{"title":"Application of low-complexity generalized coherence factor to in vivo data.","authors":"Masanori Hisatsu, Shohei Mori, Mototaka Arakawa, Hiroshi Kanai","doi":"10.1007/s10396-022-01243-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Beamforming using the generalized coherence factor (GCF) reduces sidelobe artifacts and provides an excellent contrast-to-noise ratio. We previously proposed GCF<sub>real</sub>, a method to calculate GCF without generating analytic signals, and GCF<sub>bin</sub>, a method to calculate GCF by binarizing the received signals. In this study, we applied these methods to in vivo data and showed the effect of the computational complexity reduction on contrast performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Channel RF data were acquired from the human liver and gallbladder. We set up several observation points in each data set and investigated the mechanism that causes the differences in contrast performance among the methods based on the signals and their power spectra in the channel direction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For GCF and GCF<sub>real</sub>, the obtained values were almost the same. However, there were large differences in GCF<sub>bin</sub> from GCF when the signals from the focus point or from outside the focus point were received on different channels. This is because the amplitudes of the signals with high coherence and those with low coherence were changed by binarizing the signals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While GCF<sub>bin</sub> can significantly reduce the computational complexity, there are differences in the values of GCF<sub>bin</sub> and GCF due to binarizing of the received signals. However, this difference resulted in GCF<sub>bin</sub> being superior to GCF in terms of artifact reduction. This is owing to the elimination of amplitude information in GCF<sub>bin</sub>, which makes it a new efficient coherence factor with different characteristics from GCF.</p>","PeriodicalId":111320,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics (2001)","volume":" ","pages":"555-567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics (2001)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-022-01243-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Beamforming using the generalized coherence factor (GCF) reduces sidelobe artifacts and provides an excellent contrast-to-noise ratio. We previously proposed GCFreal, a method to calculate GCF without generating analytic signals, and GCFbin, a method to calculate GCF by binarizing the received signals. In this study, we applied these methods to in vivo data and showed the effect of the computational complexity reduction on contrast performance.
Methods: Channel RF data were acquired from the human liver and gallbladder. We set up several observation points in each data set and investigated the mechanism that causes the differences in contrast performance among the methods based on the signals and their power spectra in the channel direction.
Results: For GCF and GCFreal, the obtained values were almost the same. However, there were large differences in GCFbin from GCF when the signals from the focus point or from outside the focus point were received on different channels. This is because the amplitudes of the signals with high coherence and those with low coherence were changed by binarizing the signals.
Conclusion: While GCFbin can significantly reduce the computational complexity, there are differences in the values of GCFbin and GCF due to binarizing of the received signals. However, this difference resulted in GCFbin being superior to GCF in terms of artifact reduction. This is owing to the elimination of amplitude information in GCFbin, which makes it a new efficient coherence factor with different characteristics from GCF.