Feedback Seeking in Early Adolescence: Self-Enhancement or Self-Verification?

The Journal of Early Adolescence Pub Date : 2013-02-13 Epub Date: 2012-04-12 DOI:10.1177/0272431612441070
Lisa H Rosen, Connor P Principe, Judith H Langlois
{"title":"Feedback Seeking in Early Adolescence: Self-Enhancement or Self-Verification?","authors":"Lisa H Rosen,&nbsp;Connor P Principe,&nbsp;Judith H Langlois","doi":"10.1177/0272431612441070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors examined whether early adolescents (<i>N</i> = 90) solicit self-enhancing feedback (i.e., positive feedback) or self-verifying feedback (i.e., feedback congruent with self-views, even when these views are negative). Sixth, seventh, and eighth graders first completed a self-perception measure and then selected whether to receive positive or negative feedback from an unknown peer in different domains of self. Results were consistent with self-verification theory; adolescents who perceived themselves as having both strengths and weaknesses were more likely to seek negative feedback regarding a self-perceived weakness compared to a self-perceived strength. The authors found similar support for self-verification processes when they considered the entire sample regardless of perceived strengths and weaknesses; hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) examined the predictive power of ratings of self-perceived ability, certainty, and importance on feedback seeking for all participants and provided additional evidence of self-verification strivings in adolescence.</p>","PeriodicalId":509963,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Early Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":"363-377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0272431612441070","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Early Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431612441070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The authors examined whether early adolescents (N = 90) solicit self-enhancing feedback (i.e., positive feedback) or self-verifying feedback (i.e., feedback congruent with self-views, even when these views are negative). Sixth, seventh, and eighth graders first completed a self-perception measure and then selected whether to receive positive or negative feedback from an unknown peer in different domains of self. Results were consistent with self-verification theory; adolescents who perceived themselves as having both strengths and weaknesses were more likely to seek negative feedback regarding a self-perceived weakness compared to a self-perceived strength. The authors found similar support for self-verification processes when they considered the entire sample regardless of perceived strengths and weaknesses; hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) examined the predictive power of ratings of self-perceived ability, certainty, and importance on feedback seeking for all participants and provided additional evidence of self-verification strivings in adolescence.

青少年早期的反馈寻求:自我增强还是自我验证?
作者调查了早期青少年(N = 90)是寻求自我增强的反馈(即积极的反馈)还是自我验证的反馈(即与自我观点一致的反馈,即使这些观点是消极的)。六年级、七年级和八年级的学生首先完成了一份自我认知测试,然后选择是否接受来自不同自我领域的未知同伴的积极或消极反馈。结果符合自我验证理论;认为自己既有优点又有缺点的青少年更有可能在自我认识的缺点上寻求负面反馈,而不是在自我认识的优点上。作者发现,当他们考虑整个样本而不考虑其感知到的优势和劣势时,自我验证过程也得到了类似的支持;层次线性模型(HLM)检验了所有参与者的自我感知能力、确定性和重要性评分对反馈寻求的预测能力,并提供了青少年自我验证努力的额外证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书