Cardiopulmonary exercise test-based assessment of the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on the blood pressure response to exercise in patients with acute myocardial infarction during hospitalization.

Chun-Mei Zeng, Yan-Mei Zhao, Yi-Yi Li, Zhi-Hai Lin, Ping Li, Ying Feng, Jian-Ping Tan, Kai-Fang Pang
{"title":"Cardiopulmonary exercise test-based assessment of the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on the blood pressure response to exercise in patients with acute myocardial infarction during hospitalization.","authors":"Chun-Mei Zeng,&nbsp;Yan-Mei Zhao,&nbsp;Yi-Yi Li,&nbsp;Zhi-Hai Lin,&nbsp;Ping Li,&nbsp;Ying Feng,&nbsp;Jian-Ping Tan,&nbsp;Kai-Fang Pang","doi":"10.1080/10641963.2022.2055765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) on cardiopulmonary function and blood pressure response to exercise during hospitalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 265 AMI patients were treated with either perindopril or S/V within 24 hours of admission. CPET was completed for all patients before discharge. There were 182 cases in the perindopril group and 83 cases in the S/V group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) was higher in the S/V group than in the perindopril group (10.8% <i>vs</i> 1.6%, <i>X<sup>2</sup> </i>= 11.148, <i>P</i> = .001). The resting heart rate (HR), resting diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and warm-up DBP were lower in the S/V group than in the perindopril group (<i>P</i> < .05). The resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 9.0 mmHg lower (115.7 ± 17.5 vs 106.7 ± 15.0, <i>P</i> < .001), the SBP during warm-up was 9.5 mmHg lower (124.8 ± 23.7 vs 115.3 ± 22.5,<i>P</i> = .002), the SBP at the anaerobic threshold (AT) was 10.5 mmHg lower (135.3 ± 24.8 vs 127.1 ± 25.1,<i>P</i> = .021),the SBP at max watts was 11.5 mmHg lower (148.9 ± 26.4 vs 137.4 ± 26.4,<i>P</i> = .001), and the SBP during one-minute recovery was 12.3 mmHg lower (146.5 ± 27.1 vs 134.2 ± 24.4, <i>P</i> = .001)in the S/V group than in the perindopril group. The S/V group had a higher oxygen ventilation equivalent and carbon dioxide ventilation equivalent (VE/VCO<sub>2</sub>) at AT and a lower oxygen uptake-work rate relationship during max watts (<i>P</i> < .05). The differences in the oxygen pulse, stroke volume, peak oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2 peak</sub>), and VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope were not statistically significant between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with S/V was able to reduce the exercise blood pressure in patients with AMI during hospitalization, but did not significantly improve the VO<sub>2 peak</sub>, VE/VCO<sub>2</sub> slope, or exercise tolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":286988,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension (New York, N.y. : 1993)","volume":" ","pages":"397-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension (New York, N.y. : 1993)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641963.2022.2055765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) on cardiopulmonary function and blood pressure response to exercise during hospitalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET).

Methods: A total of 265 AMI patients were treated with either perindopril or S/V within 24 hours of admission. CPET was completed for all patients before discharge. There were 182 cases in the perindopril group and 83 cases in the S/V group.

Results: The proportion of exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) was higher in the S/V group than in the perindopril group (10.8% vs 1.6%, X2 = 11.148, P = .001). The resting heart rate (HR), resting diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and warm-up DBP were lower in the S/V group than in the perindopril group (P < .05). The resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 9.0 mmHg lower (115.7 ± 17.5 vs 106.7 ± 15.0, P < .001), the SBP during warm-up was 9.5 mmHg lower (124.8 ± 23.7 vs 115.3 ± 22.5,P = .002), the SBP at the anaerobic threshold (AT) was 10.5 mmHg lower (135.3 ± 24.8 vs 127.1 ± 25.1,P = .021),the SBP at max watts was 11.5 mmHg lower (148.9 ± 26.4 vs 137.4 ± 26.4,P = .001), and the SBP during one-minute recovery was 12.3 mmHg lower (146.5 ± 27.1 vs 134.2 ± 24.4, P = .001)in the S/V group than in the perindopril group. The S/V group had a higher oxygen ventilation equivalent and carbon dioxide ventilation equivalent (VE/VCO2) at AT and a lower oxygen uptake-work rate relationship during max watts (P < .05). The differences in the oxygen pulse, stroke volume, peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak), and VE/VCO2 slope were not statistically significant between the two groups.

Conclusion: Treatment with S/V was able to reduce the exercise blood pressure in patients with AMI during hospitalization, but did not significantly improve the VO2 peak, VE/VCO2 slope, or exercise tolerance.

基于心肺运动试验的评价苏比里尔/缬沙坦对急性心肌梗死患者住院期间运动后血压反应的影响
目的:通过心肺运动试验(CPET)观察苏比利/缬沙坦(S/V)对急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者住院期间心肺功能和血压对运动反应的影响。方法:265例AMI患者在入院24小时内接受培哚普利或S/V治疗。所有患者出院前均完成CPET检查。培哚普利组182例,S/V组83例。结果:S/V组患者运动振荡通气(EOV)比例高于培哚普利组(10.8% vs 1.6%, X2 = 11.148, P = .001)。静息心率(HR)、舒张压(菲律宾),休息和热身菲律宾在S / V组低于培组(P P P = .002), SBP的无氧阈值(在)低10.5毫米汞柱(135.3±24.8 vs 127.1±25.1,P = .021), SBP在马克斯·瓦茨低11.5毫米汞柱(148.9±26.4 vs 137.4±26.4,P =措施),在一分钟和SBP的复苏是12.3毫米汞柱低(146.5±27.1 vs 134.2±24.4,P =措施)的S / V组比培组。S/V组at时氧通气量和二氧化碳通气量(VE/VCO2)较高,最大功率(P 2峰值)时氧吸收功速率关系较低,两组间VE/VCO2斜率差异无统计学意义。结论:S/V治疗能够降低AMI患者住院期间的运动血压,但不能显著改善VO2峰值、VE/VCO2斜率或运动耐量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信