{"title":"Is there evidence that social class at birth increases risk of psychosis? A systematic review.","authors":"Wingfai Kwok","doi":"10.1177/0020764014524737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the 1950s, researchers showed an association between low socio-economic status (SES) and psychosis. Two competing theories social causation and social drift were proposed to explain the findings. In the intervening years, contrasting evidence emerged as some studies showed no association between SES and schizophrenia. At present, the nature of the relationship is still unclear; currently, there are no reviews in the literature examining the association between social class at birth and psychosis.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To search the literature to clarify the relationship between social class at birth, measured by paternal occupation at birth, and the risk of adult-onset psychosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of the literature using a combination of keywords in Group 1 together with the keywords in Group 2 was performed in October 2012 in the following online databases: (a) MEDLINE (1946-2012), (b) PubMed, (c) Embase (1980-2012), (d) PsycINFO (1806-2012) and (e) Web of Science (1899-2012). Reference lists were also hand searched. The search provided 3,240 studies; following screening of the titles and abstracts by inclusion and exclusion criteria and quality assessment of the full text, 14 studies were identified to be appropriate for the review. The keywords used for the search were as follows: Group 1 - social class, social status, socioeconomic, socio-economic, SES; Group 2 - psychosis, psychoses, schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies showed an association between low SES and psychosis. Four studies showed no association, and three studies showed an association with high SES.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is not enough evidence to support the association between social class and psychosis. While some findings showed an association between low social class and psychosis, there were a number of conflicting studies showing no association or a link with higher social class. Interestingly, the results followed a temporal pattern, as all the studies conducted after 2001 supported an association between low SES at birth and psychosis. Four of the six studies employed a prospective design with large sample populations, indicating the need for further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":257862,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of social psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"801-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0020764014524737","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of social psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764014524737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40
Abstract
Background: In the 1950s, researchers showed an association between low socio-economic status (SES) and psychosis. Two competing theories social causation and social drift were proposed to explain the findings. In the intervening years, contrasting evidence emerged as some studies showed no association between SES and schizophrenia. At present, the nature of the relationship is still unclear; currently, there are no reviews in the literature examining the association between social class at birth and psychosis.
Aim: To search the literature to clarify the relationship between social class at birth, measured by paternal occupation at birth, and the risk of adult-onset psychosis.
Methods: A systematic search of the literature using a combination of keywords in Group 1 together with the keywords in Group 2 was performed in October 2012 in the following online databases: (a) MEDLINE (1946-2012), (b) PubMed, (c) Embase (1980-2012), (d) PsycINFO (1806-2012) and (e) Web of Science (1899-2012). Reference lists were also hand searched. The search provided 3,240 studies; following screening of the titles and abstracts by inclusion and exclusion criteria and quality assessment of the full text, 14 studies were identified to be appropriate for the review. The keywords used for the search were as follows: Group 1 - social class, social status, socioeconomic, socio-economic, SES; Group 2 - psychosis, psychoses, schizophrenia.
Results: Seven studies showed an association between low SES and psychosis. Four studies showed no association, and three studies showed an association with high SES.
Conclusion: There is not enough evidence to support the association between social class and psychosis. While some findings showed an association between low social class and psychosis, there were a number of conflicting studies showing no association or a link with higher social class. Interestingly, the results followed a temporal pattern, as all the studies conducted after 2001 supported an association between low SES at birth and psychosis. Four of the six studies employed a prospective design with large sample populations, indicating the need for further investigation.
背景:在20世纪50年代,研究人员发现低社会经济地位(SES)与精神病之间存在关联。两个相互竞争的理论社会因果关系和社会漂移被提出来解释这些发现。在这中间的几年里,相反的证据出现了,一些研究表明SES和精神分裂症之间没有联系。目前,这种关系的性质尚不清楚;目前,文献中没有关于出生时社会阶层与精神病之间关系的综述。目的:检索文献,阐明出生时的社会阶层(以父亲出生时的职业衡量)与成人发病精神病风险之间的关系。方法:于2012年10月在以下在线数据库(A) MEDLINE(1946-2012)、(b) PubMed、(c) Embase(1980-2012)、(d) PsycINFO(1806-2012)和(e) Web of Science(1899-2012)中,将第1组关键词与第2组关键词组合进行系统检索。参考书目也要手工检索。这项研究提供了3240项研究;通过纳入和排除标准以及全文质量评估对标题和摘要进行筛选后,确定了14项研究适合进行综述。用于搜索的关键词如下:第1组-社会阶层、社会地位、社会经济、社会经济、社会经济地位;第二组-精神病,精神病,精神分裂症。结果:7项研究显示低社会经济地位与精神病之间存在关联。四项研究显示没有关联,三项研究显示与高经济地位有关。结论:没有足够的证据支持社会阶层与精神病之间的联系。虽然一些研究结果显示低社会阶层和精神病之间存在联系,但也有一些相互矛盾的研究表明,与较高的社会阶层没有联系或有联系。有趣的是,结果遵循了一种时间模式,因为2001年之后进行的所有研究都支持出生时社会经济地位低与精神病之间的联系。六项研究中有四项采用了大样本人群的前瞻性设计,表明需要进一步调查。