Intracranial-Intracranial Bypass for Aneurysms: Quantitative Intraoperative Assessment of Flow Preservation.

Matthew J Koch, Christopher J Stapleton, Fady T Charbel, Jonathan Russin, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani
{"title":"Intracranial-Intracranial Bypass for Aneurysms: Quantitative Intraoperative Assessment of Flow Preservation.","authors":"Matthew J Koch,&nbsp;Christopher J Stapleton,&nbsp;Fady T Charbel,&nbsp;Jonathan Russin,&nbsp;Sepideh Amin-Hanjani","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000000136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative flow measurement has proven utility in extracranial-intracranial bypass, particularly in assessing the adequacy of donors by measurement of cut flow. The nature of intracranial-intracranial (IC-IC) bypass precludes cut flow measurement, but quantitative intraoperative flow measurements may evaluate augment assessment of the bypass.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To retrospectively evaluate flow measurements performed in IC-IC bypass to determine the adequacy of the constructs in preserving flow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of our bypass database from 2001 to 2021 for aneurysms treated with IC-IC bypass and with intraoperative flow measurements. Patients' preoperative characteristics, bypass indications, prebypass and postbypass intraoperative flow measurements, and patient outcomes were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 346 bypasses, 21 cases using 22 IC-IC bypasses were included. The median age was 55 years; 13 of 21 cases were ruptured aneurysms. Aneurysms involved posterior inferior cerebellar artery (n = 7), middle cerebral artery (n = 6), distal anterior cerebral artery (n = 5), and anterior communicating artery (n = 3). Six bypasses were end-to-side (ETS), 10 were side-to-side (STS), and 6 were excisional with reanastomosis (end-to-end, ETE). Intraoperatively, 21 of the bypasses were patent; the postbypass/prebypass flow index averaged 1.15 (±0.32): ETE (n = 6) 1.22 ± 0.34 and ETS/STS bypasses (n = 15) 1.11 ± 0.32. All intraoperatively patent bypasses were patent on postoperative angiography. One occluded on delayed angiography without clinical sequelae.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite advances in endovascular therapy, IC-IC bypass remains essential to the treatment of large and fusiform aneurysms. We demonstrate quantitatively that IC-IC donors provide adequate direct (ETE) and redistributed (STS ETS) flow to the recipient territory. Flow measurement provides valuable information regarding the patency and adequacy of IC-IC bypass for flow preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":"337-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative flow measurement has proven utility in extracranial-intracranial bypass, particularly in assessing the adequacy of donors by measurement of cut flow. The nature of intracranial-intracranial (IC-IC) bypass precludes cut flow measurement, but quantitative intraoperative flow measurements may evaluate augment assessment of the bypass.

Objective: To retrospectively evaluate flow measurements performed in IC-IC bypass to determine the adequacy of the constructs in preserving flow.

Methods: With institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of our bypass database from 2001 to 2021 for aneurysms treated with IC-IC bypass and with intraoperative flow measurements. Patients' preoperative characteristics, bypass indications, prebypass and postbypass intraoperative flow measurements, and patient outcomes were recorded.

Results: Of 346 bypasses, 21 cases using 22 IC-IC bypasses were included. The median age was 55 years; 13 of 21 cases were ruptured aneurysms. Aneurysms involved posterior inferior cerebellar artery (n = 7), middle cerebral artery (n = 6), distal anterior cerebral artery (n = 5), and anterior communicating artery (n = 3). Six bypasses were end-to-side (ETS), 10 were side-to-side (STS), and 6 were excisional with reanastomosis (end-to-end, ETE). Intraoperatively, 21 of the bypasses were patent; the postbypass/prebypass flow index averaged 1.15 (±0.32): ETE (n = 6) 1.22 ± 0.34 and ETS/STS bypasses (n = 15) 1.11 ± 0.32. All intraoperatively patent bypasses were patent on postoperative angiography. One occluded on delayed angiography without clinical sequelae.

Conclusion: Despite advances in endovascular therapy, IC-IC bypass remains essential to the treatment of large and fusiform aneurysms. We demonstrate quantitatively that IC-IC donors provide adequate direct (ETE) and redistributed (STS ETS) flow to the recipient territory. Flow measurement provides valuable information regarding the patency and adequacy of IC-IC bypass for flow preservation.

颅内搭桥治疗动脉瘤:术中血流保存的定量评估。
背景:术中流量测量已被证明在颅外-颅内旁路手术中的实用性,特别是通过测量切断流量来评估供体的充分性。颅-颅内(IC-IC)旁路术的性质排除了切开血流测量,但术中定量血流测量可以评估旁路术的增强评估。目的:回顾性评价在IC-IC旁路中进行的流量测量,以确定结构在保持流量方面的充分性。方法:经机构审查委员会批准,我们对2001年至2021年使用IC-IC旁路和术中血流测量治疗的动脉瘤进行了回顾性审查。记录患者术前特征、搭桥指征、搭桥前和搭桥后术中血流测量以及患者预后。结果:346例旁路手术中,21例采用22例IC-IC旁路。中位年龄为55岁;21例中有13例动脉瘤破裂。动脉瘤累及小脑后下动脉(n = 7)、大脑中动脉(n = 6)、大脑远前动脉(n = 5)和前交通动脉(n = 3)。端侧旁路(ETS) 6例,侧对侧旁路(STS) 10例,切除再吻合(端对端,ETE) 6例。术中21例旁路通畅;旁路后/预旁路的平均流量指数为1.15(±0.32),et旁路(n = 6)为1.22±0.34,ETS/STS旁路(n = 15)为1.11±0.32。术中旁路通畅术后血管造影均通畅。一例延迟血管造影时闭塞,无临床后遗症。结论:尽管血管内治疗取得了进展,但IC-IC旁路术仍然是治疗大型梭状动脉瘤的必要手段。我们从数量上证明,IC-IC捐助者向受援国提供了足够的直接(ETE)和再分配(STS - ETS)资金。流量测量提供了有关IC-IC旁路的通畅性和充分性的宝贵信息,以保持流量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信