Who is prescribed valproate and how carefully is this treatment reviewed in UK mental health services? Data from a clinical audit.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2022-08-23 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20451253221110016
Carol Paton, Leslie Citrome, Emilio Fernandez-Egea, Olivia Rendora, Thomas R E Barnes
{"title":"Who is prescribed valproate and how carefully is this treatment reviewed in UK mental health services? Data from a clinical audit.","authors":"Carol Paton,&nbsp;Leslie Citrome,&nbsp;Emilio Fernandez-Egea,&nbsp;Olivia Rendora,&nbsp;Thomas R E Barnes","doi":"10.1177/20451253221110016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The licensed indications for valproate are narrow, yet this medication is commonly prescribed in mental health services.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the target symptoms/behaviours for which valproate is prescribed and how well the efficacy and tolerability of this treatment are monitored in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An audit-based quality improvement (QI) programme in UK mental health services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Information on valproate prescribing was collected from clinical records using a bespoke data collection tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four NHS mental health Trusts/healthcare organisations submitted data on valproate treatment for 5320 patients. Valproate was clearly prescribed for a licensed indication in 1995 (38%) patients, off-label in 1987 (37%) while the indication was uncertain/not available in 1338 (25%). Of the 919 patients started on valproate treatment within the past year, between a half and two-thirds had each of the relevant baseline physical health checks documented. In 539 (59%) of these patients, valproate was prescribed for an unlicensed indication; the prescription was recognised as off-label in 363 (67%), 20 (6%) of whom were documented as having had this explained to them. Of 631 patients prescribed valproate for between 3 months and a year, early on-treatment assessments of response and side effects were documented in 441 (70%) and 332 (53%), respectively. Of 4401 patients treated for more than a year, annual on-treatment reviews of clinical response and side effects were documented in 2771 (63%) and 2140 (49%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest the majority of prescriptions for valproate in mental health services are not for a licensed indication. Furthermore, patients rarely receive an explanation that their valproate prescription is off-label, perhaps partly because the licensed indications are not widely understood by prescribers. Given the very limited evidence for efficacy for the off-label uses of valproate, failure to routinely conduct early on-treatment and annual reviews of the benefits and side effects of this medication may result in patients remaining on ineffective and poorly tolerated treatment by default.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9d/b5/10.1177_20451253221110016.PMC9425878.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253221110016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The licensed indications for valproate are narrow, yet this medication is commonly prescribed in mental health services.

Objectives: To explore the target symptoms/behaviours for which valproate is prescribed and how well the efficacy and tolerability of this treatment are monitored in routine clinical practice.

Design: An audit-based quality improvement (QI) programme in UK mental health services.

Methods: Information on valproate prescribing was collected from clinical records using a bespoke data collection tool.

Results: Sixty-four NHS mental health Trusts/healthcare organisations submitted data on valproate treatment for 5320 patients. Valproate was clearly prescribed for a licensed indication in 1995 (38%) patients, off-label in 1987 (37%) while the indication was uncertain/not available in 1338 (25%). Of the 919 patients started on valproate treatment within the past year, between a half and two-thirds had each of the relevant baseline physical health checks documented. In 539 (59%) of these patients, valproate was prescribed for an unlicensed indication; the prescription was recognised as off-label in 363 (67%), 20 (6%) of whom were documented as having had this explained to them. Of 631 patients prescribed valproate for between 3 months and a year, early on-treatment assessments of response and side effects were documented in 441 (70%) and 332 (53%), respectively. Of 4401 patients treated for more than a year, annual on-treatment reviews of clinical response and side effects were documented in 2771 (63%) and 2140 (49%), respectively.

Conclusion: Our data suggest the majority of prescriptions for valproate in mental health services are not for a licensed indication. Furthermore, patients rarely receive an explanation that their valproate prescription is off-label, perhaps partly because the licensed indications are not widely understood by prescribers. Given the very limited evidence for efficacy for the off-label uses of valproate, failure to routinely conduct early on-treatment and annual reviews of the benefits and side effects of this medication may result in patients remaining on ineffective and poorly tolerated treatment by default.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

谁开丙戊酸?英国精神卫生服务对这种治疗的审查有多仔细?临床审计数据。
背景:丙戊酸的许可适应症很窄,但这种药物通常在精神卫生服务中开处方。目的:探讨丙戊酸处方的目标症状/行为,以及在常规临床实践中对这种治疗的疗效和耐受性的监测情况。设计:基于审计的英国精神卫生服务质量改进(QI)方案。方法:使用定制的数据收集工具从临床记录中收集丙戊酸处方信息。结果:64个NHS心理健康信托/医疗机构提交了5320名患者丙戊酸治疗的数据。1995年(38%)患者明确使用丙戊酸钠作为许可适应症,1987年(37%)患者使用说明书外适应症,1338例(25%)患者的适应症不确定/不可用。在过去一年内开始接受丙戊酸治疗的919名患者中,有一半到三分之二的人记录了每项相关的基线身体健康检查。在539例(59%)患者中,丙戊酸盐被用于未经许可的适应症;363人(67%)的处方被认定为标签外处方,其中20人(6%)被记录为已经向他们解释过这一点。在631例服用丙戊酸3个月至1年的患者中,分别有441例(70%)和332例(53%)记录了早期治疗反应和副作用评估。在4401例治疗超过一年的患者中,分别有2771例(63%)和2140例(49%)记录了临床反应和副作用的年度治疗期间回顾。结论:我们的数据表明,在精神卫生服务中,大多数丙戊酸的处方不是用于许可适应症的。此外,患者很少得到解释说他们的丙戊酸盐处方是标签外的,部分原因可能是处方者对许可的适应症没有广泛理解。鉴于丙戊酸说明书外使用的有效性证据非常有限,未能常规进行早期治疗和每年对该药物的益处和副作用进行审查,可能导致患者默认继续接受无效和耐受性差的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of psychopharmacology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in psychopharmacology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信