Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for ARFI Beams from Array Transducers.

Keith Wear, Anant Shah, Aoife M Ivory, Christian Baker
{"title":"Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for ARFI Beams from Array Transducers.","authors":"Keith Wear,&nbsp;Anant Shah,&nbsp;Aoife M Ivory,&nbsp;Christian Baker","doi":"10.1109/ius46767.2020.9251717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper reports underestimation of peak compressional pressure (<i>p</i> <sub>c</sub>), peak rarefactional pressure (<i>p</i> <sub><i>r</i></sub> ), and pulse intensity integral (<i>pii</i>) due to hydrophone spatial averaging of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) beams generated by clinical linear and phased arrays. Although a method exists for correcting for hydrophone spatial averaging for circularly-symmetric beams, there is presently no analogous method for rectangularly-symmetric beams generated by linear and phased arrays. Consequently, pressure parameters (<i>p</i> <sub>c</sub>, <i>p</i> <sub><i>r</i></sub> , and <i>pii</i>) from clinical arrays are often not corrected for spatial averaging. This can lead to errors in Mechanical Index (MI) and Thermal Index (TI), which are derived from pressure measurements and are displayed in real-time during clinical ultrasound scans. ARFI beams were generated using three clinical linear array transducers. Output pressure waveforms for all three transducers were measured using five hydrophones with geometrical sensitive element sizes (d<sub>g</sub>) ranging from 85 to 1000 μm. Spatial averaging errors were found to increase with hydrophone sensitive element size. For example, if d<sub>g</sub> = 500 μm (typical membrane hydrophone), frequency = 2.25 MHz and F/# = 1.5, then average errors are approximately -20% (p<sub>c</sub>), -10% (p<sub>r</sub>), and -25% (pii). Therefore, due to hydrophone spatial averaging, typical membrane hydrophones can exhibit significant underestimation of ARFI pressure measurements, which likely compromises exposure safety indexes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73288,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium","volume":"NA ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/ius46767.2020.9251717","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ius46767.2020.9251717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper reports underestimation of peak compressional pressure (p c), peak rarefactional pressure (p r ), and pulse intensity integral (pii) due to hydrophone spatial averaging of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) beams generated by clinical linear and phased arrays. Although a method exists for correcting for hydrophone spatial averaging for circularly-symmetric beams, there is presently no analogous method for rectangularly-symmetric beams generated by linear and phased arrays. Consequently, pressure parameters (p c, p r , and pii) from clinical arrays are often not corrected for spatial averaging. This can lead to errors in Mechanical Index (MI) and Thermal Index (TI), which are derived from pressure measurements and are displayed in real-time during clinical ultrasound scans. ARFI beams were generated using three clinical linear array transducers. Output pressure waveforms for all three transducers were measured using five hydrophones with geometrical sensitive element sizes (dg) ranging from 85 to 1000 μm. Spatial averaging errors were found to increase with hydrophone sensitive element size. For example, if dg = 500 μm (typical membrane hydrophone), frequency = 2.25 MHz and F/# = 1.5, then average errors are approximately -20% (pc), -10% (pr), and -25% (pii). Therefore, due to hydrophone spatial averaging, typical membrane hydrophones can exhibit significant underestimation of ARFI pressure measurements, which likely compromises exposure safety indexes.

阵列传感器ARFI波束的水听器空间平均伪影。
本文报道了由于水听器对临床线阵和相控阵产生的声辐射力脉冲(ARFI)波束进行空间平均而导致的峰值压缩压力(p c)、峰值反射压力(p r)和脉冲强度积分(pii)的低估。虽然存在一种校正圆对称波束的水听器空间平均的方法,但对于线性阵和相控阵产生的矩形对称波束,目前还没有类似的校正方法。因此,来自临床阵列的压力参数(p c, pr和pii)通常不进行空间平均校正。这可能导致机械指数(MI)和热指数(TI)出现误差,这两个指标是由压力测量得出的,在临床超声扫描期间实时显示。使用三个临床线性阵列换能器产生ARFI光束。使用5个几何敏感元件尺寸(dg)在85 ~ 1000 μm范围内的水听器测量了所有三个换能器的输出压力波形。空间平均误差随水听器敏感元件尺寸的增大而增大。例如,如果dg = 500 μm(典型膜式水听器),频率= 2.25 MHz, F/# = 1.5,则平均误差约为-20% (pc), -10% (pr)和-25% (pii)。因此,由于水听器的空间平均,典型的膜水听器可能会对ARFI压力测量值有明显的低估,这可能会影响暴露安全指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信