Who are hikikomori? Demographic and clinical features of hikikomori (prolonged social withdrawal): A systematic review.

Shunsuke Nonaka, Tomoya Takeda, Motohiro Sakai
{"title":"Who are hikikomori? Demographic and clinical features of hikikomori (prolonged social withdrawal): A systematic review.","authors":"Shunsuke Nonaka, Tomoya Takeda, Motohiro Sakai","doi":"10.1177/00048674221085917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review, which was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021237988), aimed to systematically extract common elements in the hikikomori definition or criteria applied by researchers and examine cultural differences and chronological changes in the demographic characteristics of hikikomori individuals such as age, gender and hikikomori duration.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For inclusion in the review, the hikikomori criteria, age and gender of the hikikomori individuals had to be specified, and the article had to be peer-reviewed and written in Japanese or English, focusing on hikikomori individuals or their families. Case studies, reviews and qualitative studies were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total sample size for the 52 studies included in the review was 4744. Over 80% of the studies included the elements 'not working or attending school', 'not socializing outside one's home' and 'duration of hikikomori' in their hikikomori criteria, and many studies included the element 'staying at home on most days except solitary outings'. A cross-temporal meta-analysis showed the possibility that the age of hikikomori individuals increased chronologically (β = 0.44, B = 0.50, 95% confidence interval = [0.16, 0.84]). Comparisons weighted by sample size between Japan and other countries showed the possibility that the age of hikikomori individuals was higher (<i>d</i> = 0.32), the percentage of males was lower (<i>d</i> = 0.91) and the hikikomori duration was shorter (<i>d</i> = 2.06) in studies conducted in countries other than Japan. However, many of the included studies had a high risk of selection bias, and this bias may have influenced the results obtained. Thus, the results of this study may represent the researcher's perception of hikikomori rather than accurately representing the actual condition of hikikomori.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Researchers should specifically identify similarities and differences in the clinical picture of hikikomori and compare the studies to organize the findings derived from studies focusing on hikikomori.</p>","PeriodicalId":117457,"journal":{"name":"The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1542-1554"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674221085917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This review, which was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021237988), aimed to systematically extract common elements in the hikikomori definition or criteria applied by researchers and examine cultural differences and chronological changes in the demographic characteristics of hikikomori individuals such as age, gender and hikikomori duration.

Method: For inclusion in the review, the hikikomori criteria, age and gender of the hikikomori individuals had to be specified, and the article had to be peer-reviewed and written in Japanese or English, focusing on hikikomori individuals or their families. Case studies, reviews and qualitative studies were excluded.

Results: The total sample size for the 52 studies included in the review was 4744. Over 80% of the studies included the elements 'not working or attending school', 'not socializing outside one's home' and 'duration of hikikomori' in their hikikomori criteria, and many studies included the element 'staying at home on most days except solitary outings'. A cross-temporal meta-analysis showed the possibility that the age of hikikomori individuals increased chronologically (β = 0.44, B = 0.50, 95% confidence interval = [0.16, 0.84]). Comparisons weighted by sample size between Japan and other countries showed the possibility that the age of hikikomori individuals was higher (d = 0.32), the percentage of males was lower (d = 0.91) and the hikikomori duration was shorter (d = 2.06) in studies conducted in countries other than Japan. However, many of the included studies had a high risk of selection bias, and this bias may have influenced the results obtained. Thus, the results of this study may represent the researcher's perception of hikikomori rather than accurately representing the actual condition of hikikomori.

Conclusion: Researchers should specifically identify similarities and differences in the clinical picture of hikikomori and compare the studies to organize the findings derived from studies focusing on hikikomori.

谁是“隐蔽青年”?“隐蔽青年”(长时间社交退缩)的人口学和临床特征:一项系统综述。
目的:本综述已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42021237988),旨在系统地提取研究人员使用的“隐蔽青年”定义或标准中的共同要素,并研究文化差异和年龄、性别和“隐蔽青年”持续时间等隐蔽青年个体人口统计学特征的时间变化。方法:要纳入综述,必须明确“隐蔽青年”个体的标准、年龄和性别,文章必须经过同行评议,用日语或英语撰写,重点关注“隐蔽青年”个体或其家庭。个案研究、综述和定性研究被排除在外。结果:纳入综述的52项研究的总样本量为4744。超过80%的研究将“不工作或不上学”、“不在家外社交”和“蛰居时间”纳入了他们的蛰居标准,许多研究还将“除了单独外出,大部分时间都待在家里”纳入了标准。跨时间荟萃分析显示,“隐蔽青年”个体的年龄可能随时间增长而增加(β = 0.44, B = 0.50, 95%可信区间=[0.16,0.84])。在日本和其他国家之间按样本量加权的比较表明,在日本以外的国家进行的研究中,隐蔽青年个体的年龄可能更高(d = 0.32),男性比例可能更低(d = 0.91),而隐蔽青年持续时间可能更短(d = 2.06)。然而,许多纳入的研究存在较高的选择偏倚风险,这种偏倚可能影响了所获得的结果。因此,本研究的结果可能代表了研究者对“隐蔽青年”的感知,而不是准确地代表了“隐蔽青年”的实际情况。结论:研究人员应明确识别“隐蔽青年”临床表现的异同点,并对研究结果进行比较,整理以“隐蔽青年”为重点的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书