Application of low-complexity generalized coherence factor to in vivo data.

Journal of Medical Ultrasonics (2001) Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-30 DOI:10.1007/s10396-022-01243-1
Masanori Hisatsu, Shohei Mori, Mototaka Arakawa, Hiroshi Kanai
{"title":"Application of low-complexity generalized coherence factor to in vivo data.","authors":"Masanori Hisatsu, Shohei Mori, Mototaka Arakawa, Hiroshi Kanai","doi":"10.1007/s10396-022-01243-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Beamforming using the generalized coherence factor (GCF) reduces sidelobe artifacts and provides an excellent contrast-to-noise ratio. We previously proposed GCF<sub>real</sub>, a method to calculate GCF without generating analytic signals, and GCF<sub>bin</sub>, a method to calculate GCF by binarizing the received signals. In this study, we applied these methods to in vivo data and showed the effect of the computational complexity reduction on contrast performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Channel RF data were acquired from the human liver and gallbladder. We set up several observation points in each data set and investigated the mechanism that causes the differences in contrast performance among the methods based on the signals and their power spectra in the channel direction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For GCF and GCF<sub>real</sub>, the obtained values were almost the same. However, there were large differences in GCF<sub>bin</sub> from GCF when the signals from the focus point or from outside the focus point were received on different channels. This is because the amplitudes of the signals with high coherence and those with low coherence were changed by binarizing the signals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While GCF<sub>bin</sub> can significantly reduce the computational complexity, there are differences in the values of GCF<sub>bin</sub> and GCF due to binarizing of the received signals. However, this difference resulted in GCF<sub>bin</sub> being superior to GCF in terms of artifact reduction. This is owing to the elimination of amplitude information in GCF<sub>bin</sub>, which makes it a new efficient coherence factor with different characteristics from GCF.</p>","PeriodicalId":111320,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics (2001)","volume":" ","pages":"555-567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics (2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-022-01243-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Beamforming using the generalized coherence factor (GCF) reduces sidelobe artifacts and provides an excellent contrast-to-noise ratio. We previously proposed GCFreal, a method to calculate GCF without generating analytic signals, and GCFbin, a method to calculate GCF by binarizing the received signals. In this study, we applied these methods to in vivo data and showed the effect of the computational complexity reduction on contrast performance.

Methods: Channel RF data were acquired from the human liver and gallbladder. We set up several observation points in each data set and investigated the mechanism that causes the differences in contrast performance among the methods based on the signals and their power spectra in the channel direction.

Results: For GCF and GCFreal, the obtained values were almost the same. However, there were large differences in GCFbin from GCF when the signals from the focus point or from outside the focus point were received on different channels. This is because the amplitudes of the signals with high coherence and those with low coherence were changed by binarizing the signals.

Conclusion: While GCFbin can significantly reduce the computational complexity, there are differences in the values of GCFbin and GCF due to binarizing of the received signals. However, this difference resulted in GCFbin being superior to GCF in terms of artifact reduction. This is owing to the elimination of amplitude information in GCFbin, which makes it a new efficient coherence factor with different characteristics from GCF.

低复杂度广义相干因子在体内数据中的应用。
目的:使用广义相干系数(GCF)的波束形成减少了副瓣伪影,并提供了良好的对比噪声比。我们之前提出了不产生解析信号计算GCF的方法GCFreal和通过接收信号二值化计算GCF的方法GCFbin。在本研究中,我们将这些方法应用于体内数据,并展示了计算复杂度降低对对比度性能的影响。方法:采集人肝胆通道射频数据。我们在每个数据集中设置多个观测点,并基于信号及其在信道方向上的功率谱,研究了导致不同方法对比度差异的机制。结果:GCF与GCFreal的测定值基本一致。然而,在不同的通道上接收来自焦点的信号和来自焦点外的信号时,GCFbin与GCF有很大的差异。这是因为对高相干信号和低相干信号进行二值化处理后,其幅值发生了变化。结论:虽然GCFbin可以显著降低计算复杂度,但由于接收信号的二值化,GCFbin与GCF的值存在差异。然而,这种差异导致GCFbin在伪影减少方面优于GCF。这是由于GCFbin中消除了幅度信息,使其成为一种新的高效相干因子,具有不同于GCF的特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书