Brain tumor related epilepsy: pathophysiological approaches and rational management of antiseizure medication.

Sabine Seidel, Tim Wehner, Dorothea Miller, Jörg Wellmer, Uwe Schlegel, Wenke Grönheit
{"title":"Brain tumor related epilepsy: pathophysiological approaches and rational management of antiseizure medication.","authors":"Sabine Seidel,&nbsp;Tim Wehner,&nbsp;Dorothea Miller,&nbsp;Jörg Wellmer,&nbsp;Uwe Schlegel,&nbsp;Wenke Grönheit","doi":"10.1186/s42466-022-00205-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain tumor related epilepsy (BTRE) is a common complication of cerebral tumors and its incidence is highly dependent on the type of tumor, ranging from 10-15% in brain metastases to > 80% in low grade gliomas. Clinical management is challenging and has to take into account aspects beyond the treatment of non-tumoral epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>Increasing knowledge about the pathophysiology of BTRE, particularly on glutamatergic mechanisms of oncogenesis and epileptogenesis, might influence management of anti-tumor and BTRE treatment in the future. The first seizure implies the diagnosis of epilepsy in patients with brain tumors. Due to the lack of prospective randomized trials in BTRE, general recommendations for focal epilepsies currently apply concerning the initiation of antiseizure medication (ASM). Non-enzyme inducing ASM is preferable. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate, if AMPA inhibitors like perampanel possess anti-tumor effects. ASM withdrawal has to be weighed very carefully against the risk of seizure recurrence, but can be achievable in selected patients. Permission to drive is possible for some patients with BTRE under well-defined conditions, but requires thorough neurological, radiological, ophthalmological and neuropsychological examination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An evolving knowledge on pathophysiology of BTRE might influence future therapy. Randomized trials on ASM in BTRE with reliable endpoints are needed. Management of withdrawal of ASMs and permission to drive demands thorough diagnostic as well as neurooncological and epileptological expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":19169,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442934/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00205-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Brain tumor related epilepsy (BTRE) is a common complication of cerebral tumors and its incidence is highly dependent on the type of tumor, ranging from 10-15% in brain metastases to > 80% in low grade gliomas. Clinical management is challenging and has to take into account aspects beyond the treatment of non-tumoral epilepsy.

Main body: Increasing knowledge about the pathophysiology of BTRE, particularly on glutamatergic mechanisms of oncogenesis and epileptogenesis, might influence management of anti-tumor and BTRE treatment in the future. The first seizure implies the diagnosis of epilepsy in patients with brain tumors. Due to the lack of prospective randomized trials in BTRE, general recommendations for focal epilepsies currently apply concerning the initiation of antiseizure medication (ASM). Non-enzyme inducing ASM is preferable. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate, if AMPA inhibitors like perampanel possess anti-tumor effects. ASM withdrawal has to be weighed very carefully against the risk of seizure recurrence, but can be achievable in selected patients. Permission to drive is possible for some patients with BTRE under well-defined conditions, but requires thorough neurological, radiological, ophthalmological and neuropsychological examination.

Conclusion: An evolving knowledge on pathophysiology of BTRE might influence future therapy. Randomized trials on ASM in BTRE with reliable endpoints are needed. Management of withdrawal of ASMs and permission to drive demands thorough diagnostic as well as neurooncological and epileptological expertise.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脑肿瘤相关性癫痫:病理生理途径和抗癫痫药物的合理管理。
背景:脑肿瘤相关性癫痫(BTRE)是脑肿瘤的常见并发症,其发病率与肿瘤类型高度相关,脑转移的发生率为10-15%,低级别胶质瘤的发生率> 80%。临床管理是具有挑战性的,必须考虑到非肿瘤性癫痫治疗之外的方面。正文:对BTRE的病理生理学,特别是对肿瘤发生和癫痫发生的谷氨酸能机制的了解的增加,可能会影响未来抗肿瘤和BTRE治疗的管理。第一次癫痫发作意味着脑肿瘤患者的癫痫诊断。由于BTRE缺乏前瞻性随机试验,目前针对局灶性癫痫的一般建议适用于抗癫痫药物(ASM)的起始治疗。非酶诱导ASM优先。如果AMPA抑制剂如perampanel具有抗肿瘤作用,则需要前瞻性试验来评估。ASM的退出必须非常仔细地权衡癫痫复发的风险,但可以在选定的患者实现。一些BTRE患者在明确的条件下可以被允许驾驶,但需要进行彻底的神经学、放射学、眼科和神经心理学检查。结论:BTRE病理生理学知识的不断发展可能影响未来的治疗。需要有可靠终点的BTRE患者ASM的随机试验。asm的退出和驾驶许可的管理需要彻底的诊断以及神经肿瘤学和癫痫学的专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信