Water as Veneering Modeling Liquid Affects Microhardness of Glassy Matrix Veneering Ceramic.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
M Amaral, T M B Campos, T Takahashi, G S D Moura, G F Ramos, R M D Melo, M Özcan
{"title":"Water as Veneering Modeling Liquid Affects Microhardness of Glassy Matrix Veneering Ceramic.","authors":"M Amaral,&nbsp;T M B Campos,&nbsp;T Takahashi,&nbsp;G S D Moura,&nbsp;G F Ramos,&nbsp;R M D Melo,&nbsp;M Özcan","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2372Amaral05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of different veneering liquids used for modeling on microhardness, fracture toughness and biaxial flexural strength of a glass-veneering ceramic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The manufacturer recommended modeling liquid (ML), distilled water (DW), isopropyl alcohol (IA), 0.5% (P05), 1% (P1), and 2% (P2) polyethylene glycol solutions were mixed with feldspathic ceramic powder to form disc-shaped samples (n=20, 15 mm × 1.2 mm). After sintering, samples were mirror-polished and subjected to Vickers indentation (n=5) for measurement of microhardness and fracture toughness. The remaining 15 samples from each group were subjected to biaxial flexural strength. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Weibull analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The microhardness was affected by veneering liquid (p=0.002): DW promoted higher microhardness values than ML and IA. Fracture toughness (p=0.301) and flexural strength (p=0.930) were not affected by the veneering liquid but Weibull parameters were affected. All groups presented surface pores under high magnification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though the use of DW led to higher values of surface microhardness than the ML, all obtained values are inside the range of enamel microhardness values reported in the literature. Such parameters may affect antagonist wear and should be reported in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2372Amaral05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/aim: To evaluate the effect of different veneering liquids used for modeling on microhardness, fracture toughness and biaxial flexural strength of a glass-veneering ceramic.

Material and methods: The manufacturer recommended modeling liquid (ML), distilled water (DW), isopropyl alcohol (IA), 0.5% (P05), 1% (P1), and 2% (P2) polyethylene glycol solutions were mixed with feldspathic ceramic powder to form disc-shaped samples (n=20, 15 mm × 1.2 mm). After sintering, samples were mirror-polished and subjected to Vickers indentation (n=5) for measurement of microhardness and fracture toughness. The remaining 15 samples from each group were subjected to biaxial flexural strength. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Weibull analysis.

Results: The microhardness was affected by veneering liquid (p=0.002): DW promoted higher microhardness values than ML and IA. Fracture toughness (p=0.301) and flexural strength (p=0.930) were not affected by the veneering liquid but Weibull parameters were affected. All groups presented surface pores under high magnification.

Conclusion: Even though the use of DW led to higher values of surface microhardness than the ML, all obtained values are inside the range of enamel microhardness values reported in the literature. Such parameters may affect antagonist wear and should be reported in clinical trials.

水作为贴面模拟液对玻璃基贴面陶瓷显微硬度的影响
目的:评价不同贴面液对玻璃贴面陶瓷显微硬度、断裂韧性和双轴抗折强度的影响。材料和方法:制造商推荐的建模液(ML)、蒸馏水(DW)、异丙醇(IA)、0.5% (P05)、1% (P1)和2% (P2)聚乙二醇溶液与长石陶瓷粉混合,形成圆盘状样品(n=20、15 mm × 1.2 mm)。烧结后,对样品进行镜面抛光,并进行维氏压痕(n=5)测量显微硬度和断裂韧性。每组剩余15个试件进行双轴抗弯强度试验。数据采用单因素方差分析和威布尔分析。结果:贴面液对牙体显微硬度有影响(p=0.002): DW对牙体显微硬度的影响高于ML和IA。贴面液对断裂韧性(p=0.301)和抗弯强度(p=0.930)没有影响,但对威布尔参数有影响。高倍镜下各组表面均有气孔。结论:虽然DW的使用导致表面显微硬度值高于ML,但所获得的数值均在文献报道的牙釉质显微硬度值范围内。这些参数可能影响拮抗剂的磨损,应在临床试验中报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信