MMEF25-75 may predict significant BDR and future risk of exacerbations in asthmatic children with normal baseline FEV1.

International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology Pub Date : 2022-02-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Snezhina Lazova, Stamatios Priftis, Guergana Petrova, Emilia Naseva, Tsvetelina Velikova
{"title":"MMEF<sub>25-75</sub> may predict significant BDR and future risk of exacerbations in asthmatic children with normal baseline FEV<sub>1</sub>.","authors":"Snezhina Lazova, Stamatios Priftis, Guergana Petrova, Emilia Naseva, Tsvetelina Velikova","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Background: Several recent studies on the clinical value of spirometry indexes demonstrated high sensitivity of FEF<sub>25-75</sub> as a marker of bronchial obstruction in asthmatics with normal baseline spirometry. Our study aims to evaluate the clinical value of maximal mid-expiratory flow in children with asthma. (2) Methods: For two years, 257 children were included - 211 with asthma and 46 healthy controls. Pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry, atopic status determination and asthma control assessment were performed. (3) Results: The small airway obstruction (SAO) group (FEV<sub>1</sub>≥80%, ММEF<sub>25/75</sub><65%) demonstrated significantly lower values for FEV<sub>1</sub>, FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC, PEFR, МMMF<sub>25/75</sub> and a significant higher bronchodilator response (BDR, ΔFEV<sub>1</sub>% init. ≥12%) compared to normal baseline spirometry group (FEV<sub>1</sub>>80%, MMEF<sub>25/75</sub>≥65%) (Р<0.0001). In addition, we found a statistically significant difference in FEF<sub>25-75</sub>/FVC median between asthmatics and healthy controls (Р<0.0001) regardless of the FEV<sub>1</sub> value. Children with SAO have a 2.338-fold higher risk of poor asthma outcome (OR 95% CI [1.077-5.294]) and a 6.171-fold (OR 95% CI [2.523-15.096]) greater probability of demonstrating positive BDR, compared to children with normal baseline spirometry. MMEF<sub>25/75</sub> was found to be a good predictor for positive BDR with AUC 0.843 (CI 0.781-0.845) and a best cut-off value of 58.1% (77.8% sensitivity and 78.8% specificity). (4) Conclusion: Our results confirmed that a small but substantial group of asthmatic children with normal baseline FEV<sub>1</sub> and low MMEF<sub>25-75</sub> are at higher risk for poor asthma outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14352,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology","volume":"14 1","pages":"33-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8918602/pdf/ijppp0014-0033.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(1) Background: Several recent studies on the clinical value of spirometry indexes demonstrated high sensitivity of FEF25-75 as a marker of bronchial obstruction in asthmatics with normal baseline spirometry. Our study aims to evaluate the clinical value of maximal mid-expiratory flow in children with asthma. (2) Methods: For two years, 257 children were included - 211 with asthma and 46 healthy controls. Pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry, atopic status determination and asthma control assessment were performed. (3) Results: The small airway obstruction (SAO) group (FEV1≥80%, ММEF25/75<65%) demonstrated significantly lower values for FEV1, FEV1/FVC, PEFR, МMMF25/75 and a significant higher bronchodilator response (BDR, ΔFEV1% init. ≥12%) compared to normal baseline spirometry group (FEV1>80%, MMEF25/75≥65%) (Р<0.0001). In addition, we found a statistically significant difference in FEF25-75/FVC median between asthmatics and healthy controls (Р<0.0001) regardless of the FEV1 value. Children with SAO have a 2.338-fold higher risk of poor asthma outcome (OR 95% CI [1.077-5.294]) and a 6.171-fold (OR 95% CI [2.523-15.096]) greater probability of demonstrating positive BDR, compared to children with normal baseline spirometry. MMEF25/75 was found to be a good predictor for positive BDR with AUC 0.843 (CI 0.781-0.845) and a best cut-off value of 58.1% (77.8% sensitivity and 78.8% specificity). (4) Conclusion: Our results confirmed that a small but substantial group of asthmatic children with normal baseline FEV1 and low MMEF25-75 are at higher risk for poor asthma outcomes.

Abstract Image

对于基线 FEV1 正常的哮喘儿童,MMEF25-75 可预测显著的 BDR 和未来病情加重的风险。
(1) 背景:最近几项关于肺活量指标临床价值的研究表明,FEF25-75 作为基线肺活量正常的哮喘患者支气管阻塞的标志物具有很高的灵敏度。我们的研究旨在评估最大呼气中期流量在哮喘儿童中的临床价值。(2)方法:在两年时间里,共纳入了 257 名儿童--211 名哮喘患儿和 46 名健康对照组儿童。进行了支气管扩张剂前和支气管扩张剂后肺活量测定、特应性状态测定和哮喘控制评估。(3)结果:小气道阻塞(SAO)组(FEV1≥80%,ММEF25/751,FEV1/FVC,PEFR,МMMF25/75,支气管扩张剂反应(BDR,ΔFEV1% init.≥12%)与正常基线肺活量组(FEV1>80%,MMEF25/75≥65%)相比(哮喘患者与健康对照组之间的 Р25-75/FVC 中位数(Р1 值)。与基线肺活量正常的儿童相比,患有 SAO 的儿童出现不良哮喘结果的风险高出 2.338 倍(OR 95% CI [1.077-5.294]),出现 BDR 阳性的概率高出 6.171 倍(OR 95% CI [2.523-15.096])。研究发现,MMEF25/75 是预测 BDR 阳性的良好指标,其 AUC 为 0.843(CI 为 0.781-0.845),最佳临界值为 58.1%(敏感性为 77.8%,特异性为 78.8%)。(4)结论:我们的研究结果证实,在基线 FEV1 正常而 MMEF25-75 偏低的哮喘患儿中,有一小部分患儿的哮喘预后较差的风险较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信