Short-Term Postoperative Use of Rivaroxaban to Prevent Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Coronary Procedure: The RESTORE Randomized Trial.

Dongjie Liang, Qingcheng Lin, Qianli Zhu, Xiaodong Zhou, Ying Fang, Liangguo Wang, Guangze Xiang, Kenneth I Zheng, Weijian Huang, Peiren Shan
{"title":"Short-Term Postoperative Use of Rivaroxaban to Prevent Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Coronary Procedure: The RESTORE Randomized Trial.","authors":"Dongjie Liang,&nbsp;Qingcheng Lin,&nbsp;Qianli Zhu,&nbsp;Xiaodong Zhou,&nbsp;Ying Fang,&nbsp;Liangguo Wang,&nbsp;Guangze Xiang,&nbsp;Kenneth I Zheng,&nbsp;Weijian Huang,&nbsp;Peiren Shan","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate procedural anticoagulation is crucial for radial artery occlusion (RAO) prevention in patients undergoing transradial access coronary catheterization, although the effect of postprocedural anticoagulation lack thorough investigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of short-term postoperative anticoagulation with rivaroxaban for 24 hours and 1-month RAO prevention in patients who received transradial coronary procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 382 patients were randomized to receive either placebo (control group) or rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for a period of 7 days (rivaroxaban group) to evaluate the effect of the rivaroxaban in the prevention of 24 hours and 1-month RAO assessed by Doppler ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the incidence of 24-hour RAO (8.9% versus 11.5%; <i>P</i>=0.398) between the rivaroxaban group and control group (odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.39-1.46]; <i>P</i>=0.399). In contrast, the 1-month RAO (3.8% versus 11.5%; <i>P</i>=0.011) was significantly reduced in patients who received rivaroxaban as compared with those who did placebo (odds ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.08-0.65]; <i>P</i>=0.006). For patients with 24-hour RAO, the rivaroxaban group was associated with higher recanalization rate of the radial artery (69.2% versus 30.0%; <i>P</i>=0.027) compared with the control group. No significant differences can be observed between the 2 groups for access-site complications or bleeding events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-term postoperative anticoagulation with rivaroxaban did not reduce the rate of 24-hour RAO but improved 1-month RAO, because of higher recanalization of the radial artery. However, larger clinical trials are needed to prove our results.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR1900026974.</p>","PeriodicalId":516631,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e011555"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Adequate procedural anticoagulation is crucial for radial artery occlusion (RAO) prevention in patients undergoing transradial access coronary catheterization, although the effect of postprocedural anticoagulation lack thorough investigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of short-term postoperative anticoagulation with rivaroxaban for 24 hours and 1-month RAO prevention in patients who received transradial coronary procedures.

Methods: A total of 382 patients were randomized to receive either placebo (control group) or rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for a period of 7 days (rivaroxaban group) to evaluate the effect of the rivaroxaban in the prevention of 24 hours and 1-month RAO assessed by Doppler ultrasound.

Results: There was no significant difference in the incidence of 24-hour RAO (8.9% versus 11.5%; P=0.398) between the rivaroxaban group and control group (odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.39-1.46]; P=0.399). In contrast, the 1-month RAO (3.8% versus 11.5%; P=0.011) was significantly reduced in patients who received rivaroxaban as compared with those who did placebo (odds ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.08-0.65]; P=0.006). For patients with 24-hour RAO, the rivaroxaban group was associated with higher recanalization rate of the radial artery (69.2% versus 30.0%; P=0.027) compared with the control group. No significant differences can be observed between the 2 groups for access-site complications or bleeding events.

Conclusions: Short-term postoperative anticoagulation with rivaroxaban did not reduce the rate of 24-hour RAO but improved 1-month RAO, because of higher recanalization of the radial artery. However, larger clinical trials are needed to prove our results.

Registration: URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR1900026974.

术后短期使用利伐沙班预防经桡动脉冠状动脉手术后桡动脉闭塞:RESTORE随机试验。
背景:尽管对术后抗凝治疗的效果缺乏深入的研究,但充分的程序性抗凝治疗对于预防桡动脉闭塞(RAO)至关重要。本研究的目的是评估利伐沙班术后短期抗凝24小时和1个月预防经桡动脉冠状动脉手术患者RAO的临床价值。方法:将382例患者随机分为安慰剂组(对照组)和利伐沙班组(利伐沙班10 mg,每日1次,为期7天),通过多普勒超声评估利伐沙班对24小时和1个月RAO的预防效果。结果:两组患者24小时RAO发生率无显著差异(8.9% vs 11.5%;P=0.398)(优势比0.75 [95% CI, 0.39-1.46];P = 0.399)。相比之下,1个月的RAO (3.8% vs 11.5%;P=0.011)与安慰剂组相比显著降低(优势比0.22 [95% CI, 0.08-0.65];P = 0.006)。对于24小时RAO患者,利伐沙班组桡动脉再通率较高(69.2% vs 30.0%;P=0.027)。两组间通路部位并发症或出血事件无显著差异。结论:由于桡动脉再通率较高,术后短期利伐沙班抗凝不能降低24小时的RAO率,但可改善1个月的RAO。然而,需要更大规模的临床试验来证明我们的结果。注册:网址:https://www.chictr.org.cn;唯一标识符:ChiCTR1900026974。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信