Using FFF Beams to Improve the Therapeutic Ratio of Lung SBRT.

IF 0.3 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-30 DOI:10.1017/s1460396920000576
Oleg N Vassiliev, Christine B Peterson, Joe Y Chang, Radhe Mohan
{"title":"Using FFF Beams to Improve the Therapeutic Ratio of Lung SBRT.","authors":"Oleg N Vassiliev,&nbsp;Christine B Peterson,&nbsp;Joe Y Chang,&nbsp;Radhe Mohan","doi":"10.1017/s1460396920000576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the extent to which lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans can be improved by replacing conventional flattening filter (FF) beams with flattening filter-free (FFF) beams.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We selected 15 patients who had received SBRT with conventional 6-MV photon beams for early-stage lung cancer. We imported the patients' treatment plans into the Eclipse 13.6 treatment planning system, in which we configured the AAA dose calculation model using representative beam data for a TrueBeam accelerator operated in 6-MV FFF mode. We then created new treatment plans by replacing the conventional FF beams in the original plans with FFF beams.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FFF plans had better target coverage than the original FF plans did. For the planning target volume, FFF plans significantly improved the D<sub>98</sub>, D<sub>95</sub>, D<sub>90</sub>, homogeneity index, and uncomplicated tumor control probability. In most cases, the doses to organs at risk were lower in FFF plans. FFF plans significantly reduced the mean lung dose, V<sub>10</sub>, V<sub>20</sub>, V<sub>30</sub>, and normal tissue complication probability for the total lung and improved the dosimetric indices for the ipsilateral lung. For most patients, FFF beams achieved lower maximum doses to the esophagus, heart, and the spinal cord; and a lower chest wall V<sub>30</sub>.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Compared with FF beams, FFF beams achieved lower doses to organs at risk, especially the lung, without compromising tumor coverage; in fact, FFF beams improved coverage in most cases. Thus, replacing FF beams with FFF beams can achieve a better therapeutic ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":44597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s1460396920000576","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1460396920000576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the extent to which lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans can be improved by replacing conventional flattening filter (FF) beams with flattening filter-free (FFF) beams.

Material and methods: We selected 15 patients who had received SBRT with conventional 6-MV photon beams for early-stage lung cancer. We imported the patients' treatment plans into the Eclipse 13.6 treatment planning system, in which we configured the AAA dose calculation model using representative beam data for a TrueBeam accelerator operated in 6-MV FFF mode. We then created new treatment plans by replacing the conventional FF beams in the original plans with FFF beams.

Results: The FFF plans had better target coverage than the original FF plans did. For the planning target volume, FFF plans significantly improved the D98, D95, D90, homogeneity index, and uncomplicated tumor control probability. In most cases, the doses to organs at risk were lower in FFF plans. FFF plans significantly reduced the mean lung dose, V10, V20, V30, and normal tissue complication probability for the total lung and improved the dosimetric indices for the ipsilateral lung. For most patients, FFF beams achieved lower maximum doses to the esophagus, heart, and the spinal cord; and a lower chest wall V30.

Findings: Compared with FF beams, FFF beams achieved lower doses to organs at risk, especially the lung, without compromising tumor coverage; in fact, FFF beams improved coverage in most cases. Thus, replacing FF beams with FFF beams can achieve a better therapeutic ratio.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用FFF束提高肺部SBRT的治疗率。
目的:探讨用无压平滤波(FFF)光束替代常规压平滤波(FF)光束对肺立体定向放疗(SBRT)治疗方案的改善程度。材料和方法:我们选择了15例接受常规6 mv光子束SBRT治疗的早期肺癌患者。我们将患者的治疗方案导入到Eclipse 13.6治疗计划系统中,在该系统中,我们为运行在6 mv FFF模式下的TrueBeam加速器配置了具有代表性的光束数据的AAA剂量计算模型。然后,我们创建了新的治疗方案,用FFF梁代替原方案中的传统FF梁。结果:FFF计划比原FF计划有更好的目标覆盖率。对于规划靶体积,FFF方案显著提高了D98、D95、D90、均匀性指数和无复杂肿瘤控制概率。在大多数情况下,FFF计划中对危险器官的剂量较低。FFF方案显著降低全肺平均肺剂量、V10、V20、V30及正常组织并发症概率,改善同侧肺剂量学指标。对于大多数患者,FFF光束对食道、心脏和脊髓的最大剂量较低;下胸壁V30。结果:与FF束相比,FFF束对危险器官(尤其是肺)的剂量较低,且不影响肿瘤覆盖;事实上,FFF波束在大多数情况下提高了覆盖范围。因此,用FFF光束代替FF光束可以获得更好的治疗比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice is a peer-reviewed journal covering all of the current modalities specific to clinical oncology and radiotherapy. The journal aims to publish research from a wide range of styles and encourage debate and the exchange of information and opinion from within the field of radiotherapy practice and clinical oncology. The journal also aims to encourage technical evaluations and case studies as well as equipment reviews that will be of interest to an international radiotherapy audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信