A randomized controlled trial in schools aimed at exploring mechanisms of change of a multifaceted implementation strategy for promoting mental health at the workplace.

Lydia Kwak, Anna Toropova, Byron J Powell, Rebecca Lengnick-Hall, Irene Jensen, Gunnar Bergström, Liselotte Schäfer Elinder, Kjerstin Stigmar, Charlotte Wåhlin, Christina Björklund
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial in schools aimed at exploring mechanisms of change of a multifaceted implementation strategy for promoting mental health at the workplace.","authors":"Lydia Kwak,&nbsp;Anna Toropova,&nbsp;Byron J Powell,&nbsp;Rebecca Lengnick-Hall,&nbsp;Irene Jensen,&nbsp;Gunnar Bergström,&nbsp;Liselotte Schäfer Elinder,&nbsp;Kjerstin Stigmar,&nbsp;Charlotte Wåhlin,&nbsp;Christina Björklund","doi":"10.1186/s13012-022-01230-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study will explore implementation mechanisms through which a single implementation strategy and a multifaceted implementation strategy operate to affect the implementation outcome, which is fidelity to the Guideline For The Prevention of Mental Ill Health within schools. The guideline gives recommendations on how workplaces can prevent mental ill health among their personnel by managing social and organizational risks factors in the work environment. Schools are chosen as the setting for the study due to the high prevalence of mental ill health among teachers and other personnel working in schools. The study builds on our previous research, in which we compared the effectiveness of the two strategies on fidelity to the guideline. Small improvements in guideline adherence were observed for the majority of the indicators in the multifaceted strategy group. This study will focus on exploring the underlying mechanisms of change through which the implementation strategies may operate to affect the implementation outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will conduct a cluster-randomized-controlled trial among public schools (n=55 schools) in Sweden. Schools are randomized (1:1 ratio) to receive a multifaceted strategy (implementation teams, educational meeting, ongoing training, Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles) or a single strategy (implementation teams, educational meeting). The implementation outcome is fidelity to the guideline. Hypothesized mediators originate from the COM-B model. A mixed-method design will be employed, entailing a qualitative study of implementation process embedded within the cluster-randomized controlled trail examining implementation mechanisms. The methods will be used in a complementary manner to get a full understanding of the implementation mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This implementation study will provide valuable knowledge on how implementation strategies work (or fail) to affect implementation outcomes. The knowledge gained will aid the selection of effective implementation strategies that fit specific determinants, which is a priority for the field. Despite recent initiatives to advance the understanding of implementation mechanisms, studies testing these mechanisms are still uncommon.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.org dr.nr 2020-01214.</p>","PeriodicalId":417097,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science : IS","volume":" ","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438275/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science : IS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01230-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: This study will explore implementation mechanisms through which a single implementation strategy and a multifaceted implementation strategy operate to affect the implementation outcome, which is fidelity to the Guideline For The Prevention of Mental Ill Health within schools. The guideline gives recommendations on how workplaces can prevent mental ill health among their personnel by managing social and organizational risks factors in the work environment. Schools are chosen as the setting for the study due to the high prevalence of mental ill health among teachers and other personnel working in schools. The study builds on our previous research, in which we compared the effectiveness of the two strategies on fidelity to the guideline. Small improvements in guideline adherence were observed for the majority of the indicators in the multifaceted strategy group. This study will focus on exploring the underlying mechanisms of change through which the implementation strategies may operate to affect the implementation outcome.

Methods: We will conduct a cluster-randomized-controlled trial among public schools (n=55 schools) in Sweden. Schools are randomized (1:1 ratio) to receive a multifaceted strategy (implementation teams, educational meeting, ongoing training, Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles) or a single strategy (implementation teams, educational meeting). The implementation outcome is fidelity to the guideline. Hypothesized mediators originate from the COM-B model. A mixed-method design will be employed, entailing a qualitative study of implementation process embedded within the cluster-randomized controlled trail examining implementation mechanisms. The methods will be used in a complementary manner to get a full understanding of the implementation mechanisms.

Discussion: This implementation study will provide valuable knowledge on how implementation strategies work (or fail) to affect implementation outcomes. The knowledge gained will aid the selection of effective implementation strategies that fit specific determinants, which is a priority for the field. Despite recent initiatives to advance the understanding of implementation mechanisms, studies testing these mechanisms are still uncommon.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.org dr.nr 2020-01214.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项在学校进行的随机对照试验,旨在探索促进工作场所心理健康的多方面实施策略的变化机制。
背景:本研究将探讨单一实施策略和多元实施策略对学校心理疾病预防指南实施效果的影响机制。该指南就工作场所如何通过管理工作环境中的社会和组织风险因素来预防其工作人员的精神疾病提出了建议。之所以选择学校作为研究地点,是因为在学校工作的教师和其他人员中精神疾病的发病率很高。本研究建立在我们之前的研究基础上,我们比较了两种策略对指南保真度的有效性。在多面策略组的大多数指标中,观察到指南依从性的微小改善。本研究将著重于探索变革的潜在机制,透过这些机制,实施策略可能会影响实施结果。方法:我们将在瑞典的公立学校(n=55所学校)中进行一项聚类随机对照试验。学校被随机分配(1:1比例),接受多方面的策略(实施团队、教育会议、持续培训、计划-实施-研究-行动循环)或单一策略(实施团队、教育会议)。实现结果是对指导方针的忠实。假设的介质来自COM-B模型。将采用混合方法设计,需要对实施过程进行定性研究,嵌入在检查实施机制的随机对照试验中。将以互补的方式使用这些方法,以充分了解执行机制。讨论:本实施研究将提供有关实施策略如何影响实施结果的宝贵知识。所获得的知识将有助于选择适合具体决定因素的有效实施战略,这是该领域的优先事项。尽管最近采取了一些举措来促进对实施机制的理解,但测试这些机制的研究仍然不多见。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.org dr.nr 2020-01214。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信