Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin in Chinese Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A TWILIGHT China Substudy.

Yaling Han, Bimmer E Claessen, Shao-Liang Chen, Qiu Chunguang, Yujie Zhou, Yawei Xu, Lin Hailong, Jiyan Chen, Wu Qiang, Ruiyan Zhang, Suxin Luo, Yongjun Li, Jianhua Zhu, Xianxian Zhao, Xiang Cheng, Jian'an Wang, Xi Su, Jianhong Tao, Yingxian Sun, Geng Wang, Yi Li, Liya Bian, Ridhima Goel, Samantha Sartori, Zhongjie Zhang, Dominick J Angiolillo, David J Cohen, C Michael Gibson, Adnan Kastrati, Mitchell Krucoff, Shamir R Mehta, E Magnus Ohman, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Yuqi Liu, George Dangas, Samin Sharma, Usman Baber, Roxana Mehran
{"title":"Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin in Chinese Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A TWILIGHT China Substudy.","authors":"Yaling Han,&nbsp;Bimmer E Claessen,&nbsp;Shao-Liang Chen,&nbsp;Qiu Chunguang,&nbsp;Yujie Zhou,&nbsp;Yawei Xu,&nbsp;Lin Hailong,&nbsp;Jiyan Chen,&nbsp;Wu Qiang,&nbsp;Ruiyan Zhang,&nbsp;Suxin Luo,&nbsp;Yongjun Li,&nbsp;Jianhua Zhu,&nbsp;Xianxian Zhao,&nbsp;Xiang Cheng,&nbsp;Jian'an Wang,&nbsp;Xi Su,&nbsp;Jianhong Tao,&nbsp;Yingxian Sun,&nbsp;Geng Wang,&nbsp;Yi Li,&nbsp;Liya Bian,&nbsp;Ridhima Goel,&nbsp;Samantha Sartori,&nbsp;Zhongjie Zhang,&nbsp;Dominick J Angiolillo,&nbsp;David J Cohen,&nbsp;C Michael Gibson,&nbsp;Adnan Kastrati,&nbsp;Mitchell Krucoff,&nbsp;Shamir R Mehta,&nbsp;E Magnus Ohman,&nbsp;Philippe Gabriel Steg,&nbsp;Yuqi Liu,&nbsp;George Dangas,&nbsp;Samin Sharma,&nbsp;Usman Baber,&nbsp;Roxana Mehran","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk/benefit tradeoff of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention may vary in East Asian patients as compared with their non-East Asian counterparts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized TWILIGHT trial (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention) enrolled patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. After 3 months of treatment with ticagrelor plus aspirin, event-free and adherent patients remained on ticagrelor and were randomly assigned to receive aspirin or placebo for 1 year. The primary end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding; the key secondary end point was the first occurrence of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 9006 enrolled and 7119 randomized patients in TWILIGHT, 1169 patients (13.0%) were enrolled at 27 Chinese sites in this prespecified substudy, of whom 1028 (14.4%) patients were randomized after 3 months. The incidence of the primary end point was 6.2% in the ticagrelor+aspirin group versus 3.5% in the ticagrelor+placebo group between randomization and 1 year (hazard ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.31-0.99]; <i>P</i>=0.048). The key secondary end point occurred in 3.4% of patients in the ticagrelor+aspirin group versus 2.4% in the ticagrelor+placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.33-1.46]; <i>P</i>=0.34). There was no interaction between the region of randomization (China versus the rest of the world) and randomized treatment assignment in terms of the primary or key secondary end points.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced clinically relevant bleeding without increasing ischemic events as compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin in Chinese patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov; Unique identifier: NCT02270242.</p>","PeriodicalId":516631,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e009495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The risk/benefit tradeoff of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention may vary in East Asian patients as compared with their non-East Asian counterparts.

Methods: The double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized TWILIGHT trial (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention) enrolled patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. After 3 months of treatment with ticagrelor plus aspirin, event-free and adherent patients remained on ticagrelor and were randomly assigned to receive aspirin or placebo for 1 year. The primary end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding; the key secondary end point was the first occurrence of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke.

Results: Of 9006 enrolled and 7119 randomized patients in TWILIGHT, 1169 patients (13.0%) were enrolled at 27 Chinese sites in this prespecified substudy, of whom 1028 (14.4%) patients were randomized after 3 months. The incidence of the primary end point was 6.2% in the ticagrelor+aspirin group versus 3.5% in the ticagrelor+placebo group between randomization and 1 year (hazard ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.31-0.99]; P=0.048). The key secondary end point occurred in 3.4% of patients in the ticagrelor+aspirin group versus 2.4% in the ticagrelor+placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.33-1.46]; P=0.34). There was no interaction between the region of randomization (China versus the rest of the world) and randomized treatment assignment in terms of the primary or key secondary end points.

Conclusions: Ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced clinically relevant bleeding without increasing ischemic events as compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin in Chinese patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Registration: URL: https://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02270242.

替格瑞洛加或不加阿司匹林对中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的影响:一项暮光中国亚研究
背景:东亚患者与非东亚患者相比,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双重抗血小板治疗的风险/收益权衡可能有所不同。方法:双盲、安慰剂对照、随机暮光试验(替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林或单独用于高危冠状动脉介入治疗后患者)纳入高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者。替格瑞洛加阿司匹林治疗3个月后,无事件和坚持服用替格瑞洛的患者被随机分配接受阿司匹林或安慰剂治疗1年。主要终点为出血学术研究协会2、3或5型出血;关键的次要终点是任何原因导致的首次死亡,非致死性心肌梗死或非致死性中风。结果:在暮色试验的9006名入组患者和7119名随机患者中,有1169名患者(13.0%)在27个中国站点入组,其中1028名患者(14.4%)在3个月后随机入组。随机化至1年期间,替格瑞洛+阿司匹林组的主要终点发生率为6.2%,而替格瑞洛+安慰剂组为3.5%(风险比,0.56 [95% CI, 0.31-0.99];P = 0.048)。关键的次要终点出现在替格瑞洛+阿司匹林组3.4%的患者中,而替格瑞洛+安慰剂组为2.4%(风险比,0.70 [95% CI, 0.33-1.46];P = 0.34)。在主要终点或关键次要终点方面,随机化区域(中国与世界其他地区)和随机化治疗分配之间没有相互作用。结论:在接受高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的中国患者中,与替格瑞洛加阿司匹林相比,替格瑞洛单药治疗可显著减少临床相关出血,且不增加缺血性事件。注册:网址:https://www.Clinicaltrials: gov;唯一标识符:NCT02270242。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信