Clinical effectiveness of electroacupuncture in meralgia paraesthetica: a case series.

Rosemary E Alexander
{"title":"Clinical effectiveness of electroacupuncture in meralgia paraesthetica: a case series.","authors":"Rosemary E Alexander","doi":"10.1136/acupmed-2013-010395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meralgia paraesthetica is a fairly common condition resulting from entrapment of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. I have found that acupuncture produces a rapid improvement, sometimes effecting a cure, after only one or two treatments. I therefore invited referrals in order to collect a case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A series of 10 patients, which included two who had refused surgery, but excluded those with significant lumbar spine problems, were treated. Visual Analogue Scale pain scores and analgesic intake were recorded weekly, starting before treatment. Four patients were receiving high doses of analgesics and the average period of symptoms was 3-4 years. Acupuncture points used were BL25, GB30, GB34, GB31, GB32, Huatuojiaji and ah shi points of the buttock and thigh, up to a depth of 7.5 cm. Electroacupuncture was normally given from the second treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Without exception, patients were specifically tender over GB31 before they started treatment. Most were also tender over the upper lumbar spine. An average of four to five sessions of acupuncture was given. The pain scores for all 10 patients improved by at least 50%, including that of a patient with a 20-year history. At follow-up (varying from 3 to 36 months), improvement was nearly 100%. Most patients were able to stop their analgesics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Meralgia paraesthetica appears to respond rapidly to electroacupuncture. A significant trigger point at GB31 was universally present, which may aid diagnosis, although the reason for this is unclear. Further controlled studies are justified.</p>","PeriodicalId":378725,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society","volume":" ","pages":"435-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/acupmed-2013-010395","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2013-010395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Meralgia paraesthetica is a fairly common condition resulting from entrapment of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. I have found that acupuncture produces a rapid improvement, sometimes effecting a cure, after only one or two treatments. I therefore invited referrals in order to collect a case series.

Methods: A series of 10 patients, which included two who had refused surgery, but excluded those with significant lumbar spine problems, were treated. Visual Analogue Scale pain scores and analgesic intake were recorded weekly, starting before treatment. Four patients were receiving high doses of analgesics and the average period of symptoms was 3-4 years. Acupuncture points used were BL25, GB30, GB34, GB31, GB32, Huatuojiaji and ah shi points of the buttock and thigh, up to a depth of 7.5 cm. Electroacupuncture was normally given from the second treatment.

Results: Without exception, patients were specifically tender over GB31 before they started treatment. Most were also tender over the upper lumbar spine. An average of four to five sessions of acupuncture was given. The pain scores for all 10 patients improved by at least 50%, including that of a patient with a 20-year history. At follow-up (varying from 3 to 36 months), improvement was nearly 100%. Most patients were able to stop their analgesics.

Conclusions: Meralgia paraesthetica appears to respond rapidly to electroacupuncture. A significant trigger point at GB31 was universally present, which may aid diagnosis, although the reason for this is unclear. Further controlled studies are justified.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

电针治疗痛觉异常的临床疗效:一个病例系列。
背景:股外侧皮神经卡压引起的痛觉异常是一种相当常见的疾病。我发现针灸能迅速改善病情,有时只需治疗一两次就能治愈。因此,我邀请转介,以便收集一个案例系列。方法:对10例患者进行治疗,其中包括2例拒绝手术的患者,但排除了有明显腰椎问题的患者。从治疗前开始,每周记录视觉模拟量表疼痛评分和止痛药摄入量。4例患者接受大剂量镇痛药治疗,平均症状持续时间为3 ~ 4年。采用的穴位为:臀部、大腿的BL25、GB30、GB34、GB31、GB32、花拖夹脊、阿氏穴,深度可达7.5 cm。电针通常从第二次治疗开始。结果:患者在治疗前均明显压痛于GB31以上,无一例外。大多数上腰椎也有触痛。平均进行四到五次针灸治疗。所有10名患者的疼痛评分都提高了至少50%,其中包括有20年病史的患者。在随访中(从3到36个月不等),改善率接近100%。大多数病人能够停止使用止痛剂。结论:电针对神经痛反应迅速。GB31的一个重要触发点普遍存在,这可能有助于诊断,尽管其原因尚不清楚。进一步的对照研究是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信