Improving Diagnostic Efficiency with Frequency Double-Trees and Frequency Nets in Bayesian Reasoning.

IF 1.7
MDM policy & practice Pub Date : 2022-03-16 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683221086623
Alexandra K Kunzelmann, Karin Binder, Martin R Fischer, Martin Reincke, Leah T Braun, Ralf Schmidmaier
{"title":"Improving Diagnostic Efficiency with Frequency Double-Trees and Frequency Nets in Bayesian Reasoning.","authors":"Alexandra K Kunzelmann,&nbsp;Karin Binder,&nbsp;Martin R Fischer,&nbsp;Martin Reincke,&nbsp;Leah T Braun,&nbsp;Ralf Schmidmaier","doi":"10.1177/23814683221086623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Medical students often have problems with Bayesian reasoning situations. Representing statistical information as natural frequencies (instead of probabilities) and visualizing them (e.g., with double-trees or net diagrams) leads to higher accuracy in solving these tasks. However, double-trees and net diagrams (which already contain the correct solution of the task, so that the solution could be read of the diagrams) have not yet been studied in medical education. This study examined the influence of information format (probabilities v. frequencies) and visualization (double-tree v. net diagram) on the accuracy and speed of Bayesian judgments. <b>Methods.</b> A total of 142 medical students at different university medical schools (Munich, Kiel, Goettingen, Erlangen, Nuremberg, Berlin, Regensburg) in Germany predicted posterior probabilities in 4 different medical Bayesian reasoning tasks, resulting in a 3-factorial 2 × 2 × 4 design. The diagnostic efficiency for the different versions was represented as the median time divided by the percentage of correct inferences. <b>Results.</b> Frequency visualizations led to a significantly higher accuracy and faster judgments than did probability visualizations. Participants solved 80% of the tasks correctly in the frequency double-tree and the frequency net diagram. Visualizations with probabilities also led to relatively high performance rates: 73% in the probability double-tree and 70% in the probability net diagram. The median time for a correct inference was fastest with the frequency double tree (2:08 min) followed by the frequency net diagram and the probability double-tree (both 2:26 min) and probability net diagram (2:33 min). The type of visualization did not result in a significant difference. <b>Discussion.</b> Frequency double-trees and frequency net diagrams help answer Bayesian tasks more accurately and also more quickly than the respective probability visualizations. Surprisingly, the effect of information format (probabilities v. frequencies) on performance was higher in previous studies: medical students seem also quite capable of identifying the correct solution to the Bayesian task, among other probabilities in the probability visualizations.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Frequency double-trees and frequency nets help answer Bayesian tasks not only more accurately but also more quickly than the respective probability visualizations.In double-trees and net diagrams, the effect of the information format (probabilities v. natural frequencies) on performance is remarkably lower in this high-performing sample than that shown in previous studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520707,"journal":{"name":"MDM policy & practice","volume":" ","pages":"23814683221086623"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6e/41/10.1177_23814683221086623.PMC8935422.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM policy & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683221086623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background. Medical students often have problems with Bayesian reasoning situations. Representing statistical information as natural frequencies (instead of probabilities) and visualizing them (e.g., with double-trees or net diagrams) leads to higher accuracy in solving these tasks. However, double-trees and net diagrams (which already contain the correct solution of the task, so that the solution could be read of the diagrams) have not yet been studied in medical education. This study examined the influence of information format (probabilities v. frequencies) and visualization (double-tree v. net diagram) on the accuracy and speed of Bayesian judgments. Methods. A total of 142 medical students at different university medical schools (Munich, Kiel, Goettingen, Erlangen, Nuremberg, Berlin, Regensburg) in Germany predicted posterior probabilities in 4 different medical Bayesian reasoning tasks, resulting in a 3-factorial 2 × 2 × 4 design. The diagnostic efficiency for the different versions was represented as the median time divided by the percentage of correct inferences. Results. Frequency visualizations led to a significantly higher accuracy and faster judgments than did probability visualizations. Participants solved 80% of the tasks correctly in the frequency double-tree and the frequency net diagram. Visualizations with probabilities also led to relatively high performance rates: 73% in the probability double-tree and 70% in the probability net diagram. The median time for a correct inference was fastest with the frequency double tree (2:08 min) followed by the frequency net diagram and the probability double-tree (both 2:26 min) and probability net diagram (2:33 min). The type of visualization did not result in a significant difference. Discussion. Frequency double-trees and frequency net diagrams help answer Bayesian tasks more accurately and also more quickly than the respective probability visualizations. Surprisingly, the effect of information format (probabilities v. frequencies) on performance was higher in previous studies: medical students seem also quite capable of identifying the correct solution to the Bayesian task, among other probabilities in the probability visualizations.

Highlights: Frequency double-trees and frequency nets help answer Bayesian tasks not only more accurately but also more quickly than the respective probability visualizations.In double-trees and net diagrams, the effect of the information format (probabilities v. natural frequencies) on performance is remarkably lower in this high-performing sample than that shown in previous studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用贝叶斯推理中的频率双树和频率网提高诊断效率。
背景。医学生经常在贝叶斯推理情境中遇到问题。将统计信息表示为固有频率(而不是概率)并将其可视化(例如,使用双树或网状图)可以提高解决这些任务的准确性。然而,双树图和网图(已经包含了任务的正确解决方案,因此可以从图中读取解决方案)尚未在医学教育中进行研究。本研究考察了信息格式(概率vs频率)和可视化(双树vs网图)对贝叶斯判断的准确性和速度的影响。方法。共有142名来自德国不同大学医学院(慕尼黑、基尔、哥廷根、埃尔兰根、纽伦堡、柏林、雷根斯堡)的医学生在4个不同的医学贝叶斯推理任务中预测后验概率,形成3因子2 × 2 × 4设计。不同版本的诊断效率表示为中位数时间除以正确推断的百分比。结果。频率可视化比概率可视化能显著提高判断的准确性和速度。在频率双树和频率网图中,参与者答对了80%的任务。带有概率的可视化也带来了相对较高的性能:在概率双树中为73%,在概率网图中为70%。正确推理的中位数时间最快的是频率双树(2:08 min),其次是频率网图和概率双树(均为2:26 min)和概率网图(2:33 min)。可视化的类型没有导致显著的差异。讨论。频率双树和频率网图有助于比各自的概率可视化更准确、更快速地回答贝叶斯任务。令人惊讶的是,在之前的研究中,信息格式(概率vs频率)对表现的影响更高:医学生似乎也很有能力识别贝叶斯任务的正确解决方案,以及概率可视化中的其他概率。亮点:频率双树和频率网帮助回答贝叶斯任务不仅更准确,而且比各自的概率可视化更快。在双树和网状图中,信息格式(概率vs .固有频率)对性能的影响在这个高性能样本中明显低于先前研究中显示的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信