Pulmonary Functions in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: A Case-Control Study

IF 1.2 4区医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.07.002

Figen Dağ PhD, PT , Serkan Taş PhD, PT , Özlem Bölgen Çimen MD

{"title":"Pulmonary Functions in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: A Case-Control Study","authors":"Figen Dağ PhD, PT , Serkan Taş PhD, PT , Özlem Bölgen Çimen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of the study was to investigate pulmonary functions of patients with chronic neck pain and compare them with those of asymptomatic controls.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>This case-control study was conducted with 25 patients with chronic neck pain (age, 26.84 ± 7.89 years) and 27 age-matched asymptomatic controls (age, 25.96 ± 7.13 years). Pulmonary function tests<span> were performed using spirometry (Quark PFT, COSMED, Rome, Italy). </span></span>Forced vital capacity<span> (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV</span></span><sub>1</sub><span><span>), forced expiratory flow<span> at 25% to 75% vital capacity, peak expiratory flow, </span></span>maximum voluntary ventilation, and the FEV</span><sub>1</sub>/FVC ratio were measured and are expressed as (%) predicted value for patients with chronic neck pain and asymptomatic controls.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The chronic neck pain group had lower FEV<sub>1</sub> (<em>P</em> = .015), FVC (<em>P</em> = .029), forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% vital capacity (<em>P</em> = .040), and maximum voluntary ventilation (<em>P</em> = .042) compared with asymptomatic controls; however, FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC (<em>P</em> = .470) and peak expiratory flow (<em>P</em> = .183) were similar in both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These results demonstrated that dynamic lung volumes were lower in patients with chronic neck pain compared with asymptomatic controls.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475422000914","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of the study was to investigate pulmonary functions of patients with chronic neck pain and compare them with those of asymptomatic controls.

Methods

This case-control study was conducted with 25 patients with chronic neck pain (age, 26.84 ± 7.89 years) and 27 age-matched asymptomatic controls (age, 25.96 ± 7.13 years). Pulmonary function tests were performed using spirometry (Quark PFT, COSMED, Rome, Italy). Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV₁), forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% vital capacity, peak expiratory flow, maximum voluntary ventilation, and the FEV₁/FVC ratio were measured and are expressed as (%) predicted value for patients with chronic neck pain and asymptomatic controls.

Results

The chronic neck pain group had lower FEV₁ (P = .015), FVC (P = .029), forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% vital capacity (P = .040), and maximum voluntary ventilation (P = .042) compared with asymptomatic controls; however, FEV₁/FVC (P = .470) and peak expiratory flow (P = .183) were similar in both groups.

Conclusion

These results demonstrated that dynamic lung volumes were lower in patients with chronic neck pain compared with asymptomatic controls.

查看原文本刊更多论文

慢性颈部疼痛患者的肺功能:一项病例对照研究

目的探讨慢性颈痛患者的肺功能，并与无症状对照组进行比较。方法选取25例慢性颈痛患者(年龄26.84±7.89岁)和27例年龄匹配的无症状对照组(年龄25.96±7.13岁)进行病例对照研究。肺功能测试采用肺活量测定法(夸克PFT, COSMED，罗马，意大利)。测量慢性颈痛患者和无症状对照者的用力肺活量(FVC)、第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、用力肺活量在25% ~ 75%时的用力呼气流量、呼气峰值流量、最大自主通气和FEV1/FVC比值，并以(%)预测值表示。结果慢性颈痛组患者FEV1 (P = 0.015)、FVC (P = 0.029)、肺活量25% ~ 75%时用力呼气流量(P = 0.040)、最大自主通气(P = 0.042)均低于无症状对照组;然而，两组FEV1/FVC (P = 0.470)和呼气峰流量(P = 0.183)相似。结论慢性颈痛患者动态肺容量低于无症状对照组。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 医学-康复医学

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

7.70%

发文量

审稿时长

29 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.