Risk of venous thromboembolism during the use of oral estrogen-progestogen hormone therapies in light of most recent research findings.

IF 1.7 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Przeglad Menopauzalny Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-01 DOI:10.5114/pm.2022.119861
Małgorzata Bińkowska, Artur Jakimiuk, Tomasz Paszkowski, Leszek Pawelczyk, Violetta Skrzypulec-Plinta
{"title":"Risk of venous thromboembolism during the use of oral estrogen-progestogen hormone therapies in light of most recent research findings.","authors":"Małgorzata Bińkowska,&nbsp;Artur Jakimiuk,&nbsp;Tomasz Paszkowski,&nbsp;Leszek Pawelczyk,&nbsp;Violetta Skrzypulec-Plinta","doi":"10.5114/pm.2022.119861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two important studies evaluating the safety profile of oral estrogen-progestogen hormonal therapies conducted in standard clinical practice with respect to the venous system were recently published. A large prospective controlled cohort study (PRO-E2) based on the non-inferiority design has shown that the relative risk of developing venous thrombosis (VTE) in women using combined oral hormonal contraceptives (COHC) containing 17β-estradiol (1.5 mg) and nomegestrol acetate (2.5 mg) (E2/NOMAC) was not statistically different from that in users of COHC containing ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel (EE/LNG). The aim of the recently presented study was to compare the risk of VTE in patients treated with a product for oral continuous combined menopausal hormone therapy containing 1 mg of 17ß-estradiol and 100 mg of micronized progesterone (1 mgE2/100 mgP4) with patients taking conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate (CEE/MPA). The study was based on an analysis of records retrieved from a US health insurance database, and was therefore concerned the real-life clinical practice. The hazard ratio of VTE when comparing 1 mgE2/100 mgP4 with CEE/MPA was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.53-0.92). The difference was found to be statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The rewieved studies provide further evidence that the use of hormones bioidentical with endogenous steroids in oral contraception and menopausal hormone therapy creates an opportunity to combine high efficacy with a favorable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":55643,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Menopauzalny","volume":" ","pages":"197-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/12/MR-21-47897.PMC9551365.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Menopauzalny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2022.119861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Two important studies evaluating the safety profile of oral estrogen-progestogen hormonal therapies conducted in standard clinical practice with respect to the venous system were recently published. A large prospective controlled cohort study (PRO-E2) based on the non-inferiority design has shown that the relative risk of developing venous thrombosis (VTE) in women using combined oral hormonal contraceptives (COHC) containing 17β-estradiol (1.5 mg) and nomegestrol acetate (2.5 mg) (E2/NOMAC) was not statistically different from that in users of COHC containing ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel (EE/LNG). The aim of the recently presented study was to compare the risk of VTE in patients treated with a product for oral continuous combined menopausal hormone therapy containing 1 mg of 17ß-estradiol and 100 mg of micronized progesterone (1 mgE2/100 mgP4) with patients taking conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate (CEE/MPA). The study was based on an analysis of records retrieved from a US health insurance database, and was therefore concerned the real-life clinical practice. The hazard ratio of VTE when comparing 1 mgE2/100 mgP4 with CEE/MPA was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.53-0.92). The difference was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). The rewieved studies provide further evidence that the use of hormones bioidentical with endogenous steroids in oral contraception and menopausal hormone therapy creates an opportunity to combine high efficacy with a favorable safety profile.

根据最近的研究结果,口服雌激素-孕激素治疗期间静脉血栓栓塞的风险。
最近发表了两项重要的研究,评估了在标准临床实践中进行的口服雌激素-孕激素治疗对静脉系统的安全性。一项基于非效性设计的大型前瞻性对照队列研究(PRO-E2)显示,使用含有17β-雌二醇(1.5 mg)和醋酸异孕酮(2.5 mg) (E2/NOMAC)的联合口服激素避孕药(COHC)的女性发生静脉血栓形成(VTE)的相对风险与使用含有炔雌醇和左炔诺孕酮(EE/LNG)的COHC的女性没有统计学差异。最近提出的这项研究的目的是比较口服持续联合绝经期激素治疗产品(含1 mg 17ß-雌二醇和100 mg微孕酮(1 mgE2/100 mgP4))的患者与服用共轭马雌激素和醋酸甲孕酮(CEE/MPA)的患者发生静脉血栓栓塞的风险。该研究基于对美国健康保险数据库中检索到的记录的分析,因此与现实生活中的临床实践有关。1 mgE2/100 mgP4与CEE/MPA的VTE风险比为0.70 (95% CI: 0.53 ~ 0.92)。差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。所回顾的研究提供了进一步的证据,证明在口服避孕药和绝经期激素治疗中使用与内源性类固醇具有生物同质性的激素,创造了将高效率与良好的安全性结合起来的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Przeglad Menopauzalny
Przeglad Menopauzalny OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Menopausal Review is a scientific bimonthly aimed at gynecologists and endocrinologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信