Comment on Kokshoorn, B, and Blankers, BJ 'Response to Grisedale, KS and van Daal, A: comparison of STR profiling from low template DNA extracts with and without the consensus profiling method'.

Kelly Grisedale, Angela van Daal
{"title":"Comment on Kokshoorn, B, and Blankers, BJ 'Response to Grisedale, KS and van Daal, A: comparison of STR profiling from low template DNA extracts with and without the consensus profiling method'.","authors":"Kelly Grisedale,&nbsp;Angela van Daal","doi":"10.1186/2041-2223-4-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p> Kokshoorn and Blankers responded to our recent article by saying that replicate analysis and consensus profiling of low template samples was best in terms of reliability and objectivity. We agree that the consensus approach has benefits, particularly in eliminating non-repeating spurious alleles from the final profile. However, with the development of statistical models that can accommodate stochastic effects and allele drop in, it may be beneficial to perform a single amplification with three times the amount of template, since much information is lost from the profile using the consensus approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":89160,"journal":{"name":"Investigative genetics","volume":" ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2041-2223-4-2","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-4-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Kokshoorn and Blankers responded to our recent article by saying that replicate analysis and consensus profiling of low template samples was best in terms of reliability and objectivity. We agree that the consensus approach has benefits, particularly in eliminating non-repeating spurious alleles from the final profile. However, with the development of statistical models that can accommodate stochastic effects and allele drop in, it may be beneficial to perform a single amplification with three times the amount of template, since much information is lost from the profile using the consensus approach.

对Kokshoorn, B和Blankers, BJ“对Grisedale, KS和van Daal, A的回应:使用和不使用共识分析方法的低模板DNA提取STR分析的比较”的评论。
Kokshoorn和Blankers回应了我们最近的一篇文章,他们说低模板样本的重复分析和共识分析在可靠性和客观性方面是最好的。我们同意,共识方法有好处,特别是在消除非重复假等位基因从最终档案。然而,随着能够适应随机效应和等位基因下降的统计模型的发展,使用三倍数量的模板进行单次扩增可能是有益的,因为使用共识方法会丢失很多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书