The shift in sensory eye dominance from short-term monocular deprivation exhibits no dependence on test spatial frequency.

Yiya Chen, Yu Mao, Jiawei Zhou, Zhifen He, Robert F Hess
{"title":"The shift in sensory eye dominance from short-term monocular deprivation exhibits no dependence on test spatial frequency.","authors":"Yiya Chen,&nbsp;Yu Mao,&nbsp;Jiawei Zhou,&nbsp;Zhifen He,&nbsp;Robert F Hess","doi":"10.1186/s40662-022-00303-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have shown that short-term monocular deprivation induces a shift in sensory eye dominance in favor of the deprived eye. Yet, how short-term monocular deprivation modulates sensory eye dominance across spatial frequency is not clear. To address this issue, we conducted a study to investigate the dependence of short-term monocular deprivation effect on test spatial frequency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten healthy young adults (age: 24.7 ± 1.7 years, four males) with normal vision participated. We deprived their dominant eye with a translucent patch for 2.5 h. The interocular contrast ratio (dominant eye/non-dominant eye, i.e., the balance point [BP]), which indicates the contribution that the two eyes make to binocular combination, was measured using a binocular orientation combination task. We assessed if BPs at 0.5, 4 or 6 cycles/degree (c/d) change as a result of monocular deprivation. Different test spatial frequency conditions were conducted on three separate days in a random fashion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We compared the BPs at 0.5, 4 and 6 c/d before and after monocular deprivation. The BPs were found to be significantly affected by deprivation, where sensory eye dominance shift to the deprived eye (F<sub>1.86, 16.76</sub> = 33.09, P < 0.001). The changes of BP were consistent at 0.5, 4, and 6 c/d spatial frequencies (F<sub>2,18</sub> = 0.15, P = 0.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sensory eye dominance plasticity induced by short-term deprivation is not dependent on test spatial frequency, suggesting it could provide a practical solution for amblyopic therapy that was concerned with the binocular outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":520624,"journal":{"name":"Eye and vision (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9434876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye and vision (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00303-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown that short-term monocular deprivation induces a shift in sensory eye dominance in favor of the deprived eye. Yet, how short-term monocular deprivation modulates sensory eye dominance across spatial frequency is not clear. To address this issue, we conducted a study to investigate the dependence of short-term monocular deprivation effect on test spatial frequency.

Methods: Ten healthy young adults (age: 24.7 ± 1.7 years, four males) with normal vision participated. We deprived their dominant eye with a translucent patch for 2.5 h. The interocular contrast ratio (dominant eye/non-dominant eye, i.e., the balance point [BP]), which indicates the contribution that the two eyes make to binocular combination, was measured using a binocular orientation combination task. We assessed if BPs at 0.5, 4 or 6 cycles/degree (c/d) change as a result of monocular deprivation. Different test spatial frequency conditions were conducted on three separate days in a random fashion.

Results: We compared the BPs at 0.5, 4 and 6 c/d before and after monocular deprivation. The BPs were found to be significantly affected by deprivation, where sensory eye dominance shift to the deprived eye (F1.86, 16.76 = 33.09, P < 0.001). The changes of BP were consistent at 0.5, 4, and 6 c/d spatial frequencies (F2,18 = 0.15, P = 0.57).

Conclusion: The sensory eye dominance plasticity induced by short-term deprivation is not dependent on test spatial frequency, suggesting it could provide a practical solution for amblyopic therapy that was concerned with the binocular outcome.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

感觉眼优势从短期单眼剥夺的转变不依赖于测试空间频率。
背景:研究表明,短期单眼剥夺会导致感觉眼优势向被剥夺眼转移。然而,短期单眼剥夺如何调节感官眼优势的空间频率尚不清楚。为了解决这一问题,我们进行了短期单眼剥夺效应对测试空间频率的依赖研究。方法:10例视力正常的健康青年(年龄24.7±1.7岁,男性4例)。我们用一个半透明的眼罩剥夺他们的主眼2.5小时。用双眼定向组合任务测量双眼对比率(主眼/非主眼,即平衡点[BP]),这表明两只眼睛对双眼组合的贡献。我们评估了0.5、4或6周期/度(c/d)时的bp是否因单眼剥夺而改变。不同的测试空间频率条件在三个独立的日子里以随机的方式进行。结果:我们比较了单眼剥夺前后0.5、4、6 c/d的bp。当感觉眼的优势向被剥夺眼转移时,bp受到显著影响(F1.86, 16.76 = 33.09, P 2,18 = 0.15, P = 0.57)。结论:短期剥夺引起的感觉眼优势可塑性不依赖于测试空间频率,为关注双眼结果的弱视治疗提供了切实可行的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信