MicroCT evaluation for CAD/CAM occlusal veneer fit using two materials and three cement space settings.

Q2 Medicine
Adel Abdelsattar Elbadawy, Elsayed Ali Omar, Mohammed Hosny AbdElaziz
{"title":"MicroCT evaluation for CAD/CAM occlusal veneer fit using two materials and three cement space settings.","authors":"Adel Abdelsattar Elbadawy,&nbsp;Elsayed Ali Omar,&nbsp;Mohammed Hosny AbdElaziz","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202204764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was aimed to evaluate the fit of occlusal veneer restoration for two CAD/CAM materials with different cement space settings, using microCT scans. Sixty resin dies were made and divided into two groups (n=30) according to the materials, (I): Hybrid all-ceramic, and (II): zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Each group was subdivided into three subgroups (n=10) according to the cement space parameters (30, 40, and 50 µm). Occlusal veneers for the six subgroups were milled. A circle with 20 different sections was placed at the center of every scanned specimen to measure four different locations (Occlusal, Axial, Marginal, and Absolute marginal discrepancy). Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA at a 0.05 level of significance. There was no statistically significant effect of material type on the mean values of internal and marginal gaps for the three cement space parameters (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the occlusal and axial gap between the cement space parameters, furthermore, there were statistically significant differences in marginal gap distances and absolute marginal discrepancies (P>0.05). Hybrid all-ceramic showed smaller marginal and internal discrepancies than zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic without statistically significant differences, and, for both materials, 50 µm cement space significantly improved the marginal fit and absolute marginal discrepancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9211,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"33 4","pages":"71-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate the fit of occlusal veneer restoration for two CAD/CAM materials with different cement space settings, using microCT scans. Sixty resin dies were made and divided into two groups (n=30) according to the materials, (I): Hybrid all-ceramic, and (II): zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Each group was subdivided into three subgroups (n=10) according to the cement space parameters (30, 40, and 50 µm). Occlusal veneers for the six subgroups were milled. A circle with 20 different sections was placed at the center of every scanned specimen to measure four different locations (Occlusal, Axial, Marginal, and Absolute marginal discrepancy). Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA at a 0.05 level of significance. There was no statistically significant effect of material type on the mean values of internal and marginal gaps for the three cement space parameters (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the occlusal and axial gap between the cement space parameters, furthermore, there were statistically significant differences in marginal gap distances and absolute marginal discrepancies (P>0.05). Hybrid all-ceramic showed smaller marginal and internal discrepancies than zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic without statistically significant differences, and, for both materials, 50 µm cement space significantly improved the marginal fit and absolute marginal discrepancy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用两种材料和三种水泥空间设置对CAD/CAM咬合贴面贴合的MicroCT评估。
本研究旨在通过微ct扫描评估两种CAD/CAM材料在不同骨水泥空间设置下的咬合贴面修复的配合度。制作了60个树脂模具,根据材料分为两组(n=30), (I):混合全陶瓷,(II):氧化锆增强硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷。每组根据水泥空间参数(30、40、50µm)再细分为3个亚组(n=10)。磨铣6个亚组的咬合贴面。在每个扫描标本的中心放置一个包含20个不同切片的圆圈,以测量四个不同的位置(咬合,轴向,边缘和绝对边缘差异)。数据分析采用双因素方差分析,显著性水平为0.05。材料类型对三种水泥间隙参数的内间隙和边缘间隙平均值的影响均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组间牙合间隙和轴向间隙参数差异无统计学意义,边缘间隙距离和绝对边缘差异有统计学意义(P>0.05)。与氧化锆增强的硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷相比,杂化全陶瓷的边际和内部差异更小,但差异无统计学意义,而且对于两种材料,50µm水泥空间显著改善了边际配合和绝对边际差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brazilian dental journal
Brazilian dental journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Dental Journal, publishes Full-Length Papers, Short Communications and Case Reports, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines and edited six times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信