"I can't understand your information sheet, doc!" Readability of limited-reach media materials for the lay population.

Waletha Wasson, Mark Scarbecz, Maurice W Lewis, Judith Ross, Van Himel
{"title":"\"I can't understand your information sheet, doc!\" Readability of limited-reach media materials for the lay population.","authors":"Waletha Wasson,&nbsp;Mark Scarbecz,&nbsp;Maurice W Lewis,&nbsp;Judith Ross,&nbsp;Van Himel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients are provided limited-reach media materials, such as information sheets and pamphlets, as reinforcement of information when the oral healthcare professional is no longer face-to-face. Patients are more likely to use the printed information if text complexity and reader's ability match, or if their need to know the content provokes an urge to read. A number of researchers have developed readability tests. This study used the Fry Readability Graph to plot the results of three independent raters' averages of the number of sentences and the words (syllables) of continuous (prose) and non-continuous (matrix-style) pre-selected passages from several reputable sources. These limited-reach materials are frequently used in academic institutions' community engagement efforts. Several of the limited-reach materials we studied were ranked above the fifth-grade reading level, so consideration must be given to future distribution of these documents in communities where the average reading proficiency is lower. Several limitations, such as the quality of illustrations and measuring the reading level of individuals, were not investigated and must be considered as the authors continue to distribute literature in certain urban and suburban locales. This study is the genesis of an academic institution's community engagement efforts to provide information to clinicians and improve its outreach distribution of limited-reach media for patients who have varying levels of general and health literacy backgrounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":76685,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Tennessee Dental Association","volume":"93 2","pages":"32-40; quiz 41-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Tennessee Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients are provided limited-reach media materials, such as information sheets and pamphlets, as reinforcement of information when the oral healthcare professional is no longer face-to-face. Patients are more likely to use the printed information if text complexity and reader's ability match, or if their need to know the content provokes an urge to read. A number of researchers have developed readability tests. This study used the Fry Readability Graph to plot the results of three independent raters' averages of the number of sentences and the words (syllables) of continuous (prose) and non-continuous (matrix-style) pre-selected passages from several reputable sources. These limited-reach materials are frequently used in academic institutions' community engagement efforts. Several of the limited-reach materials we studied were ranked above the fifth-grade reading level, so consideration must be given to future distribution of these documents in communities where the average reading proficiency is lower. Several limitations, such as the quality of illustrations and measuring the reading level of individuals, were not investigated and must be considered as the authors continue to distribute literature in certain urban and suburban locales. This study is the genesis of an academic institution's community engagement efforts to provide information to clinicians and improve its outreach distribution of limited-reach media for patients who have varying levels of general and health literacy backgrounds.

“我看不懂你的信息表,医生!”外行人可阅读的有限媒体材料的可读性。
当口腔保健专业人员不再面对面时,向患者提供有限范围的媒体材料,如信息表和小册子,以加强信息。如果文本的复杂性和读者的能力相匹配,或者如果他们对内容的需求激发了阅读的冲动,那么患者更有可能使用印刷信息。许多研究人员开发了可读性测试。这项研究使用了弗莱可读性图表来绘制三个独立的评分者对连续(散文)和非连续(矩阵式)的句子数量和单词(音节)的平均数的结果。这些句子和单词(音节)是从几个有信誉的来源中预先选择的。这些范围有限的材料经常用于学术机构的社区参与工作。我们研究的一些有限覆盖材料的阅读水平在五年级以上,因此必须考虑在平均阅读水平较低的社区中分发这些文件。一些限制,如插图的质量和测量个人的阅读水平,没有调查,必须考虑到作者继续分发文献在某些城市和郊区的地方。本研究是一个学术机构的社区参与努力的起源,该机构向临床医生提供信息,并改善其为具有不同水平的一般和健康素养背景的患者提供的有限覆盖媒体的外展分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信