepwise models, WCM and RF. The multiple stepwise regression method using dual-polarimetric data was capable to retrieve the biomass of the three crops, particularly for dry biomass, with R2 > 0.7, without any external input variable, such as information on the (actual) soil moisture. A comparison of the random forest technique with the WCM reveals that the RF technique remarkably outperformed the WCM in biomass estimation, especially for the fresh biomass. For example, the R 2 > 0.68 for the fresh biomass estimation of different crop types using RF whereas WCM show R 2 < 0.35 only. However, for the dry biomass, the results of both approaches resembled each other.

基于时序双极化TerraSAR-X数据的农作物生物量评估
利用多时段双偏振TerraSAR-X数据研究了冬小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)、大麦(Hordeum vulgare L.)和油菜(Brassica napus L.) 3种农作物的生物量。从卫星图像中提取了HH和VV两个极化通道的雷达后向散射系数σ 0。随后,计算HH和VV极化组合(如HH/VV、HH + VV、HH × VV),利用多元逐步回归建立SAR数据与各作物类型鲜、干生物量之间的关系。此外,采用半经验水云模型(WCM)来解释作物生物量对雷达后向散射数据的影响。本文还探讨了随机森林(RF)机器学习方法的潜力。采用分割抽样方法(即70%训练和30%测试)对逐步模型、WCM和RF进行验证。利用双极化数据的多元逐步回归方法能够在不需要任何外部输入变量(如(实际)土壤湿度信息)的情况下反演出三种作物的生物量,特别是干生物量,R2 > 0.7。随机森林技术与WCM的比较表明,随机森林技术在生物量估计方面明显优于WCM,特别是对新鲜生物量的估计。例如,不同作物类型的新鲜生物量估算,RF的r2 > 0.68,而WCM的r2仅< 0.35。然而,对于干生物量,两种方法的结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信