Gastrointestinal adverse effects of short-term aspirin use: a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials.

John A Baron, Stephen Senn, Michael Voelker, Angel Lanas, Irene Laurora, Wolfgang Thielemann, Andreas Brückner, Denis McCarthy
{"title":"Gastrointestinal adverse effects of short-term aspirin use: a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials.","authors":"John A Baron,&nbsp;Stephen Senn,&nbsp;Michael Voelker,&nbsp;Angel Lanas,&nbsp;Irene Laurora,&nbsp;Wolfgang Thielemann,&nbsp;Andreas Brückner,&nbsp;Denis McCarthy","doi":"10.1007/s40268-013-0011-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Aspirin is widely used for short-term treatment of pain, fever or colds, but there are only limited data regarding the safety of this use. To summarize the available data on this topic, we conducted a meta-analysis of the published clinical trial literature regarding the gastrointestinal adverse effects of short-term use of aspirin in comparison with placebo and other medications commonly used for the same purpose.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>An extensive literature search identified 119,310 articles regarding possible adverse effects of aspirin, among which 23,131 appeared to possibly include relevant data. An automated text-mining procedure was used to score the references for potential relevance for the meta-analysis. The 3,983 highest-scoring articles were reviewed individually to identify those with data that could be included in this analysis. Ultimately, 78 relevant articles were identified that contained gastrointestinal adverse event data from clinical trials of aspirin versus placebo or an active comparator. Odds ratios (ORs) computed using a Mantel-Haenszel estimator were used to summarize the comparative effects on dyspepsia, nausea/vomiting, and abdominal pain, considered separately and also aggregated as 'minor gastrointestinal events'. Gastrointestinal bleeds, ulcers, and perforations were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were obtained regarding 19,829 subjects (34 % treated with aspirin, 17 % placebo, and 49 % an active comparator). About half of the aspirin subjects took a single dose. Aspirin was associated with a higher risk of minor gastrointestinal events than placebo or active comparators: the summary ORs were 1.46 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.86) and 1.81 (95 % CI 1.61-2.04), respectively. Ulcers, perforation, and serious bleeding were not seen after use of aspirin or any of the other interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During short-term use, aspirin is associated with a higher frequency of gastrointestinal complaints than other medications commonly used for treatment of pain, colds, and fever. Serious adverse events were not observed with aspirin or any of the comparators.</p>","PeriodicalId":11373,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in R & D","volume":" ","pages":"9-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40268-013-0011-y","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in R & D","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-013-0011-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Background and objectives: Aspirin is widely used for short-term treatment of pain, fever or colds, but there are only limited data regarding the safety of this use. To summarize the available data on this topic, we conducted a meta-analysis of the published clinical trial literature regarding the gastrointestinal adverse effects of short-term use of aspirin in comparison with placebo and other medications commonly used for the same purpose.

Data sources and methods: An extensive literature search identified 119,310 articles regarding possible adverse effects of aspirin, among which 23,131 appeared to possibly include relevant data. An automated text-mining procedure was used to score the references for potential relevance for the meta-analysis. The 3,983 highest-scoring articles were reviewed individually to identify those with data that could be included in this analysis. Ultimately, 78 relevant articles were identified that contained gastrointestinal adverse event data from clinical trials of aspirin versus placebo or an active comparator. Odds ratios (ORs) computed using a Mantel-Haenszel estimator were used to summarize the comparative effects on dyspepsia, nausea/vomiting, and abdominal pain, considered separately and also aggregated as 'minor gastrointestinal events'. Gastrointestinal bleeds, ulcers, and perforations were also investigated.

Results: Data were obtained regarding 19,829 subjects (34 % treated with aspirin, 17 % placebo, and 49 % an active comparator). About half of the aspirin subjects took a single dose. Aspirin was associated with a higher risk of minor gastrointestinal events than placebo or active comparators: the summary ORs were 1.46 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.86) and 1.81 (95 % CI 1.61-2.04), respectively. Ulcers, perforation, and serious bleeding were not seen after use of aspirin or any of the other interventions.

Conclusions: During short-term use, aspirin is associated with a higher frequency of gastrointestinal complaints than other medications commonly used for treatment of pain, colds, and fever. Serious adverse events were not observed with aspirin or any of the comparators.

Abstract Image

短期服用阿司匹林的胃肠道不良反应:已发表的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
背景和目的:阿司匹林被广泛用于短期治疗疼痛、发烧或感冒,但关于其安全性的数据有限。为了总结这一主题的现有数据,我们对已发表的临床试验文献进行了荟萃分析,这些文献是关于短期使用阿司匹林与安慰剂和其他常用药物的胃肠道不良反应的比较。数据来源和方法:广泛的文献检索确定了119,310篇关于阿司匹林可能不良反应的文章,其中23,131篇似乎可能包含相关数据。使用自动文本挖掘程序对参考文献进行评分,以确定其与meta分析的潜在相关性。对3,983篇得分最高的文章进行了单独审查,以确定哪些文章的数据可以包含在本分析中。最终,我们确定了78篇相关文章,其中包含阿司匹林与安慰剂或活性比较物临床试验的胃肠道不良事件数据。使用Mantel-Haenszel估计器计算的优势比(ORs)用于总结对消化不良、恶心/呕吐和腹痛的比较效果,分别考虑并汇总为“轻微胃肠道事件”。胃肠道出血、溃疡和穿孔也被调查。结果:获得了19,829名受试者的数据(34%接受阿司匹林治疗,17%接受安慰剂治疗,49%接受活性比较剂治疗)。大约一半的受试者服用了单剂量阿司匹林。与安慰剂或活性比较物相比,阿司匹林与轻微胃肠道事件的风险更高:总or分别为1.46(95%可信区间[CI] 1.15-1.86)和1.81 (95% CI 1.61-2.04)。在使用阿司匹林或任何其他干预措施后,未见溃疡、穿孔和严重出血。结论:在短期使用期间,阿司匹林比其他常用的治疗疼痛、感冒和发烧的药物更容易引起胃肠道疾病。未观察到阿司匹林或任何比较药物的严重不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信