Response to Grisedale and Van Daal: comparison of STR profiling from low template DNA extracts with and without the consensus profiling method.

Bas Kokshoorn, Bart J Blankers
{"title":"Response to Grisedale and Van Daal: comparison of STR profiling from low template DNA extracts with and without the consensus profiling method.","authors":"Bas Kokshoorn,&nbsp;Bart J Blankers","doi":"10.1186/2041-2223-4-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p> In a recent contribution to this journal Grisedale and Van Daal concluded that a single STR analysis of all available template DNA is to be preferred over replicate analyses and a consensus approach when analyzing low template DNA samples. A single STR analysis approach does not allow for an assessment of the validity of the resulting DNA profile. We argue that the use of replicate amplifications is the best way to objectively quantify the extent of the stochastic variation in the data. By applying consensus methodology and/or a probabilistic model, the interpretation of the data will therefore be more objective and reliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":89160,"journal":{"name":"Investigative genetics","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2041-2223-4-1","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-4-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

In a recent contribution to this journal Grisedale and Van Daal concluded that a single STR analysis of all available template DNA is to be preferred over replicate analyses and a consensus approach when analyzing low template DNA samples. A single STR analysis approach does not allow for an assessment of the validity of the resulting DNA profile. We argue that the use of replicate amplifications is the best way to objectively quantify the extent of the stochastic variation in the data. By applying consensus methodology and/or a probabilistic model, the interpretation of the data will therefore be more objective and reliable.

对Grisedale和Van Daal的反应:使用和不使用共识分析方法的低模板DNA提取物STR分析的比较。
Grisedale和Van Daal在最近发表于本杂志的一篇文章中得出结论,在分析低模板DNA样本时,对所有可用的模板DNA进行单一STR分析比重复分析和共识方法更可取。单一的STR分析方法不允许评估所得DNA谱的有效性。我们认为,使用重复放大是客观量化数据随机变化程度的最佳方法。因此,通过采用共识方法和/或概率模型,对数据的解释将更加客观和可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书