Telehealth for gynaecology outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Patient and clinician experiences.

Emma Jane Mclaughlin, Lenore Caroline Ellett, Emma Readman, Samantha Mooney
{"title":"Telehealth for gynaecology outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Patient and clinician experiences.","authors":"Emma Jane Mclaughlin,&nbsp;Lenore Caroline Ellett,&nbsp;Emma Readman,&nbsp;Samantha Mooney","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated alterations in provision of health care and how patients access it. Telehealth has replaced traditional face-to-face outpatient clinics in an unprecedented manner. This study aimed to assess overall patient and clinician satisfaction with telehealth consultations, to establish acceptability of telehealth during pandemic and non-pandemic times, and document feedback.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective observational study involving women presenting to a general gynaecology outpatient department was performed. Women who attended for consultation between 13 July and 4 September 2020 were invited to participate in a questionnaire following their telehealth appointment. Clinicians consulting in the outpatient department were invited to complete a questionnaire at the end of the eight-week study period. Satisfaction, utility and acceptability data were obtained using visual analogue scales (VAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six out of 56 (46.4%) clinicians and 124/870 (14.3%) patients completed the questionnaire. Patients who responded were older and more likely to have been born in Australia than women who did not (P = 0.0355 and P = 0.005, respectively). Overall patient satisfaction with telehealth was high (median VAS (interquartile range), 8.6 (5.6-9.8)). More women found telehealth to be acceptable during a pandemic than afterward (8.9 vs 6.6, P < 0.0001). Clinicians were less satisfied with telehealth than patients (7.1 vs 8.6, P = 0.02); however, most would be happy to continue using telehealth in non-pandemic times (7.0 (6.2-9.8)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Telehealth consultations allow provision of gynaecological care at a time when reducing risk of infection to patients and staff is paramount. Telehealth gynaecology consultations are efficient and convenient without significant detriment to patient or clinician satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":520788,"journal":{"name":"The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":"553-559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111195/pdf/AJO-62-553.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated alterations in provision of health care and how patients access it. Telehealth has replaced traditional face-to-face outpatient clinics in an unprecedented manner. This study aimed to assess overall patient and clinician satisfaction with telehealth consultations, to establish acceptability of telehealth during pandemic and non-pandemic times, and document feedback.

Materials and methods: A prospective observational study involving women presenting to a general gynaecology outpatient department was performed. Women who attended for consultation between 13 July and 4 September 2020 were invited to participate in a questionnaire following their telehealth appointment. Clinicians consulting in the outpatient department were invited to complete a questionnaire at the end of the eight-week study period. Satisfaction, utility and acceptability data were obtained using visual analogue scales (VAS).

Results: Twenty-six out of 56 (46.4%) clinicians and 124/870 (14.3%) patients completed the questionnaire. Patients who responded were older and more likely to have been born in Australia than women who did not (P = 0.0355 and P = 0.005, respectively). Overall patient satisfaction with telehealth was high (median VAS (interquartile range), 8.6 (5.6-9.8)). More women found telehealth to be acceptable during a pandemic than afterward (8.9 vs 6.6, P < 0.0001). Clinicians were less satisfied with telehealth than patients (7.1 vs 8.6, P = 0.02); however, most would be happy to continue using telehealth in non-pandemic times (7.0 (6.2-9.8)).

Conclusion: Telehealth consultations allow provision of gynaecological care at a time when reducing risk of infection to patients and staff is paramount. Telehealth gynaecology consultations are efficient and convenient without significant detriment to patient or clinician satisfaction.

COVID-19大流行期间妇科门诊患者的远程医疗:患者和临床医生的经验
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行使得卫生保健的提供和患者获得卫生保健的方式必须改变。远程医疗以前所未有的方式取代了传统的面对面门诊。本研究旨在评估患者和临床医生对远程医疗咨询的总体满意度,确定在大流行和非大流行时期远程医疗的可接受性,并记录反馈。材料和方法:进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,涉及到普通妇科门诊的妇女。在2020年7月13日至9月4日期间参加咨询的妇女被邀请在其远程保健预约后填写一份问卷。在为期八周的研究结束时,在门诊部门咨询的临床医生被邀请完成一份问卷。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)获得满意度、效用和可接受性数据。结果:56位临床医生中有26位(46.4%)完成了问卷调查,124位(14.3%)患者完成了问卷调查。有反应的患者比没有反应的患者年龄更大,出生在澳大利亚的可能性更大(P = 0.0355和P = 0.005分别)。患者对远程医疗的总体满意度较高(VAS中位数(四分位数范围)8.6(5.6-9.8))。认为在大流行期间可接受远程保健的妇女比在大流行之后接受远程保健的妇女更多(8.9比6.6,P)。结论:远程保健咨询可以在降低患者和工作人员感染风险最为重要的时候提供妇科保健。远程保健妇科会诊是高效和方便的,没有显著损害患者或临床医生的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信