Blood pressure measurement in peritoneal dialysis: which method is best?

Michelle M O'Shaughnessy, Martin Durcan, Sinead M Kinsella, Matthew D Griffin, Donal N Reddan, David W Lappin
{"title":"Blood pressure measurement in peritoneal dialysis: which method is best?","authors":"Michelle M O'Shaughnessy,&nbsp;Martin Durcan,&nbsp;Sinead M Kinsella,&nbsp;Matthew D Griffin,&nbsp;Donal N Reddan,&nbsp;David W Lappin","doi":"10.3747/pdi.2012.00027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal approach to monitoring blood pressure (BP) in the peritoneal dialysis (PD) population is unclear. Ambulatory BP monitoring reliably predicts prognosis, but can be inconvenient. The accuracy of home BP monitoring in this population is unproven. The automated BpTRU device (BpTRU Medical Devices, Coquitlam, BC, Canada), which provides an average of up to 6 successive in-office BP measurements, has not been studied in this patient group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 17 patients (average age: 54 ± 12 years; 12 men, 5 women; 94% on automated PD) attending a single center. All patients underwent office, home, BpTRU, and ambulatory BP measurement. The reference standard for analysis was daytime ambulatory BP. Correlation between the referent method and each comparator method was determined (Pearson correlation coefficient), and Bland-Altman scatter plots depicting the differences in the BP measurements were constructed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean office BP (126.4 ± 16.9/78.8 ± 11.6 mmHg) and BpTRU BP (123.8 ± 13.7/80.7 ± 11.1 mmHg) closely approximated mean daytime ambulatory BP (129.3 ± 14.8/78.2 ± 7.9 mmHg). Mean home BP (143.8 ± 15.0/89.9 ± 28.1 mmHg) significantly overestimated mean daytime systolic BP by 14.2 mmHg (95% confidence interval: 4.3 mmHg to 24.1 mmHg; p = 0.008). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated poorest agreement between home BP and daytime ambulatory BP. No patient had \"white-coat hypertension,\" and only 1 patient had false-resistant hypertension. Most patients showed abnormal nocturnal dipping patterns (non-dipping: n = 11; reverse-dipping: n = 5; normal dipping: n = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We report a novel finding that BP measurement using the BpTRU device is more accurate than home BP measurement in a PD population. Potential explanations for this observation include poor home BP measurement technique, use of poorly validated home BP measurement devices, or a reduced prevalence of white-coat effect among PD patients. Our study also confirms that, in the PD population, BP measurements vary considerably with patient location, time of day, and measurement technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":519220,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":"544-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3747/pdi.2012.00027","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2012.00027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: The optimal approach to monitoring blood pressure (BP) in the peritoneal dialysis (PD) population is unclear. Ambulatory BP monitoring reliably predicts prognosis, but can be inconvenient. The accuracy of home BP monitoring in this population is unproven. The automated BpTRU device (BpTRU Medical Devices, Coquitlam, BC, Canada), which provides an average of up to 6 successive in-office BP measurements, has not been studied in this patient group.

Methods: We studied 17 patients (average age: 54 ± 12 years; 12 men, 5 women; 94% on automated PD) attending a single center. All patients underwent office, home, BpTRU, and ambulatory BP measurement. The reference standard for analysis was daytime ambulatory BP. Correlation between the referent method and each comparator method was determined (Pearson correlation coefficient), and Bland-Altman scatter plots depicting the differences in the BP measurements were constructed.

Results: Mean office BP (126.4 ± 16.9/78.8 ± 11.6 mmHg) and BpTRU BP (123.8 ± 13.7/80.7 ± 11.1 mmHg) closely approximated mean daytime ambulatory BP (129.3 ± 14.8/78.2 ± 7.9 mmHg). Mean home BP (143.8 ± 15.0/89.9 ± 28.1 mmHg) significantly overestimated mean daytime systolic BP by 14.2 mmHg (95% confidence interval: 4.3 mmHg to 24.1 mmHg; p = 0.008). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated poorest agreement between home BP and daytime ambulatory BP. No patient had "white-coat hypertension," and only 1 patient had false-resistant hypertension. Most patients showed abnormal nocturnal dipping patterns (non-dipping: n = 11; reverse-dipping: n = 5; normal dipping: n = 1).

Conclusions: We report a novel finding that BP measurement using the BpTRU device is more accurate than home BP measurement in a PD population. Potential explanations for this observation include poor home BP measurement technique, use of poorly validated home BP measurement devices, or a reduced prevalence of white-coat effect among PD patients. Our study also confirms that, in the PD population, BP measurements vary considerably with patient location, time of day, and measurement technique.

腹膜透析血压测量:哪种方法最好?
背景:监测腹膜透析(PD)人群血压(BP)的最佳方法尚不清楚。动态血压监测可以可靠地预测预后,但可能不方便。在这一人群中,家庭血压监测的准确性尚未得到证实。自动化BpTRU装置(BpTRU Medical Devices, Coquitlam, BC, Canada)可提供平均多达6次连续的办公室血压测量,但尚未在该患者组中进行研究。方法:17例患者(平均年龄54±12岁;男12人,女5人;94%的人选择了自动化PD)在一个中心就诊。所有患者均接受了办公室、家庭、BP tru和动态血压测量。分析参照标准为日间动态血压。确定参考方法与各比较方法之间的相关性(Pearson相关系数),并构建Bland-Altman散点图,描绘BP测量值的差异。结果:平均办公室血压(126.4±16.9/78.8±11.6 mmHg)和BpTRU血压(123.8±13.7/80.7±11.1 mmHg)与平均日间动态血压(129.3±14.8/78.2±7.9 mmHg)接近。平均家庭血压(143.8±15.0/89.9±28.1 mmHg)显著高估平均日间收缩压14.2 mmHg(95%置信区间:4.3 mmHg至24.1 mmHg;P = 0.008)。Bland-Altman图显示,家庭血压和日间动态血压之间的一致性最差。无患者出现“白大褂高血压”,仅有1例患者出现假抵抗性高血压。大多数患者表现出异常的夜间倾斜模式(非倾斜:n = 11;反浸:n = 5;结论:我们报告了一项新的发现,在PD人群中,使用BpTRU装置测量血压比家庭测量血压更准确。对这一观察结果的潜在解释包括不良的家庭血压测量技术,使用未经验证的家庭血压测量设备,或PD患者中白大褂效应的患病率降低。我们的研究还证实,在PD人群中,血压测量值因患者位置、时间和测量技术而有很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信