Cat and dog sensitization in pet shop workers.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) Pub Date : 2013-12-01 Epub Date: 2013-10-30 DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqt116
I Yilmaz, F Oner Erkekol, D Secil, Z Misirligil, D Mungan
{"title":"Cat and dog sensitization in pet shop workers.","authors":"I Yilmaz,&nbsp;F Oner Erkekol,&nbsp;D Secil,&nbsp;Z Misirligil,&nbsp;D Mungan","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqt116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sensitivity and symptoms related to animal proteins have been investigated in various occupational groups. However, data from pet shops are limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate rates of sensitivity to cats and dogs among pet shop workers, to assess the relationship between sensitivity, allergen levels and symptoms and to investigate whether passive transport from pet shops to homes is possible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pet shop workers underwent interviews with a questionnaire adapted from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. Dust samples for allergen detection were collected from pet shops using a vacuum cleaner. Skin tests were performed with common allergens. Dust samples were also obtained from the houses of 7 workers and 12 control subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one workers from 20 pet shops were included in the study. Thirteen (25%) workers reported work-related symptoms. Four workers had sensitivity to animal allergens. The mean cat/dog allergen levels from pet shops were 15.7 and 3.2 µg/g, respectively. There was no significant relationship between cat/dog allergen levels and work-related symptoms and sensitivity to pets. None of the dust samples collected from the homes of pet shop workers contained cat allergens. Dog allergen was detected in only one house (0.58 µg/g). Neither cat nor dog allergens were found in the homes of the 12 control subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although a quarter of pet shop workers reported work-related symptoms, sensitivity to cat and dog was low. These findings suggest that work-related symptoms may be due to other factors than cat and dog sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":520727,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"563-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/occmed/kqt116","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqt116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Sensitivity and symptoms related to animal proteins have been investigated in various occupational groups. However, data from pet shops are limited.

Aims: To investigate rates of sensitivity to cats and dogs among pet shop workers, to assess the relationship between sensitivity, allergen levels and symptoms and to investigate whether passive transport from pet shops to homes is possible.

Methods: Pet shop workers underwent interviews with a questionnaire adapted from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. Dust samples for allergen detection were collected from pet shops using a vacuum cleaner. Skin tests were performed with common allergens. Dust samples were also obtained from the houses of 7 workers and 12 control subjects.

Results: Fifty-one workers from 20 pet shops were included in the study. Thirteen (25%) workers reported work-related symptoms. Four workers had sensitivity to animal allergens. The mean cat/dog allergen levels from pet shops were 15.7 and 3.2 µg/g, respectively. There was no significant relationship between cat/dog allergen levels and work-related symptoms and sensitivity to pets. None of the dust samples collected from the homes of pet shop workers contained cat allergens. Dog allergen was detected in only one house (0.58 µg/g). Neither cat nor dog allergens were found in the homes of the 12 control subjects.

Conclusions: Although a quarter of pet shop workers reported work-related symptoms, sensitivity to cat and dog was low. These findings suggest that work-related symptoms may be due to other factors than cat and dog sensitivity.

宠物店工作人员对猫和狗的过敏。
背景:在不同的职业群体中已经调查了动物蛋白的敏感性和相关症状。然而,来自宠物店的数据有限。目的:调查宠物店工作人员对猫和狗的敏感性,评估敏感性、过敏原水平和症状之间的关系,并调查是否有可能从宠物店被动转移到家中。方法:宠物店员工接受了一份改编自欧洲共同体呼吸健康调查的问卷。使用真空吸尘器从宠物店收集用于过敏原检测的粉尘样本。用常见的过敏原进行皮肤试验。还从7名工人和12名对照者的家中采集了粉尘样本。结果:来自20家宠物店的51名工作人员参与了研究。13名(25%)工人报告了与工作有关的症状。四名工人对动物过敏原敏感。宠物店的猫/狗过敏原平均水平分别为15.7和3.2µg/g。猫/狗过敏原水平与工作相关症状和对宠物的敏感性之间没有显著关系。从宠物店工作人员家中收集的粉尘样本中没有含有猫过敏原。犬类过敏原仅在1栋房屋中检测到(0.58µg/g)。12名对照受试者的家中没有发现猫和狗的过敏原。结论:尽管四分之一的宠物店员工报告了与工作有关的症状,但对猫和狗的敏感性较低。这些发现表明,与工作相关的症状可能是由猫和狗的敏感性以外的其他因素引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信