Social contacts and depression in middle and advanced adulthood: findings from a US national survey, 2005-2008.

Lindsey E McKenzie, Ram N Polur, Cholrelia Wesley, Jessica D Allen, Robert E McKeown, Jian Zhang
{"title":"Social contacts and depression in middle and advanced adulthood: findings from a US national survey, 2005-2008.","authors":"Lindsey E McKenzie,&nbsp;Ram N Polur,&nbsp;Cholrelia Wesley,&nbsp;Jessica D Allen,&nbsp;Robert E McKeown,&nbsp;Jian Zhang","doi":"10.1177/0020764012463302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Empirical evidence has linked social contacts with mental stability. The aim is to assess how social contacts are associated with depression among the general population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed the data of 5,681 adults aged 40 or older, who completed a depression screening as a part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2008. Depression was ascertained using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), a nine-item screening instrument asking about the frequency of depression symptoms over the past two weeks. A PHQ score of 10 or higher was defined as depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of depression was 5.54% (SE = 0.64) and 8.49% (SE = 0.71), respectively, among men and women. The association between social contacts and depression were more salient among men than women. The odds ratios (ORs) of depression were 2.43 (95% CI = 1.44-4.10), 2.42 (95% CI = 1.37-4.28), 1.00 (reference) and 1.94 (95% CI = 0.80-4.71), respectively, among men who never attended church, attended occasionally, weekly and more than weekly. The corresponding ORs were 1.79 (95% CI = 1.10-2.91), 1.72 (95% CI = 1.06-2.80), 1.00(reference) and 0.98 (95% CI = 0.52-1.84) for women. Compared with the respondents who had 10 or more friends, the ORs of depression were 4.01 (95% CI = 1.89-8.50) and 1.86 (95% CI = 0.92-3.79), respectively, for men and women who had no close friends.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study concluded that traditional social contacts remain strongly associated with depression in the digital era. Digital social networking is one of the biggest growing industries, creating a new platform to make social contacts. There is an urgent need to explore how to maximize the potential of digital social networking to strengthen social bonds while minimizing its negative effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":257862,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of social psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"627-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0020764012463302","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of social psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764012463302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Aim: Empirical evidence has linked social contacts with mental stability. The aim is to assess how social contacts are associated with depression among the general population.

Methods: We analysed the data of 5,681 adults aged 40 or older, who completed a depression screening as a part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2008. Depression was ascertained using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), a nine-item screening instrument asking about the frequency of depression symptoms over the past two weeks. A PHQ score of 10 or higher was defined as depression.

Results: The prevalence of depression was 5.54% (SE = 0.64) and 8.49% (SE = 0.71), respectively, among men and women. The association between social contacts and depression were more salient among men than women. The odds ratios (ORs) of depression were 2.43 (95% CI = 1.44-4.10), 2.42 (95% CI = 1.37-4.28), 1.00 (reference) and 1.94 (95% CI = 0.80-4.71), respectively, among men who never attended church, attended occasionally, weekly and more than weekly. The corresponding ORs were 1.79 (95% CI = 1.10-2.91), 1.72 (95% CI = 1.06-2.80), 1.00(reference) and 0.98 (95% CI = 0.52-1.84) for women. Compared with the respondents who had 10 or more friends, the ORs of depression were 4.01 (95% CI = 1.89-8.50) and 1.86 (95% CI = 0.92-3.79), respectively, for men and women who had no close friends.

Conclusions: The current study concluded that traditional social contacts remain strongly associated with depression in the digital era. Digital social networking is one of the biggest growing industries, creating a new platform to make social contacts. There is an urgent need to explore how to maximize the potential of digital social networking to strengthen social bonds while minimizing its negative effects.

社会交往与成年中晚期的抑郁:2005-2008年美国全国调查的结果。
目的:经验证据表明社会交往与心理稳定性有关。其目的是评估社会交往与普通人群抑郁之间的关系。方法:我们分析了5681名40岁或以上的成年人的数据,他们完成了抑郁症筛查,这是2005-2008年国家健康与营养检查调查的一部分。抑郁症是通过病人健康问卷(PHQ)来确定的,这是一个包含9个项目的筛选工具,询问过去两周内抑郁症状的频率。PHQ得分在10分或更高被定义为抑郁症。结果:男性和女性抑郁症患病率分别为5.54% (SE = 0.64)和8.49% (SE = 0.71)。社会交往和抑郁之间的联系在男性中比女性更明显。从不做礼拜、偶尔做礼拜、每周做礼拜和超过每周做礼拜的男性患抑郁症的比值比(or)分别为2.43 (95% CI = 1.44-4.10)、2.42 (95% CI = 1.37-4.28)、1.00(参考)和1.94 (95% CI = 0.80-4.71)。女性相应的or分别为1.79 (95% CI = 1.10-2.91)、1.72 (95% CI = 1.06-2.80)、1.00(参考)和0.98 (95% CI = 0.52-1.84)。与有10个或更多朋友的受访者相比,没有亲密朋友的男性和女性抑郁的or分别为4.01 (95% CI = 1.89-8.50)和1.86 (95% CI = 0.92-3.79)。结论:目前的研究得出结论,在数字时代,传统的社会联系仍然与抑郁症密切相关。数字社交网络是增长最快的行业之一,它创造了一个新的社交平台。迫切需要探索如何最大限度地发挥数字社交网络的潜力,以加强社会联系,同时最大限度地减少其负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信