A New Priority Pathway for Biologicals in Australia: Contextualising and Evaluating the Proposed Reforms.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2022-08-01
Christopher Rudge, Sara Attinger, Ian Kerridge, Wendy Lipworth, Cameron Stewart
{"title":"A New Priority Pathway for Biologicals in Australia: Contextualising and Evaluating the Proposed Reforms.","authors":"Christopher Rudge,&nbsp;Sara Attinger,&nbsp;Ian Kerridge,&nbsp;Wendy Lipworth,&nbsp;Cameron Stewart","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This section examines recent reforms to the regulatory framework for biologicals contained in the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (Cth) in the context of the \"New Frontier\" of reform envisioned in a report completed by the Commonwealth Government in 2021. It compares Australia's proposed reform of the approval processes for biologicals to similar reforms that have been made over the last three decades in the United States and the European Union. It places the Australian reforms in the context of the commercialisation of regenerative medicine and identifies several potential shortcomings of the proposed reforms and reports on the current lack of data on the processes of expedited approvals in Australia more generally.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"29 3","pages":"677-699"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This section examines recent reforms to the regulatory framework for biologicals contained in the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (Cth) in the context of the "New Frontier" of reform envisioned in a report completed by the Commonwealth Government in 2021. It compares Australia's proposed reform of the approval processes for biologicals to similar reforms that have been made over the last three decades in the United States and the European Union. It places the Australian reforms in the context of the commercialisation of regenerative medicine and identifies several potential shortcomings of the proposed reforms and reports on the current lack of data on the processes of expedited approvals in Australia more generally.

澳大利亚生物制品的新优先途径:背景化和评估拟议的改革。
本节将在联邦政府2021年完成的一份报告中设想的改革“新前沿”的背景下,研究1989年《治疗用品法》(Cth)中所包含的生物制品监管框架的最新改革。报告将澳大利亚提出的生物制品审批程序改革与美国和欧盟在过去三十年中进行的类似改革进行了比较。它将澳大利亚的改革置于再生医学商业化的背景下,确定了拟议改革的几个潜在缺点,并报告了目前缺乏关于澳大利亚更普遍的加速批准过程的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信