IMPACT OF TIME TO EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT RESUSCITATIVE AORTIC OCCLUSION AFTER NONCOMPRESSIBLE TORSO HEMORRHAGE.

Shock (Augusta, Ga.) Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-06 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000001988
Jacob M Broome, Ayman Ali, John T Simpson, Sherman Tran, Danielle Tatum, Sharven Taghavi, Joseph DuBose, Juan Duchesne
{"title":"IMPACT OF TIME TO EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT RESUSCITATIVE AORTIC OCCLUSION AFTER NONCOMPRESSIBLE TORSO HEMORRHAGE.","authors":"Jacob M Broome,&nbsp;Ayman Ali,&nbsp;John T Simpson,&nbsp;Sherman Tran,&nbsp;Danielle Tatum,&nbsp;Sharven Taghavi,&nbsp;Joseph DuBose,&nbsp;Juan Duchesne","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000001988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Introduction: Time is an essential element in outcomes of trauma patients. The relationship of time to treatment in management of noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) or resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) has not been previously described. We hypothesized that shorter times to intervention would reduce mortality. Methods: A review of the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery registry from 2013 to 2022 was performed to identify patients who underwent emergency department aortic occlusion (AO). Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the impact of time to treatment on mortality. Results: A total of 1,853 patients (1,245 [67%] RT, 608 [33%] REBOA) were included. Most patients were male (82%) with a median age of 34 years (interquartile range, 30). Median time from injury to admission and admission to successful AO were 31 versus 11 minutes, respectively. Patients who died had shorter median times from injury to successful AO (44 vs. 72 minutes, P &lt; 0.001) and admission to successful AO (10 vs. 22 minutes, P &lt; 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that receiving RT was the strongest predictor of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 6.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4-9.9; P &lt; 0.001). Time from injury to admission and admission to successful AO were not significant. This finding was consistent in subgroup analysis of RT-only and REBOA-only populations. Conclusions: Despite expedited interventions, time to aortic occlusion did not significantly impact mortality. This may suggest that rapid in-hospital intervention was often insufficient to compensate for severe exsanguination and hypovolemia that had already occurred before emergency department presentation. Selective prehospital advanced resuscitative care closer to the point of injury with \"scoop and control\" efforts including hemostatic resuscitation warrants special consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":238832,"journal":{"name":"Shock (Augusta, Ga.)","volume":" ","pages":"275-279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock (Augusta, Ga.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Time is an essential element in outcomes of trauma patients. The relationship of time to treatment in management of noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) or resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) has not been previously described. We hypothesized that shorter times to intervention would reduce mortality. Methods: A review of the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery registry from 2013 to 2022 was performed to identify patients who underwent emergency department aortic occlusion (AO). Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the impact of time to treatment on mortality. Results: A total of 1,853 patients (1,245 [67%] RT, 608 [33%] REBOA) were included. Most patients were male (82%) with a median age of 34 years (interquartile range, 30). Median time from injury to admission and admission to successful AO were 31 versus 11 minutes, respectively. Patients who died had shorter median times from injury to successful AO (44 vs. 72 minutes, P < 0.001) and admission to successful AO (10 vs. 22 minutes, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that receiving RT was the strongest predictor of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 6.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4-9.9; P < 0.001). Time from injury to admission and admission to successful AO were not significant. This finding was consistent in subgroup analysis of RT-only and REBOA-only populations. Conclusions: Despite expedited interventions, time to aortic occlusion did not significantly impact mortality. This may suggest that rapid in-hospital intervention was often insufficient to compensate for severe exsanguination and hypovolemia that had already occurred before emergency department presentation. Selective prehospital advanced resuscitative care closer to the point of injury with "scoop and control" efforts including hemostatic resuscitation warrants special consideration.

不可压缩性躯干出血后抢救时间对急诊科主动脉阻塞复苏的影响。
摘要:时间是影响创伤患者预后的重要因素。不可压缩性躯干出血(NCTH)合并复苏血管内球囊阻塞主动脉(REBOA)或复苏开胸术(RT)治疗的时间与治疗的关系此前尚未报道。我们假设较短的干预时间会降低死亡率。方法:回顾2013年至2022年创伤和急性护理外科主动脉闭塞复苏登记,以确定急诊科主动脉闭塞(AO)患者。采用多变量logistic回归来检验治疗时间对死亡率的影响。结果:共纳入1853例患者(1245例[67%]RT, 608例[33%]REBOA)。大多数患者为男性(82%),中位年龄为34岁(四分位数间距为30岁)。从受伤到入院和入院到AO成功的中位时间分别为31分钟和11分钟。死亡患者从受伤到成功AO的中位时间较短(44 vs 72分钟,P <0.001)和入院成功的AO (10 vs 22分钟,P <0.001)。多因素logistic回归显示,接受RT治疗是死亡率的最强预测因子(优势比[OR], 6.6;95%置信区间[CI], 4.4-9.9;P & lt;0.001)。受伤至入院、入院至AO成功的时间差异无统计学意义。这一发现在仅rt和仅reboa人群的亚组分析中是一致的。结论:尽管加快了干预措施,主动脉阻塞的时间对死亡率没有显著影响。这可能表明快速的院内干预往往不足以弥补在急诊就诊前已经发生的严重失血和低血容量。有选择性的院前高级复苏护理靠近损伤点,“勺和控制”的努力,包括止血复苏值得特别考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书