Osteopathic treatment of patients with long-term sequelae of whiplash injury: effect on neck pain disability and quality of life.

Florian Schwerla, Albrecht K Kaiser, Richard Gietz, Ralf Kastner
{"title":"Osteopathic treatment of patients with long-term sequelae of whiplash injury: effect on neck pain disability and quality of life.","authors":"Florian Schwerla,&nbsp;Albrecht K Kaiser,&nbsp;Richard Gietz,&nbsp;Ralf Kastner","doi":"10.1089/acm.2012.0354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The clinical sequelae and manifestation resulting from whiplash injury are defined as late whiplash syndrome (LWS). The objective of this study was to investigate whether a series of osteopathic treatments of patients with LWS may improve their symptoms.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study was designed as a two-phase (pre-post) clinical intervention study. In phase one, the patients received no treatment for 6 weeks; in phase two, they received five test-dependent osteopathic treatments.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Forty-two (42) patients (mean age 39 years) suffering from LWS due to car rear-end collisions were included.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Five (5) individualized and custom-tailored osteopathic treatments at 1-week intervals were performed.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Main outcome parameters were the neck-related pain and disability (determined by the Neck Pain and Disability Scale [NPAD]) and the quality of life (assessed on the SF-36). The presence of a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was diagnosed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A direct comparison between the untreated period and the treatment period revealed clinically relevant and statistically significant improvements in the osteopathic treatment period for the NPAD. In the intervention phase, the NPAD dropped from 41.5 to 26.0 points, which corresponds to an improvement of 37% (95% confidence interval=11.1-19.8; p<0.0005). For the SF-36, both the physical and the mental component summary showed a significant and substantial improvement during treatment phase (p=0.009 versus p=0.02). Prior to treatment, 17 patients (43.6%) were diagnosed with a positive PTSD; this number fell to only 6 (15.4%) during observation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Five (5) osteopathic treatments had a beneficial effect on the physical as well as the mental aspects of LWS and lives up to its claim of being a complementary modality in the treatment regimen of this condition. Based on these preliminary findings, rigorous randomized controlled studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":520659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)","volume":" ","pages":"543-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/acm.2012.0354","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2012.0354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Objectives: The clinical sequelae and manifestation resulting from whiplash injury are defined as late whiplash syndrome (LWS). The objective of this study was to investigate whether a series of osteopathic treatments of patients with LWS may improve their symptoms.

Design: The study was designed as a two-phase (pre-post) clinical intervention study. In phase one, the patients received no treatment for 6 weeks; in phase two, they received five test-dependent osteopathic treatments.

Setting: Forty-two (42) patients (mean age 39 years) suffering from LWS due to car rear-end collisions were included.

Intervention: Five (5) individualized and custom-tailored osteopathic treatments at 1-week intervals were performed.

Main outcome measures: Main outcome parameters were the neck-related pain and disability (determined by the Neck Pain and Disability Scale [NPAD]) and the quality of life (assessed on the SF-36). The presence of a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was diagnosed.

Results: A direct comparison between the untreated period and the treatment period revealed clinically relevant and statistically significant improvements in the osteopathic treatment period for the NPAD. In the intervention phase, the NPAD dropped from 41.5 to 26.0 points, which corresponds to an improvement of 37% (95% confidence interval=11.1-19.8; p<0.0005). For the SF-36, both the physical and the mental component summary showed a significant and substantial improvement during treatment phase (p=0.009 versus p=0.02). Prior to treatment, 17 patients (43.6%) were diagnosed with a positive PTSD; this number fell to only 6 (15.4%) during observation.

Conclusions: Five (5) osteopathic treatments had a beneficial effect on the physical as well as the mental aspects of LWS and lives up to its claim of being a complementary modality in the treatment regimen of this condition. Based on these preliminary findings, rigorous randomized controlled studies are warranted.

颈椎扭伤长期后遗症患者的骨科治疗:对颈部疼痛、残疾和生活质量的影响。
目的:将颈部损伤的临床表现和后遗症定义为晚期颈部损伤综合征(LWS)。本研究的目的是探讨对LWS患者的一系列整骨疗法是否可以改善他们的症状。设计:本研究设计为两阶段(前后)临床干预研究。在第一阶段,患者没有接受治疗6周;在第二阶段,他们接受了五种依赖测试的整骨疗法。研究对象:包括42例因汽车追尾碰撞导致LWS的患者(平均年龄39岁)。干预:每隔1周进行5次个性化和定制的整骨疗法。主要结局指标:主要结局参数为颈部相关疼痛和残疾(由颈部疼痛和残疾量表[NPAD]确定)和生活质量(用SF-36评估)。诊断为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。结果:未治疗期和治疗期的直接比较显示,NPAD的整骨疗法治疗期有临床相关和统计学上的显著改善。在干预阶段,NPAD从41.5点下降到26.0点,相当于改善了37%(95%置信区间=11.1-19.8;结论:五(5)种整骨疗法对LWS的身体和精神方面都有有益的影响,并符合其作为这种疾病治疗方案的补充方式的说法。基于这些初步发现,严格的随机对照研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信