Comparison of direct medical costs between automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Laura Cortés-Sanabria, Brenda E Rodríguez-Arreola, Victor R Ortiz-Juárez, Herman Soto-Molina, Leonardo Pazarín-Villaseñor, Héctor R Martínez-Ramírez, Alfonso M Cueto-Manzano
{"title":"Comparison of direct medical costs between automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.","authors":"Laura Cortés-Sanabria,&nbsp;Brenda E Rodríguez-Arreola,&nbsp;Victor R Ortiz-Juárez,&nbsp;Herman Soto-Molina,&nbsp;Leonardo Pazarín-Villaseñor,&nbsp;Héctor R Martínez-Ramírez,&nbsp;Alfonso M Cueto-Manzano","doi":"10.3747/pdi.2011.00274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We set out to estimate the direct medical costs (DMCs) of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and to compare the DMCs for continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) and automated PD (APD). In addition, DMCs according to age, sex, and the presence of peritonitis were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our retrospective cohort analysis considered patients initiating PD, calculating 2008 costs and, for comparison, updating the results for 2010. The analysis took the perspective of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, including outpatient clinic and emergency room visits, dialysis procedures, medications, laboratory tests, hospitalizations, and surgeries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No baseline differences were observed for the 41 patients evaluated (22 on CAPD, 19 on APD). Median annual DMCs per patient on PD were US$15 072 in 2008 and US$16 452 in 2010. When analyzing percentage distribution, no differences were found in the DMCs for the modality groups. In both APD and CAPD, the main costs pertained to the dialysis procedure (CAPD 41%, APD 47%) and hospitalizations (CAPD 37%, APD 32%). Dialysis procedures cost significantly more (p = 0.001) in APD (US$7 084) than in CAPD (US$6 071), but total costs (APD US$15 389 vs CAPD US$14 798) and other resources were not different. The presence of peritonitis increased the total costs (US$16 075 vs US$14 705 for patients without peritonitis, p = 0.05), but in the generalized linear model analysis, DMCs were not predicted by age, sex, dialysis modality, or peritonitis. A similar picture was observed for costs extrapolated to 2010, with a 10% - 20% increase for each component--except for laboratory tests, which increased 52%, and dialysis procedures, which decreased 3%, from 2008.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The annual DMCs per patient on PD in this study were US$15 072 in 2008 and US$16 452 in 2010. Total DMCs for dialysis procedures were higher in APD than in CAPD, but the difference was not statistically significant. In both APD and CAPD, 90% of costs were attributable to the dialysis procedure, hospitalizations, and medications. In a multivariate analysis, no independent variable significantly predicted a higher DMC.</p>","PeriodicalId":519220,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":"679-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3747/pdi.2011.00274","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2011.00274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Objective: We set out to estimate the direct medical costs (DMCs) of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and to compare the DMCs for continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) and automated PD (APD). In addition, DMCs according to age, sex, and the presence of peritonitis were evaluated.

Methods: Our retrospective cohort analysis considered patients initiating PD, calculating 2008 costs and, for comparison, updating the results for 2010. The analysis took the perspective of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, including outpatient clinic and emergency room visits, dialysis procedures, medications, laboratory tests, hospitalizations, and surgeries.

Results: No baseline differences were observed for the 41 patients evaluated (22 on CAPD, 19 on APD). Median annual DMCs per patient on PD were US$15 072 in 2008 and US$16 452 in 2010. When analyzing percentage distribution, no differences were found in the DMCs for the modality groups. In both APD and CAPD, the main costs pertained to the dialysis procedure (CAPD 41%, APD 47%) and hospitalizations (CAPD 37%, APD 32%). Dialysis procedures cost significantly more (p = 0.001) in APD (US$7 084) than in CAPD (US$6 071), but total costs (APD US$15 389 vs CAPD US$14 798) and other resources were not different. The presence of peritonitis increased the total costs (US$16 075 vs US$14 705 for patients without peritonitis, p = 0.05), but in the generalized linear model analysis, DMCs were not predicted by age, sex, dialysis modality, or peritonitis. A similar picture was observed for costs extrapolated to 2010, with a 10% - 20% increase for each component--except for laboratory tests, which increased 52%, and dialysis procedures, which decreased 3%, from 2008.

Conclusions: The annual DMCs per patient on PD in this study were US$15 072 in 2008 and US$16 452 in 2010. Total DMCs for dialysis procedures were higher in APD than in CAPD, but the difference was not statistically significant. In both APD and CAPD, 90% of costs were attributable to the dialysis procedure, hospitalizations, and medications. In a multivariate analysis, no independent variable significantly predicted a higher DMC.

Abstract Image

自动腹膜透析与连续腹膜透析直接医疗费用的比较。
目的:评估腹膜透析(PD)的直接医疗费用(dmc),并比较连续动态腹膜透析(CAPD)和自动腹膜透析(APD)的直接医疗费用(dmc)。此外,根据年龄,性别和腹膜炎的存在评估dmc。方法:我们的回顾性队列分析考虑了开始PD的患者,计算了2008年的成本,并更新了2010年的结果进行比较。该分析采用了墨西哥社会安全研究所的视角,包括门诊和急诊室就诊、透析程序、药物、实验室测试、住院和手术。结果:41例患者(22例CAPD, 19例APD)未观察到基线差异。每名PD患者的年平均dmc在2008年为15072美元,2010年为16452美元。在分析百分比分布时,两组的dmc没有差异。在APD和CAPD中,主要费用与透析程序(CAPD 41%, APD 47%)和住院(CAPD 37%, APD 32%)有关。APD的透析费用(7084美元)明显高于CAPD(6071美元)(p = 0.001),但总费用(APD 15389美元vs CAPD 14798美元)和其他资源没有差异。腹膜炎的存在增加了总费用(无腹膜炎患者为16075美元vs 14705美元,p = 0.05),但在广义线性模型分析中,dmc不能通过年龄、性别、透析方式或腹膜炎来预测。外推到2010年的费用也出现了类似的情况,每个组成部分的费用都增加了10% - 20%——除了实验室检查,从2008年起增加了52%,透析程序减少了3%。结论:在这项研究中,每位PD患者的年度dmc在2008年为15072美元,在2010年为16452美元。透析过程中APD患者的总dmc高于CAPD患者,但差异无统计学意义。在APD和CAPD中,90%的费用可归因于透析程序、住院和药物。在多变量分析中,没有独立变量显著预测更高的DMC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信