Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the Republic of Kazakhstan: A 6-Year Trend Analysis from Efficacy to Availability.

Q2 Medicine
Vyacheslav Lokshin, Meruyert Omar, Sholpan Karibaeva
{"title":"Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the Republic of Kazakhstan: A 6-Year Trend Analysis from Efficacy to Availability.","authors":"Vyacheslav Lokshin,&nbsp;Meruyert Omar,&nbsp;Sholpan Karibaeva","doi":"10.18502/jri.v23i1.8454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The first child after <i>in vitro</i> fertilization (IVF) in the country was born in 1996. However, registering and recording data on assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) in Kazakhstan is not mandatory. The purpose of the current study was to assess the treatment outcomes, availability, regulations, and ART cycles trends between 2011 and 2016.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cycle-based data were collected from voluntarily participating ART centers and then descriptive analysis was performed. The study included 10470 ART cycles using different ART methods during 2011-2016. The availability rate of ART in the country was calculated by dividing the number of treatment cycles per million of the population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The availability of ART per million inhabitants increased by 53.6%, from 236.9/million in 2011, to 364.0/million in 2016. In IVF cycles, clinical pregnancy rates (PRs) per aspiration remained stable, on average 37.1%. After ICSI, the average PR was 42.5%. In frozen embryo replacement cycles, there was an increase in the PR per transfer from 37.0% in 2011, to 42.5% in 2016, on average 39.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Assisted reproductive technologies are developing rapidly in Kazakhstan; therefore, ART monitoring should be improved and become mandatory. Although the data is not yet representative, the most compelling evidence points to low access to ART. Since the use of ART in Central Asian countries is infrequent in comparison to European countries, there is a need to combine IVF data across different nations. This will allow for a deeper assessment of the scientific evidence and reduction of infertility burden through joint efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":38826,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility","volume":"23 1","pages":"61-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d6/91/JRI-23-61.PMC9361721.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproduction and Infertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v23i1.8454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The first child after in vitro fertilization (IVF) in the country was born in 1996. However, registering and recording data on assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) in Kazakhstan is not mandatory. The purpose of the current study was to assess the treatment outcomes, availability, regulations, and ART cycles trends between 2011 and 2016.

Methods: Cycle-based data were collected from voluntarily participating ART centers and then descriptive analysis was performed. The study included 10470 ART cycles using different ART methods during 2011-2016. The availability rate of ART in the country was calculated by dividing the number of treatment cycles per million of the population.

Results: The availability of ART per million inhabitants increased by 53.6%, from 236.9/million in 2011, to 364.0/million in 2016. In IVF cycles, clinical pregnancy rates (PRs) per aspiration remained stable, on average 37.1%. After ICSI, the average PR was 42.5%. In frozen embryo replacement cycles, there was an increase in the PR per transfer from 37.0% in 2011, to 42.5% in 2016, on average 39.2%.

Conclusion: Assisted reproductive technologies are developing rapidly in Kazakhstan; therefore, ART monitoring should be improved and become mandatory. Although the data is not yet representative, the most compelling evidence points to low access to ART. Since the use of ART in Central Asian countries is infrequent in comparison to European countries, there is a need to combine IVF data across different nations. This will allow for a deeper assessment of the scientific evidence and reduction of infertility burden through joint efforts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

哈萨克斯坦共和国辅助生殖技术:从有效性到可获得性的6年趋势分析。
背景:1996年,我国首例体外受精婴儿诞生。然而,在哈萨克斯坦,登记和记录辅助生殖技术的数据并不是强制性的。本研究的目的是评估2011年至2016年间的治疗结果、可用性、法规和ART周期趋势。方法:从自愿参与的ART中心收集基于周期的数据,然后进行描述性分析。该研究包括2011-2016年期间使用不同ART方法的10470个ART周期。该国抗逆转录病毒治疗的可得率是通过除以每百万人的治疗周期数来计算的。结果:每百万居民获得抗逆转录病毒治疗的人数从2011年的2.369万人/百万增加到2016年的3.64万人/百万,增长了53.6%。在IVF周期中,每次抽吸的临床妊娠率(pr)保持稳定,平均为37.1%。ICSI后,平均PR为42.5%。在冷冻胚胎替代周期中,每次移植的PR从2011年的37.0%增加到2016年的42.5%,平均为39.2%。结论:辅助生殖技术在哈萨克斯坦发展迅速;因此,抗逆转录病毒治疗监测应得到改善并成为强制性措施。尽管数据尚不具有代表性,但最令人信服的证据表明抗逆转录病毒治疗的可及性较低。由于与欧洲国家相比,中亚国家使用抗逆转录病毒治疗的频率较低,因此有必要将不同国家的体外受精数据结合起来。这将有助于更深入地评估科学证据,并通过共同努力减少不孕症负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility
Journal of Reproduction and Infertility Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信