[Acceptability of self-sampling as a method for cervical cancer screening among women from the Region of Murcia (Spain).]

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica Pub Date : 2022-03-25
Ana B Maldonado-Cárceles, Mª Antonia Belmonte Gómez, Mª Luisa Cascales Pérez, Mª Ángeles Sánchez Morales, Joaquín Granados Ortega, María Huertas Gilberte Martínez, Mª Vicenta Labrador Cañadas, Olga Monteagudo-Piqueras
{"title":"[Acceptability of self-sampling as a method for cervical cancer screening among women from the Region of Murcia (Spain).]","authors":"Ana B Maldonado-Cárceles,&nbsp;Mª Antonia Belmonte Gómez,&nbsp;Mª Luisa Cascales Pérez,&nbsp;Mª Ángeles Sánchez Morales,&nbsp;Joaquín Granados Ortega,&nbsp;María Huertas Gilberte Martínez,&nbsp;Mª Vicenta Labrador Cañadas,&nbsp;Olga Monteagudo-Piqueras","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Current literature is insufficient to determine the acceptability of self-sampling as a primary method for cervical cancer screening among women from a regular screening population. The aim of this study was to determine the acceptability of self-sampling among women in the Region of Murcia as a primary screening tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional study between April-May 2021, in a regional sample of 247 women ages 35-65 years. All participants were contacted and completed a survey by telephone which included sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge and attitudes towards cancer screening, and self-sampling assessment. We conducted weighted statistical analysis including descriptive, bivariate and a multivariate logistic regression model to examine the associations between women's characteristics and their preference for self-sampling compared to clinician sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89.4% of participants reported at least one previous cytology in the last 5 years, 88.7% with a frequency equal to or less than 3 years. Eighty-one percent of women preferred self-sampling over clinical sampling as a primary screening method. Basal characteristics were unrelated to women's preference for self-sampling (P-adjusted≥0.05). Feasibility and reliability were the main concerns perceived in relation to self-sampling (23.3% and 14.8%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acceptability of self-sampling was high among women in the Region of Murcia. Self-sampling in conjunction with an adequate educational strategy could be a suitable approach to consider in the cervical cancer screening program.</p>","PeriodicalId":47152,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Current literature is insufficient to determine the acceptability of self-sampling as a primary method for cervical cancer screening among women from a regular screening population. The aim of this study was to determine the acceptability of self-sampling among women in the Region of Murcia as a primary screening tool.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study between April-May 2021, in a regional sample of 247 women ages 35-65 years. All participants were contacted and completed a survey by telephone which included sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge and attitudes towards cancer screening, and self-sampling assessment. We conducted weighted statistical analysis including descriptive, bivariate and a multivariate logistic regression model to examine the associations between women's characteristics and their preference for self-sampling compared to clinician sampling.

Results: A total of 89.4% of participants reported at least one previous cytology in the last 5 years, 88.7% with a frequency equal to or less than 3 years. Eighty-one percent of women preferred self-sampling over clinical sampling as a primary screening method. Basal characteristics were unrelated to women's preference for self-sampling (P-adjusted≥0.05). Feasibility and reliability were the main concerns perceived in relation to self-sampling (23.3% and 14.8%, respectively).

Conclusions: Acceptability of self-sampling was high among women in the Region of Murcia. Self-sampling in conjunction with an adequate educational strategy could be a suitable approach to consider in the cervical cancer screening program.

[在穆尔西亚地区(西班牙)妇女中自我抽样作为宫颈癌筛查方法的可接受性]
目的:目前的文献不足以确定自抽样作为常规筛查人群中女性宫颈癌筛查的主要方法的可接受性。本研究的目的是确定穆尔西亚地区妇女自我抽样作为主要筛查工具的可接受性。方法:我们在2021年4月至5月期间对247名年龄在35-65岁之间的女性进行了横断面研究。所有参与者都通过电话联系并完成了一项调查,其中包括社会人口学特征,对癌症筛查的知识和态度,以及自我抽样评估。我们进行了加权统计分析,包括描述性、双变量和多变量逻辑回归模型,以检验女性特征与她们对自我抽样的偏好与临床医生抽样之间的关系。结果:共有89.4%的参与者报告在过去5年中至少有一次细胞学检查,88.7%的频率等于或少于3年。81%的女性更喜欢自我抽样而不是临床抽样作为主要的筛查方法。基础特征与女性对自我抽样的偏好无关(p校正≥0.05)。可行性和可靠性是人们认为与自抽样相关的主要问题(分别为23.3%和14.8%)。结论:穆尔西亚地区妇女自我抽样接受度较高。自我抽样结合适当的教育策略可能是宫颈癌筛查计划中考虑的合适方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信