A statewide case management, surveillance, and outcome evaluation system for children with special health care needs.

ISRN nursing Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-03-06 DOI:10.1155/2013/793936
Karen A Monsen, Scott A Elsbernd, Linda Barnhart, Jacquie Stock, Carla E Prock, Wendy S Looman, Maria Nardella
{"title":"A statewide case management, surveillance, and outcome evaluation system for children with special health care needs.","authors":"Karen A Monsen,&nbsp;Scott A Elsbernd,&nbsp;Linda Barnhart,&nbsp;Jacquie Stock,&nbsp;Carla E Prock,&nbsp;Wendy S Looman,&nbsp;Maria Nardella","doi":"10.1155/2013/793936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives. To evaluate the feasibility of implementing a statewide children with special health care needs (CSHCN) program evaluation, case management, and surveillance system using a standardized instrument and protocol that operationalized the United States Health and Human Services CSHCN National Performance Measures. Methods. Public health nurses in local public health agencies in Washington State jointly developed and implemented the standardized system. The instrument was the Omaha System. Descriptive statistics were used for the analysis of standardized data. Results. From the sample of CSHCN visit reports (n = 127), 314 problems and 853 interventions were documented. The most common problem identified was growth and development followed by health care supervision, communication with community resources, caretaking/parenting, income, neglect, and abuse. The most common intervention category was surveillance (60%), followed by case management (24%) and teaching, guidance, and counseling (16%). On average, there were 2.7 interventions per problem and 6.7 interventions per visit. Conclusions. This study demonstrates the feasibility of an approach for statewide CSHCN program evaluation, case management, and surveillance system. Knowledge, behavior, and status ratings suggest that there are critical unmet needs in the Washington State CSHCN population for six major problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":89398,"journal":{"name":"ISRN nursing","volume":" ","pages":"793936"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/793936","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/793936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate the feasibility of implementing a statewide children with special health care needs (CSHCN) program evaluation, case management, and surveillance system using a standardized instrument and protocol that operationalized the United States Health and Human Services CSHCN National Performance Measures. Methods. Public health nurses in local public health agencies in Washington State jointly developed and implemented the standardized system. The instrument was the Omaha System. Descriptive statistics were used for the analysis of standardized data. Results. From the sample of CSHCN visit reports (n = 127), 314 problems and 853 interventions were documented. The most common problem identified was growth and development followed by health care supervision, communication with community resources, caretaking/parenting, income, neglect, and abuse. The most common intervention category was surveillance (60%), followed by case management (24%) and teaching, guidance, and counseling (16%). On average, there were 2.7 interventions per problem and 6.7 interventions per visit. Conclusions. This study demonstrates the feasibility of an approach for statewide CSHCN program evaluation, case management, and surveillance system. Knowledge, behavior, and status ratings suggest that there are critical unmet needs in the Washington State CSHCN population for six major problems.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一个针对有特殊卫生保健需要的儿童的全州范围的病例管理、监测和结果评估系统。
目标。为了评估在全州范围内实施有特殊医疗需求的儿童(CSHCN)项目的可行性,评估、病例管理和监控系统,使用标准化的工具和协议,使美国卫生与人类服务部CSHCN国家绩效衡量标准得以实施。方法。华盛顿州当地公共卫生机构的公共卫生护士共同开发并实施了标准化系统。这个工具就是奥马哈系统。采用描述性统计对标准化数据进行分析。结果。从CSHCN访问报告样本(n = 127)中,记录了314个问题和853个干预措施。确定的最常见问题是成长和发育,其次是保健监督、与社区资源的沟通、照料/养育、收入、忽视和虐待。最常见的干预类别是监测(60%),其次是病例管理(24%)和教学、指导和咨询(16%)。平均每个问题有2.7项干预,每次就诊有6.7项干预。结论。本研究证明了全州CSHCN项目评估、病例管理和监测系统方法的可行性。知识、行为和地位评级表明,华盛顿州CSHCN人群在六个主要问题上存在严重的未满足需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书