Ana B Maldonado-Cárceles, Mª Antonia Belmonte Gómez, Mª Luisa Cascales Pérez, Mª Ángeles Sánchez Morales, Joaquín Granados Ortega, María Huertas Gilberte Martínez, Mª Vicenta Labrador Cañadas, Olga Monteagudo-Piqueras
{"title":"[Acceptability of self-sampling as a method for cervical cancer screening among women from the Region of Murcia (Spain).]","authors":"Ana B Maldonado-Cárceles, Mª Antonia Belmonte Gómez, Mª Luisa Cascales Pérez, Mª Ángeles Sánchez Morales, Joaquín Granados Ortega, María Huertas Gilberte Martínez, Mª Vicenta Labrador Cañadas, Olga Monteagudo-Piqueras","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Current literature is insufficient to determine the acceptability of self-sampling as a primary method for cervical cancer screening among women from a regular screening population. The aim of this study was to determine the acceptability of self-sampling among women in the Region of Murcia as a primary screening tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional study between April-May 2021, in a regional sample of 247 women ages 35-65 years. All participants were contacted and completed a survey by telephone which included sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge and attitudes towards cancer screening, and self-sampling assessment. We conducted weighted statistical analysis including descriptive, bivariate and a multivariate logistic regression model to examine the associations between women's characteristics and their preference for self-sampling compared to clinician sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89.4% of participants reported at least one previous cytology in the last 5 years, 88.7% with a frequency equal to or less than 3 years. Eighty-one percent of women preferred self-sampling over clinical sampling as a primary screening method. Basal characteristics were unrelated to women's preference for self-sampling (P-adjusted≥0.05). Feasibility and reliability were the main concerns perceived in relation to self-sampling (23.3% and 14.8%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acceptability of self-sampling was high among women in the Region of Murcia. Self-sampling in conjunction with an adequate educational strategy could be a suitable approach to consider in the cervical cancer screening program.</p>","PeriodicalId":47152,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Current literature is insufficient to determine the acceptability of self-sampling as a primary method for cervical cancer screening among women from a regular screening population. The aim of this study was to determine the acceptability of self-sampling among women in the Region of Murcia as a primary screening tool.
Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study between April-May 2021, in a regional sample of 247 women ages 35-65 years. All participants were contacted and completed a survey by telephone which included sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge and attitudes towards cancer screening, and self-sampling assessment. We conducted weighted statistical analysis including descriptive, bivariate and a multivariate logistic regression model to examine the associations between women's characteristics and their preference for self-sampling compared to clinician sampling.
Results: A total of 89.4% of participants reported at least one previous cytology in the last 5 years, 88.7% with a frequency equal to or less than 3 years. Eighty-one percent of women preferred self-sampling over clinical sampling as a primary screening method. Basal characteristics were unrelated to women's preference for self-sampling (P-adjusted≥0.05). Feasibility and reliability were the main concerns perceived in relation to self-sampling (23.3% and 14.8%, respectively).
Conclusions: Acceptability of self-sampling was high among women in the Region of Murcia. Self-sampling in conjunction with an adequate educational strategy could be a suitable approach to consider in the cervical cancer screening program.