Comparative assessment of the efficacy of low concentration bleaching agents using quantitative light induced fluorescence in removing stains: An In vitro study.

Q3 Dentistry
Aiswarya Balakrishnan, Nandlal Bhojraj, Raghavendra Shanbhog, K P Ashwini
{"title":"Comparative assessment of the efficacy of low concentration bleaching agents using quantitative light induced fluorescence in removing stains: An <i>In vitro</i> study.","authors":"Aiswarya Balakrishnan,&nbsp;Nandlal Bhojraj,&nbsp;Raghavendra Shanbhog,&nbsp;K P Ashwini","doi":"10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_303_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tooth discoloration has become a common esthetic problem in recent years. Removal of stains by bleaching is well-documented. Low concentration home bleaching products are available in market in different forms and concentrations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of low concentration commercially available home bleaching products (whitening strip, gel, and mouthwash) in removing stains and whitening the tooth using clinical and digital methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty permanent enamel samples mounted in an acrylic block were artificially stained and randomly divided into four groups. Negative control, 15 % Carbamide peroxide gel group, 2% Hydrogen 16 peroxide mouthwash group and 6% Hydrogen peroxide strip group respectively. The samples were bleached with respective agents according to the manufacturer's instructions. The efficacy on 7<sup>th</sup> and 14<sup>th</sup> day was evaluated clinically (SGU change), photographically (ΔE), and using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (ΔF). The data were analyzed using paired t-test and analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postbleaching, 6% hydrogen peroxide strips and 15% carbamide peroxide gel showed maximum improvement (ΔΔF - 15.73 and 11.89, ΔE - 19.8 and 18.9, respectively) when compared to 2% hydrogen peroxide mouthwash and negative control group (ΔΔF - 9.68 and 6.59, ΔE - 15.04 and 9.44, respectively). The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>6% hydrogen peroxide strips and 15% carbamide peroxide gel showed maximum improvement in stain removal and tooth whitening however, the strips showed better efficacy than the gel. Strips have the added advantage of lesser contact period, less salivary dilution, and no gingival contact. Therefore, strips can be a better alternative for gels and mouthwashes.</p>","PeriodicalId":35797,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"338-346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_303_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tooth discoloration has become a common esthetic problem in recent years. Removal of stains by bleaching is well-documented. Low concentration home bleaching products are available in market in different forms and concentrations.

Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of low concentration commercially available home bleaching products (whitening strip, gel, and mouthwash) in removing stains and whitening the tooth using clinical and digital methods.

Materials and methods: Sixty permanent enamel samples mounted in an acrylic block were artificially stained and randomly divided into four groups. Negative control, 15 % Carbamide peroxide gel group, 2% Hydrogen 16 peroxide mouthwash group and 6% Hydrogen peroxide strip group respectively. The samples were bleached with respective agents according to the manufacturer's instructions. The efficacy on 7th and 14th day was evaluated clinically (SGU change), photographically (ΔE), and using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (ΔF). The data were analyzed using paired t-test and analysis of variance.

Results: Postbleaching, 6% hydrogen peroxide strips and 15% carbamide peroxide gel showed maximum improvement (ΔΔF - 15.73 and 11.89, ΔE - 19.8 and 18.9, respectively) when compared to 2% hydrogen peroxide mouthwash and negative control group (ΔΔF - 9.68 and 6.59, ΔE - 15.04 and 9.44, respectively). The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001).

Conclusion: 6% hydrogen peroxide strips and 15% carbamide peroxide gel showed maximum improvement in stain removal and tooth whitening however, the strips showed better efficacy than the gel. Strips have the added advantage of lesser contact period, less salivary dilution, and no gingival contact. Therefore, strips can be a better alternative for gels and mouthwashes.

定量光诱导荧光法对低浓度漂白剂去除污渍效果的比较研究。
背景:近年来,牙齿变色已成为常见的审美问题。用漂白剂去除污渍是有据可查的。低浓度家用漂白产品在市场上有不同的形式和浓度。目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较低浓度的市售家用漂白产品(美白条、凝胶和漱口水)在临床和数字方法去除牙齿污渍和美白牙齿方面的功效。材料和方法:将60个永久性珐琅样品固定在丙烯酸块上进行人工染色,随机分为4组。阴性对照组、15%过氧化脲凝胶组、2%过氧化氢16漱口水组、6%过氧化氢条组。根据制造商的说明,用各自的试剂对样品进行漂白。第7天和第14天分别进行临床(SGU变化)、摄影(ΔE)和定量光诱导荧光(ΔF)评价疗效。数据分析采用配对t检验和方差分析。结果:与2%过氧化氢漱口水和阴性对照组(ΔΔF - 9.68和6.59,ΔE - 15.04和9.44)相比,漂白后6%过氧化氢贴片和15%过氧化脲凝胶改善效果最大(分别为ΔΔF - 15.73和11.89,ΔE - 19.8和18.9)。差异有统计学意义(P = 0.001)。结论:6%过氧化氢条和15%过氧化脲凝胶对牙齿去斑和美白的改善效果最大,但过氧化氢条的效果优于凝胶。贴片的附加优点是接触时间短,唾液稀释少,不接触牙龈。因此,洁面条是比凝胶和漱口水更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry (ISSN - 0970-4388) is the official organ of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. The journal publishes original articles and case reports pertaining to pediatric and preventive dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信