Considering trauma exposure in the context of genetics studies of posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review.

Julia Digangi, Guia Guffanti, Katie A McLaughlin, Karestan C Koenen
{"title":"Considering trauma exposure in the context of genetics studies of posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review.","authors":"Julia Digangi, Guia Guffanti, Katie A McLaughlin, Karestan C Koenen","doi":"10.1186/2045-5380-3-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating anxiety disorder. Surveys of the general population suggest that while 50-85% of Americans will experience a traumatic event in their lifetime, only 2-50% will develop PTSD. Why some individuals develop PTSD following trauma exposure while others remain resilient is a central question in the field of trauma research. For more than half a century, the role of genetic influences on PTSD has been considered as a potential vulnerability factor. However, despite the exponential growth of molecular genetic studies over the past decade, limited progress has been made in identifying true genetic variants for PTSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an attempt to aid future genome wide association studies (GWAS), this paper presents a systematic review of 28 genetic association studies of PTSD. Inclusion criteria required that 1) all participants were exposed to Criterion A traumatic events, 2) polymorphisms of relevant genes were genotyped and assessed in relation to participants' PTSD status, 3) quantitative methods were used, and 4) articles were published in English and in peer-reviewed journals. In the examination of these 28 studies, particular attention was given to variables related to trauma exposure (e.g. number of traumas, type of trauma).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that most articles did not report on the GxE interaction in the context of PTSD or present data on the main effects of E despite having data available. Furthermore, some studies that did consider the GxE interaction had significant findings, underscoring the importance of examining how genotypes can modify the effect of trauma on PTSD. Additionally, results indicated that only a small number of genes continue to be studied and that there were marked differences in methodologies across studies, which subsequently limited robust conclusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As trauma exposure is a necessary condition for the PTSD diagnosis, this paper identifies gaps in the current literature as well as provides recommendations for how future GWAS studies can most effectively incorporate trauma exposure data in both the design and analysis phases of studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":89532,"journal":{"name":"Biology of mood & anxiety disorders","volume":" ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of mood & anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-5380-3-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating anxiety disorder. Surveys of the general population suggest that while 50-85% of Americans will experience a traumatic event in their lifetime, only 2-50% will develop PTSD. Why some individuals develop PTSD following trauma exposure while others remain resilient is a central question in the field of trauma research. For more than half a century, the role of genetic influences on PTSD has been considered as a potential vulnerability factor. However, despite the exponential growth of molecular genetic studies over the past decade, limited progress has been made in identifying true genetic variants for PTSD.

Methods: In an attempt to aid future genome wide association studies (GWAS), this paper presents a systematic review of 28 genetic association studies of PTSD. Inclusion criteria required that 1) all participants were exposed to Criterion A traumatic events, 2) polymorphisms of relevant genes were genotyped and assessed in relation to participants' PTSD status, 3) quantitative methods were used, and 4) articles were published in English and in peer-reviewed journals. In the examination of these 28 studies, particular attention was given to variables related to trauma exposure (e.g. number of traumas, type of trauma).

Results: Results indicated that most articles did not report on the GxE interaction in the context of PTSD or present data on the main effects of E despite having data available. Furthermore, some studies that did consider the GxE interaction had significant findings, underscoring the importance of examining how genotypes can modify the effect of trauma on PTSD. Additionally, results indicated that only a small number of genes continue to be studied and that there were marked differences in methodologies across studies, which subsequently limited robust conclusions.

Conclusions: As trauma exposure is a necessary condition for the PTSD diagnosis, this paper identifies gaps in the current literature as well as provides recommendations for how future GWAS studies can most effectively incorporate trauma exposure data in both the design and analysis phases of studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在创伤后应激障碍遗传学研究中考虑创伤暴露:系统综述。
背景:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)是一种使人衰弱的焦虑症。对普通人群的调查显示,虽然 50-85% 的美国人一生中会经历创伤事件,但只有 2-50% 的人会患上创伤后应激障碍。为什么有些人在遭受创伤后会患上创伤后应激障碍,而有些人却能保持复原力,这是创伤研究领域的一个核心问题。半个多世纪以来,遗传对创伤后应激障碍的影响一直被认为是一个潜在的易感因素。然而,尽管分子遗传学研究在过去十年中呈指数级增长,但在确定创伤后应激障碍的真正遗传变异方面却进展有限:为了帮助未来的全基因组关联研究(GWAS),本文对 28 项创伤后应激障碍的遗传关联研究进行了系统回顾。纳入标准要求:1)所有参与者都暴露于标准 A 创伤事件;2)对相关基因的多态性进行基因分型,并评估其与参与者创伤后应激障碍状况的关系;3)使用定量方法;4)文章以英文发表在同行评审期刊上。在研究这 28 项研究时,特别关注了与创伤暴露有关的变量(如创伤次数、创伤类型):结果表明,大多数文章都没有报告创伤后应激障碍背景下 GxE 的交互作用,也没有提供有关 E 的主要影响的数据,尽管这些数据是可用的。此外,一些考虑了 GxE 相互作用的研究得出了有意义的结果,强调了研究基因型如何改变创伤后应激障碍影响的重要性。此外,研究结果表明,只有少数基因仍在被研究,而且不同研究的方法存在明显差异,这限制了得出可靠的结论:由于创伤暴露是创伤后应激障碍诊断的必要条件,本文指出了目前文献中存在的不足,并就未来的 GWAS 研究如何最有效地将创伤暴露数据纳入研究的设计和分析阶段提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书