Effect of artificial cycle with or without GnRH-a pretreatment on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women with PCOS after frozen embryo transfer: a propensity score matching study.

Yue Wang, Wen-Hui Hu, Qi Wan, Tian Li, Yue Qian, Ming-Xing Chen, Xiao-Jun Tang, Qian Feng, Xiang-Qian Meng, Enoch Appiah Adu-Gyamfi, Yu-Bin Ding, Li-Hong Geng, Xing-Yu Lv, Zhao-Hui Zhong
{"title":"Effect of artificial cycle with or without GnRH-a pretreatment on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women with PCOS after frozen embryo transfer: a propensity score matching study.","authors":"Yue Wang,&nbsp;Wen-Hui Hu,&nbsp;Qi Wan,&nbsp;Tian Li,&nbsp;Yue Qian,&nbsp;Ming-Xing Chen,&nbsp;Xiao-Jun Tang,&nbsp;Qian Feng,&nbsp;Xiang-Qian Meng,&nbsp;Enoch Appiah Adu-Gyamfi,&nbsp;Yu-Bin Ding,&nbsp;Li-Hong Geng,&nbsp;Xing-Yu Lv,&nbsp;Zhao-Hui Zhong","doi":"10.1186/s12958-022-00929-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In frozen embryo transfer (FET), there is limited consensus on the best means of endometrial preparation in terms of the reproductive outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The present study aimed to compare the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following artificial cycle FET (AC-FET) with or without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) pretreatment among women with PCOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 4503 FET cycles that satisfied the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study between 2015 and 2020. The GnRH-a group received GnRH-a pretreatment while the AC-FET group did not. Propensity score matching (PSM) method and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to adjust for potential confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, women in the GnRH-a group suffered a significantly lower miscarriage rate (11.2% vs. 17.1%, P = 0.033) and a higher live birth rate (LBR) compared with those in the AC-FET group (63.1% vs. 56.8%, P = 0.043). No differences were observed in the rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy between the two groups. A higher mean gestational age at birth was observed in the GnRH-a group than in the AC-FET group (39.80 ± 2.01 vs. 38.17 ± 2.13, P = 0.009). The incidence of neonatal preterm birth (PTB) in the GnRH-a group was lower than that in the AC-FET group (7.4% vs. 14.9%, P = 0.009). Singleton newborns conceived after GnRH-a group were more likely to be small for gestational age (SGA) than those born after AC-FET group (16.4% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.009). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of mean birthweight, apgar score, the rates of macrosomia, large for gestational age and low birth weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>In women with PCOS who underwent AC-FET, GnRH-a pretreatment was significantly associated with a higher live birth rate and a reduced risk of neonatal PTB. However, there was a concomitant increase in the risk of developing SGA babies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520764,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E","volume":" ","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953331/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00929-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: In frozen embryo transfer (FET), there is limited consensus on the best means of endometrial preparation in terms of the reproductive outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The present study aimed to compare the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following artificial cycle FET (AC-FET) with or without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) pretreatment among women with PCOS.

Methods: A total of 4503 FET cycles that satisfied the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study between 2015 and 2020. The GnRH-a group received GnRH-a pretreatment while the AC-FET group did not. Propensity score matching (PSM) method and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to adjust for potential confounding factors.

Results: After PSM, women in the GnRH-a group suffered a significantly lower miscarriage rate (11.2% vs. 17.1%, P = 0.033) and a higher live birth rate (LBR) compared with those in the AC-FET group (63.1% vs. 56.8%, P = 0.043). No differences were observed in the rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy between the two groups. A higher mean gestational age at birth was observed in the GnRH-a group than in the AC-FET group (39.80 ± 2.01 vs. 38.17 ± 2.13, P = 0.009). The incidence of neonatal preterm birth (PTB) in the GnRH-a group was lower than that in the AC-FET group (7.4% vs. 14.9%, P = 0.009). Singleton newborns conceived after GnRH-a group were more likely to be small for gestational age (SGA) than those born after AC-FET group (16.4% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.009). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of mean birthweight, apgar score, the rates of macrosomia, large for gestational age and low birth weight.

Conclusion(s): In women with PCOS who underwent AC-FET, GnRH-a pretreatment was significantly associated with a higher live birth rate and a reduced risk of neonatal PTB. However, there was a concomitant increase in the risk of developing SGA babies.

Abstract Image

人工周期加或不加GnRH-a预处理对PCOS患者冷冻胚胎移植后妊娠和新生儿结局的影响:倾向评分匹配研究
背景:在冷冻胚胎移植(FET)中,就多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)妇女的生殖结局而言,关于子宫内膜准备的最佳方法的共识有限。本研究旨在比较PCOS女性人工周期FET (AC-FET)加或不加促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)预处理后的妊娠和新生儿结局。方法:在2015年至2020年期间,共有4503个满足纳入标准的FET周期被纳入这项回顾性队列研究。GnRH-a组接受GnRH-a预处理,AC-FET组不接受预处理。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)方法和多因素logistic回归分析来调整潜在的混杂因素。结果:与AC-FET组相比,PSM后GnRH-a组的流产率(11.2% vs. 17.1%, P = 0.033)显著降低,活产率(LBR)显著提高(63.1% vs. 56.8%, P = 0.043)。两组患者的生化妊娠、临床妊娠、异位妊娠发生率均无差异。GnRH-a组出生时平均胎龄高于AC-FET组(39.80±2.01∶38.17±2.13,P = 0.009)。GnRH-a组新生儿早产(PTB)发生率低于AC-FET组(7.4% vs. 14.9%, P = 0.009)。与AC-FET组相比,GnRH-a组出生的单胎新生儿更容易出现小胎龄(SGA) (16.4% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.009)。然而,两组在平均出生体重、apgar评分、巨大儿率、大胎龄和低出生体重方面没有显著差异。结论:在接受AC-FET治疗的PCOS患者中,GnRH-a预处理与更高的活产率和新生儿PTB风险降低显著相关。然而,发育SGA婴儿的风险也随之增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信