Effect of Clinically Relevant Smear Layers and pH of Universal Adhesives on Dentin Bond Strength and Durability.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hüseyin Hatırlı, Kaan Yerliyurt
{"title":"Effect of Clinically Relevant Smear Layers and pH of Universal Adhesives on Dentin Bond Strength and Durability.","authors":"Hüseyin Hatırlı, Kaan Yerliyurt","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b2838121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effects of different smear layers on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a reference two-step self-etch adhesive and two universal adhesives.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Mid-coronal dentin of 90 teeth was exposed and divided into three bur groups (coarse diamond, fine diamond, or tungsten carbide). Each bur-prepared group was further divided into three adhesive groups: Clearfil SE Bond (SE, Kuraray Noritake), Single Bond Universal (SB; 3M Oral Care), and G-Premio Bond (GP, GC). After adhesive application, 4-mm-thick resin composites were built up. Half of the teeth in each bur-adhesive group were used in immediate µTBS testing, and the others were tested after thermal aging (n = 5). Rectangular sticks were prepared using a low-speed diamond saw. For each tooth, 6 central sticks were used in the µTBS test. Statistical analysis was performed using three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SE presented higher µTBS than universal adhesives and SB presented higher µTBS than GP regardless of dentin surface preparation and thermal aging (p ˂ 0.05). For SE and SB, the tungsten carbide bur demonstrated higher immediate and aged µTBS than did the extra-fine diamond bur (p ˂ 0.05). The immediate µTBS was similar for GP with all bur types (p ˃ 0.05); the tungsten carbide and extra-fine diamond burs presented higher µTBS than did the coarse-diamond bur after thermal aging (p ˂ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dentin surface preparation and adhesive type had significant effects on µTBS. The smear layer created with an extra-fine diamond or tungsten carbide bur is favorable when mild and ultra-mild self-etch adhesives are used.</p>","PeriodicalId":55604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2838121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of different smear layers on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a reference two-step self-etch adhesive and two universal adhesives.

Materials and methods: Mid-coronal dentin of 90 teeth was exposed and divided into three bur groups (coarse diamond, fine diamond, or tungsten carbide). Each bur-prepared group was further divided into three adhesive groups: Clearfil SE Bond (SE, Kuraray Noritake), Single Bond Universal (SB; 3M Oral Care), and G-Premio Bond (GP, GC). After adhesive application, 4-mm-thick resin composites were built up. Half of the teeth in each bur-adhesive group were used in immediate µTBS testing, and the others were tested after thermal aging (n = 5). Rectangular sticks were prepared using a low-speed diamond saw. For each tooth, 6 central sticks were used in the µTBS test. Statistical analysis was performed using three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests (α = 0.05).

Results: SE presented higher µTBS than universal adhesives and SB presented higher µTBS than GP regardless of dentin surface preparation and thermal aging (p ˂ 0.05). For SE and SB, the tungsten carbide bur demonstrated higher immediate and aged µTBS than did the extra-fine diamond bur (p ˂ 0.05). The immediate µTBS was similar for GP with all bur types (p ˃ 0.05); the tungsten carbide and extra-fine diamond burs presented higher µTBS than did the coarse-diamond bur after thermal aging (p ˂ 0.05).

Conclusion: Dentin surface preparation and adhesive type had significant effects on µTBS. The smear layer created with an extra-fine diamond or tungsten carbide bur is favorable when mild and ultra-mild self-etch adhesives are used.

通用粘合剂的临床相关涂抹层和 pH 值对牙本质粘合强度和耐久性的影响
目的:评估不同涂抹层对参考两步自酸蚀粘接剂和两种通用粘接剂的微拉伸粘接强度(µTBS)的影响:暴露 90 颗牙齿的中冠牙本质,并将其分为三组(粗金刚石、细金刚石或碳化钨)。每个毛刺制备组又分为三个粘合剂组:Clearfil SE Bond(SE,可乐丽 Noritake)、Single Bond Universal(SB;3M 口腔护理)和 G-Premio Bond(GP,GC)。使用粘合剂后,制作 4 毫米厚的树脂复合材料。每个毛刺粘合剂组中有一半牙齿用于即时 µTBS 测试,其他牙齿则在热老化后进行测试(n = 5)。使用低速金刚石锯制作矩形条。每颗牙齿有 6 根中心棒用于 µTBS 测试。统计分析采用三方方差分析和 Bonferroni 检验(α = 0.05):结果:无论牙本质表面制备和热老化情况如何,SE 的 µTBS 均高于通用粘合剂,而 SB 的 µTBS 则高于 GP(p ˂ 0.05)。对于 SE 和 SB,碳化钨车针的即时 µTBS 和老化 µTBS 均高于超细金刚石车针(p ˂ 0.05)。所有类型车针的 GP 的即时 µTBS 相似(p ˃0.05);碳化钨和超细金刚石车针在热老化后的 µTBS 高于粗金刚石车针(p ˂0.05):结论:牙本质表面处理和粘合剂类型对 µTBS 有显著影响。在使用温和型和超温和型自酸蚀粘合剂时,使用超细金刚石或碳化钨车针形成的涂抹层是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: New materials and applications for adhesion are profoundly changing the way dentistry is delivered. Bonding techniques, which have long been restricted to the tooth hard tissues, enamel, and dentin, have obvious applications in operative and preventive dentistry, as well as in esthetic and pediatric dentistry, prosthodontics, and orthodontics. The current development of adhesive techniques for soft tissues and slow-releasing agents will expand applications to include periodontics and oral surgery. Scientifically sound, peer-reviewed articles explore the latest innovations in these emerging fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信