Diet alters both the structure and taxonomy of the ovine gut microbial ecosystem.

Melinda J Ellison, Gavin C Conant, Rebecca R Cockrum, Kathy J Austin, Huan Truong, Michela Becchi, William R Lamberson, Kristi M Cammack
{"title":"Diet alters both the structure and taxonomy of the ovine gut microbial ecosystem.","authors":"Melinda J Ellison,&nbsp;Gavin C Conant,&nbsp;Rebecca R Cockrum,&nbsp;Kathy J Austin,&nbsp;Huan Truong,&nbsp;Michela Becchi,&nbsp;William R Lamberson,&nbsp;Kristi M Cammack","doi":"10.1093/dnares/dst044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We surveyed the ruminal metagenomes of 16 sheep under two different diets using Illumina pair-end DNA sequencing of raw microbial DNA extracted from rumen samples. The resulting sequence data were bioinformatically mapped to known prokaryotic 16S rDNA sequences to identify the taxa present in the samples and then analysed for the presence of potentially new taxa. Strikingly, the majority of the microbial individuals found did not map to known taxa from 16S sequence databases. We used a novel statistical modelling approach to compare the taxonomic distributions between animals fed a forage-based diet and those fed concentrated grains. With this model, we found significant differences between the two groups both in the dominant taxa present in the rumen and in the overall shape of the taxa abundance curves. In general, forage-fed animals have a more diverse microbial ecosystem, whereas the concentrate-fed animals have ruminal systems more heavily dominated by a few taxa. As expected, organisms from methanogenic groups are more prevalent in forage-fed animals. Finally, all of these differences appear to be grounded in an underlying common input of new microbial individuals into the rumen environment, with common organisms from one feed group being present in the other, but at much lower abundance. </p>","PeriodicalId":11212,"journal":{"name":"DNA Research: An International Journal for Rapid Publication of Reports on Genes and Genomes","volume":" ","pages":"115-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/dnares/dst044","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DNA Research: An International Journal for Rapid Publication of Reports on Genes and Genomes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dst044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

We surveyed the ruminal metagenomes of 16 sheep under two different diets using Illumina pair-end DNA sequencing of raw microbial DNA extracted from rumen samples. The resulting sequence data were bioinformatically mapped to known prokaryotic 16S rDNA sequences to identify the taxa present in the samples and then analysed for the presence of potentially new taxa. Strikingly, the majority of the microbial individuals found did not map to known taxa from 16S sequence databases. We used a novel statistical modelling approach to compare the taxonomic distributions between animals fed a forage-based diet and those fed concentrated grains. With this model, we found significant differences between the two groups both in the dominant taxa present in the rumen and in the overall shape of the taxa abundance curves. In general, forage-fed animals have a more diverse microbial ecosystem, whereas the concentrate-fed animals have ruminal systems more heavily dominated by a few taxa. As expected, organisms from methanogenic groups are more prevalent in forage-fed animals. Finally, all of these differences appear to be grounded in an underlying common input of new microbial individuals into the rumen environment, with common organisms from one feed group being present in the other, but at much lower abundance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

饮食改变了羊肠道微生物生态系统的结构和分类。
利用Illumina对从瘤胃样品中提取的原始微生物DNA进行配对测序,研究了16只绵羊在两种不同日粮下的瘤胃宏基因组。将所得序列数据与已知的原核生物16S rDNA序列进行生物信息学映射,以鉴定样品中存在的分类群,然后分析是否存在潜在的新分类群。引人注目的是,大多数发现的微生物个体没有映射到16S序列数据库中的已知分类群。我们使用了一种新的统计建模方法来比较以饲料为基础的动物和以浓缩谷物为基础的动物的分类分布。通过该模型,我们发现两组在瘤胃中存在的优势分类群和分类群丰度曲线的整体形状上都存在显著差异。一般来说,草食动物的微生物生态系统更多样化,而精料饲养动物的瘤胃系统则由少数类群主导。不出所料,产甲烷菌群的生物在草食动物中更为普遍。最后,所有这些差异似乎都是基于新的微生物个体进入瘤胃环境的潜在共同输入,一组饲料中的常见生物存在于另一组饲料中,但丰度要低得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信