Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three newer root canal obturating materials guttaflow, resilon and thermafil: an in vitro study.

IF 0.5
Journal of international oral health : JIOH Pub Date : 2013-02-01 Epub Date: 2013-02-26
Shilpa H Bhandi, Subhash T S
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three newer root canal obturating materials guttaflow, resilon and thermafil: an in vitro study.","authors":"Shilpa H Bhandi,&nbsp;Subhash T S","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Microleakage continues to be a main reason for failure of root canal treatment where the challenge has been to achieve an adequate seal between the internal structure and the main obturating material. The objective of this study is to compare the sealing ability of 3 newer obturating materials GuttaFlow, Resilon/Epiphany system (RES) and Thermafil, using silver nitrate dye and observing under stereomicroscope.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Thirty single rooted teeth were divided into following groups. Group I : GuttaFlow ;Group II : Resilon /Epiphany sealer Group III : Thermafil with AH-Plus sealer. Teeth were decoronated and instrumented with profile rotary system and obturated with specified materials. Apical seal was determined by dye penetration method using silver nitrate. Then the specimens were transversely sectioned at each mm till 3 mm from the apex. Dye leakage was determined using stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using Kruskall-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that Group II i.e., Resilon with Epiphany sealer showed the least amount of microleakage when compared to Group I i.e., GuttaFlow and Group III i.e., Thermafil with AH-plus sealer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results of this study it can be concluded that RES had higher sealing ability followed by Thermafil and GuttaFlow in vitro but further studies have to be carried out to make a direct correlation between these results and invivo situation. How to cite this article: Bhandi S H, Subhash T S. Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Newer Root Canal Obturating Materials Guttaflow, Resilon and Thermafil: An In Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(1):54-65.</p>","PeriodicalId":520673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of international oral health : JIOH","volume":" ","pages":"54-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3768085/pdf/jioh-05-01-054.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of international oral health : JIOH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Microleakage continues to be a main reason for failure of root canal treatment where the challenge has been to achieve an adequate seal between the internal structure and the main obturating material. The objective of this study is to compare the sealing ability of 3 newer obturating materials GuttaFlow, Resilon/Epiphany system (RES) and Thermafil, using silver nitrate dye and observing under stereomicroscope.

Methodology: Thirty single rooted teeth were divided into following groups. Group I : GuttaFlow ;Group II : Resilon /Epiphany sealer Group III : Thermafil with AH-Plus sealer. Teeth were decoronated and instrumented with profile rotary system and obturated with specified materials. Apical seal was determined by dye penetration method using silver nitrate. Then the specimens were transversely sectioned at each mm till 3 mm from the apex. Dye leakage was determined using stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using Kruskall-Wallis test.

Results: The results showed that Group II i.e., Resilon with Epiphany sealer showed the least amount of microleakage when compared to Group I i.e., GuttaFlow and Group III i.e., Thermafil with AH-plus sealer.

Conclusion: Based on the results of this study it can be concluded that RES had higher sealing ability followed by Thermafil and GuttaFlow in vitro but further studies have to be carried out to make a direct correlation between these results and invivo situation. How to cite this article: Bhandi S H, Subhash T S. Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Newer Root Canal Obturating Materials Guttaflow, Resilon and Thermafil: An In Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(1):54-65.

三种新型根管封闭材料——流根管、弹性根管和热基质根管封闭性能的比较研究。
微渗漏仍然是根管治疗失败的主要原因,其中的挑战是在内部结构和主要封闭材料之间实现足够的密封。本研究采用硝酸银染料,在体视显微镜下观察了GuttaFlow、Resilon/Epiphany system (RES)和Thermafil三种新型封闭材料的密封性能。方法:30颗单根牙分为以下组。组1:GuttaFlow;组2:Resilon /Epiphany封口剂;组3:Thermafil with AH-Plus封口剂。采用牙形旋转系统对牙体进行装饰和内固定,并用指定的材料进行封闭。用硝酸银染色渗透法测定根尖封度。然后以每mm为单位横切标本,直至离顶端3mm。用体视显微镜测定染料渗漏。采用Kruskall-Wallis检验对结果进行统计分析。结果:结果显示,与I组GuttaFlow和III组Thermafil加AH-plus密封剂相比,II组Resilon加Epiphany密封剂的微渗漏量最少。结论:根据本研究结果可以得出RES在体外具有较高的封闭能力,其次是Thermafil和GuttaFlow,但这些结果与体内情况的直接相关性有待进一步研究。本文引用本文:Bhandi S H, Subhash T S.三种新型根管封闭材料guttflow, Resilon和Thermafil的封闭性能比较研究。国际口腔卫生杂志;2013;5(1): 54 - 65。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信