Biologic Initiation Rate in Systemic-Naïve Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Starting Treatment with Apremilast vs Methotrexate: 1-Year Retrospective Analysis of a US Claims Database.

IF 1.7 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2022-06-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OARRR.S342123
M Elaine Husni, Eunice Chang, Michael S Broder, Caleb Paydar, Katalin Bognar, Pooja Desai, Yuri Klyachkin, Ibrahim Khilfeh
{"title":"Biologic Initiation Rate in Systemic-Naïve Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Starting Treatment with Apremilast vs Methotrexate: 1-Year Retrospective Analysis of a US Claims Database.","authors":"M Elaine Husni,&nbsp;Eunice Chang,&nbsp;Michael S Broder,&nbsp;Caleb Paydar,&nbsp;Katalin Bognar,&nbsp;Pooja Desai,&nbsp;Yuri Klyachkin,&nbsp;Ibrahim Khilfeh","doi":"10.2147/OARRR.S342123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the rate of biologic initiation after commencing treatment with apremilast (APR) vs methotrexate (MTX), in systemic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Systemic-naïve patients with PsA who started treatment with either APR or MTX between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2018 were analyzed using claims data from the IBM<sup>®</sup> MarketScan<sup>®</sup> Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (2014-2019). PsA patients were identified via diagnosis codes; the first prescription date for APR or MTX was the index date. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, healthcare utilization during the year pre-index (baseline) and the year post-index (follow-up), and median time to biologic initiation were reported descriptively. The rates and risk of biologic initiation during follow-up were compared between APR and MTX users by logistic and Cox regressions, respectively. Models were adjusted for demographics, clinical and utilization measures during the baseline period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2116 patients with PsA newly treated with APR (n = 534) or MTX (n = 1582) were identified. Mean age was similar (50.5 vs 50.4; <i>P</i> = 0.938), and proportion of females was higher for APR vs MTX users (59.4% vs 54.0%; <i>P</i> = 0.031). Mean time to biologic initiation among patients who initiated during follow-up was 194.1 vs 138.7 days between APR vs MTX users (<i>P</i> < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the likelihood of biologic initiation was 58% lower (OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.32-0.54]; <i>P</i> < 0.001) with APR, with a significantly lower predicted rate of biologic initiation among APR users when compared to MTX users during follow-up (20.0% [95% CI, 16.6-23.9%] vs 37.5% [95% CI, 35.0-40.1%]). Additionally, APR users had a lower risk of biologic initiation than MTX users (HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.37-0.57]; <i>P</i> < 0.001) during the 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Systemic-naïve patients with PsA have a lower rate of, and longer time to, biologic initiation over one-year following APR initiation, compared to those initiating MTX.</p>","PeriodicalId":45545,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"123-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/bc/oarrr-14-123.PMC9207121.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S342123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the rate of biologic initiation after commencing treatment with apremilast (APR) vs methotrexate (MTX), in systemic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Patients and methods: Systemic-naïve patients with PsA who started treatment with either APR or MTX between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2018 were analyzed using claims data from the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (2014-2019). PsA patients were identified via diagnosis codes; the first prescription date for APR or MTX was the index date. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, healthcare utilization during the year pre-index (baseline) and the year post-index (follow-up), and median time to biologic initiation were reported descriptively. The rates and risk of biologic initiation during follow-up were compared between APR and MTX users by logistic and Cox regressions, respectively. Models were adjusted for demographics, clinical and utilization measures during the baseline period.

Results: A total of 2116 patients with PsA newly treated with APR (n = 534) or MTX (n = 1582) were identified. Mean age was similar (50.5 vs 50.4; P = 0.938), and proportion of females was higher for APR vs MTX users (59.4% vs 54.0%; P = 0.031). Mean time to biologic initiation among patients who initiated during follow-up was 194.1 vs 138.7 days between APR vs MTX users (P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the likelihood of biologic initiation was 58% lower (OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.32-0.54]; P < 0.001) with APR, with a significantly lower predicted rate of biologic initiation among APR users when compared to MTX users during follow-up (20.0% [95% CI, 16.6-23.9%] vs 37.5% [95% CI, 35.0-40.1%]). Additionally, APR users had a lower risk of biologic initiation than MTX users (HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.37-0.57]; P < 0.001) during the 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion: Systemic-naïve patients with PsA have a lower rate of, and longer time to, biologic initiation over one-year following APR initiation, compared to those initiating MTX.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Systemic-Naïve银屑病关节炎患者开始阿普米司特与甲氨蝶呤治疗的生物起始率:美国索赔数据库的1年回顾性分析
目的:比较systemic-naïve银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者开始阿普米司特(APR)与甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗后的生物起始率。患者和方法:Systemic-naïve 2015年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间开始接受APR或MTX治疗的PsA患者使用IBM®MarketScan®商业和Medicare补充数据库(2014-2019)的索赔数据进行分析。通过诊断代码识别PsA患者;APR或MTX的首开处方日期为指标日期。描述性地报告了患者人口统计学、临床特征、指数前一年(基线)和指数后一年(随访)的医疗保健利用情况,以及到生物启动的中位时间。通过logistic回归和Cox回归分别比较APR和MTX使用者在随访期间的生物起始率和风险。在基线期间,根据人口统计学、临床和利用措施调整模型。结果:共有2116例新接受APR (n = 534)或MTX (n = 1582)治疗的PsA。平均年龄相似(50.5 vs 50.4;P = 0.938), APR用户的女性比例高于MTX用户(59.4% vs 54.0%;P = 0.031)。在APR和MTX使用者之间,随访期间开始生物启动的患者平均时间为194.1天和138.7天(P < 0.001)。在调整混杂因素后,生物引发的可能性降低了58% (OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.32-0.54];P < 0.001),与MTX使用者相比,APR使用者在随访期间的生物起始率预测显著降低(20.0% [95% CI, 16.6-23.9%] vs 37.5% [95% CI, 35.0-40.1%])。此外,APR使用者的生物起始风险低于MTX使用者(HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.37-0.57];P < 0.001)。结论:Systemic-naïve PsA患者在APR起始治疗后的一年内,与MTX起始治疗的患者相比,其生物起始率更低,起始时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信