Ticagrelor monotherapy after PCI in patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease: TWILIGHT DM-CKD.

Payam Dehghani, Davide Cao, Usman Baber, Johny Nicolas, Samantha Sartori, Carlo A Pivato, Zhongjie Zhang, George Dangas, Dominick J Angiolillo, Carlo Briguori, David J Cohen, Timothy Collier, Dariusz Dudek, Michael Gibson, Robert Gil, Kurt Huber, Upendra Kaul, Ran Kornowski, Mitchell W Krucoff, Vijay Kunadian, Shamir Mehta, David J Moliterno, E Magnus Ohman, Javier Escaned, Gennaro Sardella, Samin K Sharma, Richard Shlofmitz, Giora Weisz, Bernhard Witzenbichler, Stuart Pocock, Roxana Mehran
{"title":"Ticagrelor monotherapy after PCI in patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease: TWILIGHT DM-CKD.","authors":"Payam Dehghani,&nbsp;Davide Cao,&nbsp;Usman Baber,&nbsp;Johny Nicolas,&nbsp;Samantha Sartori,&nbsp;Carlo A Pivato,&nbsp;Zhongjie Zhang,&nbsp;George Dangas,&nbsp;Dominick J Angiolillo,&nbsp;Carlo Briguori,&nbsp;David J Cohen,&nbsp;Timothy Collier,&nbsp;Dariusz Dudek,&nbsp;Michael Gibson,&nbsp;Robert Gil,&nbsp;Kurt Huber,&nbsp;Upendra Kaul,&nbsp;Ran Kornowski,&nbsp;Mitchell W Krucoff,&nbsp;Vijay Kunadian,&nbsp;Shamir Mehta,&nbsp;David J Moliterno,&nbsp;E Magnus Ohman,&nbsp;Javier Escaned,&nbsp;Gennaro Sardella,&nbsp;Samin K Sharma,&nbsp;Richard Shlofmitz,&nbsp;Giora Weisz,&nbsp;Bernhard Witzenbichler,&nbsp;Stuart Pocock,&nbsp;Roxana Mehran","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the treatment effects of ticagrelor monotherapy in the very high risk cohort of patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor with Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention) trial, after 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor and aspirin post-PCI, event-free patients were randomized to either aspirin or placebo in addition to ticagrelor for 12 months. Those with available information on DM and CKD status were included in this subanalysis and were stratified by the presence or absence of either condition: 3391 (54.1%) had neither DM nor CKD (DM-/CKD-), 1822 (29.0%) had DM only (DM+/CKD-), 561 (8.9%) had CKD only (DM-/CKD+), and 8.0% had both DM and CKD (DM+/CKD+). The incidence of the primary endpoint of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding did not differ according to DM/CKD status (P-trend = 0.13), but there was a significant increase in BARC 3 or 5 bleeding (P-trend &lt; 0.001) as well as the key secondary endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (P-trend &lt; 0.001). Ticagrelor plus placebo reduced bleeding events compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin across all four groups, including DM+/CKD+ patients with respect to BARC 2-5 [4.5% vs. 8.7%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-1.01] as well as BARC 3-5 (0.8% vs. 5.3%; HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.53) bleeding, with no evidence of heterogeneity. The risk of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was similar between treatment arms across all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Irrespective of the presence of DM, CKD, and their combination, ticagrelor monotherapy reduced the risk of bleeding without a significant increase in ischaemic events compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin.</p>","PeriodicalId":11995,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"707-716"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aims: We aimed to evaluate the treatment effects of ticagrelor monotherapy in the very high risk cohort of patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods and results: In the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor with Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention) trial, after 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor and aspirin post-PCI, event-free patients were randomized to either aspirin or placebo in addition to ticagrelor for 12 months. Those with available information on DM and CKD status were included in this subanalysis and were stratified by the presence or absence of either condition: 3391 (54.1%) had neither DM nor CKD (DM-/CKD-), 1822 (29.0%) had DM only (DM+/CKD-), 561 (8.9%) had CKD only (DM-/CKD+), and 8.0% had both DM and CKD (DM+/CKD+). The incidence of the primary endpoint of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding did not differ according to DM/CKD status (P-trend = 0.13), but there was a significant increase in BARC 3 or 5 bleeding (P-trend < 0.001) as well as the key secondary endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (P-trend < 0.001). Ticagrelor plus placebo reduced bleeding events compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin across all four groups, including DM+/CKD+ patients with respect to BARC 2-5 [4.5% vs. 8.7%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-1.01] as well as BARC 3-5 (0.8% vs. 5.3%; HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.53) bleeding, with no evidence of heterogeneity. The risk of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was similar between treatment arms across all groups.

Conclusion: Irrespective of the presence of DM, CKD, and their combination, ticagrelor monotherapy reduced the risk of bleeding without a significant increase in ischaemic events compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin.

替格瑞洛单药治疗合并糖尿病和慢性肾病的PCI患者:TWILIGHT DM-CKD
目的:我们旨在评估替格瑞洛单药治疗合并糖尿病(DM)和慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)的高危队列患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的治疗效果。方法和结果:在TWILIGHT(替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林或单独用于高危患者冠状动脉介入治疗)试验中,pci术后用替格瑞洛和阿司匹林进行3个月的双重抗血小板治疗后,无事件患者被随机分为阿司匹林或安慰剂组和替格瑞洛组12个月。有DM和CKD状态信息的人被纳入该亚分析,并根据存在或不存在这两种情况进行分层:3391(54.1%)既没有DM也没有CKD (DM-/CKD-), 1822(29.0%)只有DM (DM+/CKD-), 561(8.9%)只有CKD (DM-/CKD+), 8.0%同时患有DM和CKD (DM+/CKD+)。出血学术研究联盟(BARC) 2、3或5型出血的主要终点发生率根据DM/CKD状态没有差异(p趋势= 0.13),但BARC 3或5型出血的发生率显著增加(p趋势<0.001)以及死亡、心肌梗死或卒中等关键次要终点(P-trend <0.001)。在所有四组中,与替格瑞洛加阿司匹林相比,替格瑞洛加安慰剂减少了出血事件,包括DM+/CKD+患者的BARC 2-5 [4.5% vs. 8.7%;风险比(HR) 0.49, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.24-1.01]以及BARC 3-5 (0.8% vs. 5.3%;HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.53)出血,无异质性证据。在所有组的治疗组中,死亡、心肌梗死或中风的风险相似。结论:与替格瑞洛加阿司匹林相比,无论是否存在DM、CKD及其合并,替格瑞洛单药治疗均可降低出血风险,且缺血事件发生率无显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信