Patient expectations, outcomes and satisfaction: related, relevant or redundant?

Paul Licina, Michelle Johnston, Laura Ewing, Mark Pearcy
{"title":"Patient expectations, outcomes and satisfaction: related, relevant or redundant?","authors":"Paul Licina,&nbsp;Michelle Johnston,&nbsp;Laura Ewing,&nbsp;Mark Pearcy","doi":"10.1055/s-0032-1328138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong> A prospective case series of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> Is there a correlation between patients' expectations before lumbar surgery, postoperative outcomes, and satisfaction levels?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A prospective study of 145 patients undergoing primary, single-level surgery for degenerative lumbar conditions was conducted. Oswestry Disability Index, back Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and leg VAS were assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Patients' expectations were measured preoperatively by asking them to score the level of pain and disability that would be least acceptable for them to undergo surgery and be satisfied. Satisfaction was assessed 6 weeks postoperatively with a Likert scale. Differences in patient expectations between actual and expected improvements were quantified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Most patients had a clinically relevant improvement, but only about half achieved their expectations. Satisfaction did not correlate with preoperative pain or disability, or with patient expectation of improvement. Instead, satisfaction correlated with positive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Patient expectations have little bearing on final outcome and satisfaction. [Table: see text].</p>","PeriodicalId":89675,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based spine-care journal","volume":" ","pages":"13-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0032-1328138","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based spine-care journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1328138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Study design:  A prospective case series of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Objective:  Is there a correlation between patients' expectations before lumbar surgery, postoperative outcomes, and satisfaction levels?

Methods:  A prospective study of 145 patients undergoing primary, single-level surgery for degenerative lumbar conditions was conducted. Oswestry Disability Index, back Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and leg VAS were assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Patients' expectations were measured preoperatively by asking them to score the level of pain and disability that would be least acceptable for them to undergo surgery and be satisfied. Satisfaction was assessed 6 weeks postoperatively with a Likert scale. Differences in patient expectations between actual and expected improvements were quantified.

Results:  Most patients had a clinically relevant improvement, but only about half achieved their expectations. Satisfaction did not correlate with preoperative pain or disability, or with patient expectation of improvement. Instead, satisfaction correlated with positive outcomes.

Conclusions:  Patient expectations have little bearing on final outcome and satisfaction. [Table: see text].

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

患者期望、结果和满意度:相关、相关还是多余?
研究设计:前瞻性病例系列患者接受腰椎手术。目的:腰椎手术前患者期望、术后结果和满意度之间是否存在相关性?方法:对145例接受腰椎退行性疾病单节段手术的患者进行前瞻性研究。术前、术后6周和6个月分别评估Oswestry残疾指数、背部视觉模拟评分(VAS)和腿部VAS。患者的期望是在手术前通过要求他们对疼痛和残疾程度进行评分来衡量的,这是他们接受手术和最不满意的。术后6周用Likert量表评估满意度。对实际改善和预期改善之间患者期望的差异进行量化。结果:大多数患者有临床相关的改善,但只有大约一半达到了他们的预期。满意度与术前疼痛或残疾无关,也与患者期望改善无关。相反,满意度与积极的结果相关。结论:患者期望对最终结果和满意度影响不大。[表:见正文]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信