The effect of landscape structure on the distribution of brown hare Lepus europaeus in farmlands of Germany and Poland.

Acta Theriologica Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-08-18 DOI:10.1007/s13364-012-0091-z
R Kamieniarz, U Voigt, M Panek, E Strauss, H Niewęgłowski
{"title":"The effect of landscape structure on the distribution of brown hare Lepus europaeus in farmlands of Germany and Poland.","authors":"R Kamieniarz,&nbsp;U Voigt,&nbsp;M Panek,&nbsp;E Strauss,&nbsp;H Niewęgłowski","doi":"10.1007/s13364-012-0091-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Habitat management should be an important part of the brown hare (Lepus europaeus) conservation, but the habitat requirements of this species are not fully recognised. The aim of our research was to estimate these requirements by analysing the effect of various agricultural landscape structure features on the distribution of hares in five agricultural areas in Germany and Poland. The local density of hares was assessed in the spring and autumn of 2006 by using the method of spotlight-strip counts on 9-15 subareas in each research region. The structure of agricultural landscape has been described for each subarea: the share of grain, other crops and grasses as well as the density of crop edges and uncultivated places with wild vegetation. The density of hares was considerably higher in Germany than in Poland (18.8-48.4 vs. 4.1-9.5 indiv./km(2)). The hare density was positively correlated with non-grain crops in an area, with crop edges in two areas and with wild vegetation without trees in two areas, and negatively correlated with grassfields in two areas. The occurrence of wild vegetation without trees affected the hare density only in the study areas, where this habitat was relatively rare (<3 km/km(2)). It was suggested that proper projects aimed at habitat management for brown hares should be elastic, i.e. the projects should be modified depending on the structure of local landscapes. Moreover, the protection and creation of structures with wild vegetation among cropland seem to be considerable methods of brown hare or generally wildlife conservation; therefore, such measures should be an important part of agro-environmental packages.</p>","PeriodicalId":55561,"journal":{"name":"Acta Theriologica","volume":"58 1","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13364-012-0091-z","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Theriologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-012-0091-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Habitat management should be an important part of the brown hare (Lepus europaeus) conservation, but the habitat requirements of this species are not fully recognised. The aim of our research was to estimate these requirements by analysing the effect of various agricultural landscape structure features on the distribution of hares in five agricultural areas in Germany and Poland. The local density of hares was assessed in the spring and autumn of 2006 by using the method of spotlight-strip counts on 9-15 subareas in each research region. The structure of agricultural landscape has been described for each subarea: the share of grain, other crops and grasses as well as the density of crop edges and uncultivated places with wild vegetation. The density of hares was considerably higher in Germany than in Poland (18.8-48.4 vs. 4.1-9.5 indiv./km(2)). The hare density was positively correlated with non-grain crops in an area, with crop edges in two areas and with wild vegetation without trees in two areas, and negatively correlated with grassfields in two areas. The occurrence of wild vegetation without trees affected the hare density only in the study areas, where this habitat was relatively rare (<3 km/km(2)). It was suggested that proper projects aimed at habitat management for brown hares should be elastic, i.e. the projects should be modified depending on the structure of local landscapes. Moreover, the protection and creation of structures with wild vegetation among cropland seem to be considerable methods of brown hare or generally wildlife conservation; therefore, such measures should be an important part of agro-environmental packages.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

景观结构对德国和波兰农田褐兔分布的影响。
生境管理应成为褐兔保护的重要组成部分,但褐兔对生境的要求尚未得到充分认识。我们研究的目的是通过分析德国和波兰五个农业区中各种农业景观结构特征对野兔分布的影响来估计这些需求。2006年春、秋两季,采用射灯条计数法,在每个调查区9 ~ 15个分区内对当地野兔密度进行调查。对每个分区的农业景观结构进行了描述:粮食、其他作物和草的比例,以及作物边缘和野生植被未开垦地区的密度。德国野兔密度(18.8 ~ 48.4只/km)明显高于波兰(4.1 ~ 9.5只/km)。野兔密度与1个地区的非粮食作物呈正相关,与2个地区的作物边缘呈正相关,与2个地区的无树野生植被呈负相关。无树木的野生植被只在生境相对稀少的研究区内对野兔密度有影响(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Theriologica
Acta Theriologica 生物-动物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信