The influence of nonlinear shear stress on partially averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS) method

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
Jin-tao Liu (刘锦涛) , Peng-cheng Guo (郭鹏程) , Tie-jun Chen (陈铁军) , Yu-lin Wu (吴玉林)
{"title":"The influence of nonlinear shear stress on partially averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS) method","authors":"Jin-tao Liu (刘锦涛) ,&nbsp;Peng-cheng Guo (郭鹏程) ,&nbsp;Tie-jun Chen (陈铁军) ,&nbsp;Yu-lin Wu (吴玉林)","doi":"10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60759-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In most of partially averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS) methods, the Reynolds stress is solved by a linear hypothesis isotropic model. They could not capture all kinds of vortexes in tubomachineries. In this paper, a PANS model is modified from the RNG <em>k</em> − ɛ turbulence model and is used to investigate the influence of the nonlinear shear stress on the simulation of the high pressure gradient flows and the large curvature flows. Comparisons are made between the result obtained by using the PANS model modified from the RNG <em>k</em> − ɛ model and that obtained by using the nonlinear PANS methods. The flow past a curved rectangular duct is calculated by using the PANS methods. The obtained nonlinear shear stress agrees well with the experimental results, especially in the high pressure gradient region. The calculation results show that the nonlinear PANS methods are more reliable than the linear PANS methods for the high pressure gradient flows, the large curvature flows, and they can be used to capture complex vortexes in a turbomachinary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":66131,"journal":{"name":"水动力学研究与进展:英文版","volume":"29 3","pages":"Pages 479-484"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60759-X","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"水动力学研究与进展:英文版","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S100160581660759X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In most of partially averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS) methods, the Reynolds stress is solved by a linear hypothesis isotropic model. They could not capture all kinds of vortexes in tubomachineries. In this paper, a PANS model is modified from the RNG k − ɛ turbulence model and is used to investigate the influence of the nonlinear shear stress on the simulation of the high pressure gradient flows and the large curvature flows. Comparisons are made between the result obtained by using the PANS model modified from the RNG k − ɛ model and that obtained by using the nonlinear PANS methods. The flow past a curved rectangular duct is calculated by using the PANS methods. The obtained nonlinear shear stress agrees well with the experimental results, especially in the high pressure gradient region. The calculation results show that the nonlinear PANS methods are more reliable than the linear PANS methods for the high pressure gradient flows, the large curvature flows, and they can be used to capture complex vortexes in a turbomachinary.

非线性剪应力对部分平均Navier-Stokes法的影响
在大多数部分平均Navier-Stokes (PANS)方法中,雷诺兹应力是用线性假设各向同性模型求解的。他们无法捕捉到所有类型的涡在涡轮机械中。本文在RNG k−i湍流模型的基础上改进了pan模型,研究了非线性剪切应力对高压梯度流和大曲率流模拟的影响。将RNG k−i模型修正后的PANS模型与非线性PANS方法的结果进行了比较。用PANS方法计算了弯曲矩形管道的流动。所得的非线性剪应力与实验结果吻合较好,特别是在高压梯度区域。计算结果表明,对于高压梯度流动和大曲率流动,非线性PANS方法比线性PANS方法更可靠,并可用于捕获涡轮机械内部的复杂涡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1240
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信