Current and future options for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion.

Expert opinion on medical diagnostics Pub Date : 2013-05-01 Epub Date: 2013-04-04 DOI:10.1517/17530059.2013.786038
Francisco Rodriguez-Panadero, Beatriz Romero-Romero
{"title":"Current and future options for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion.","authors":"Francisco Rodriguez-Panadero,&nbsp;Beatriz Romero-Romero","doi":"10.1517/17530059.2013.786038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a frequent problem faced by clinicians, but tumor pleural involvement can be seen without effusion.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Imaging, pleural fluid analysis, biomarkers for MPE, needle pleural biopsy and thoracoscopy. To prepare this review, we performed a search using keywords: 'diagnosis' + 'malignant' + 'pleural' + 'effusion' (all fields) in PubMed, and found 4106 articles overall (until 16 January 2013, 881 in the last 5 years).</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Ultrasound techniques will stay as valuable tools for pleural effusions. Biomarkers in pleural fluid do not currently provide an acceptable yield for MPE. In subjects with past history of asbestos exposure, some serum or plasma markers (soluble mesothelin, fibulin) might help in selecting cases for close follow-up, to detect mesothelioma early. Needle pleural biopsy is justified only if used with image-techniques (ultrasound or CT) guidance, and thoracoscopy is better for both diagnosis and immediate palliative treatment (pleurodesis). Animal models of MPE and 'spheroids' are promising for research involving both pathophysiology and therapy. Considering the possibility of direct pleural delivery of nanotechnology-developed compounds-fit to both diagnosis and therapy purposes ('theranostics')-MPE and mesothelioma in particular are likely to benefit sooner than later from this exciting perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":72996,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"275-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1517/17530059.2013.786038","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1517/17530059.2013.786038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Introduction: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a frequent problem faced by clinicians, but tumor pleural involvement can be seen without effusion.

Areas covered: Imaging, pleural fluid analysis, biomarkers for MPE, needle pleural biopsy and thoracoscopy. To prepare this review, we performed a search using keywords: 'diagnosis' + 'malignant' + 'pleural' + 'effusion' (all fields) in PubMed, and found 4106 articles overall (until 16 January 2013, 881 in the last 5 years).

Expert opinion: Ultrasound techniques will stay as valuable tools for pleural effusions. Biomarkers in pleural fluid do not currently provide an acceptable yield for MPE. In subjects with past history of asbestos exposure, some serum or plasma markers (soluble mesothelin, fibulin) might help in selecting cases for close follow-up, to detect mesothelioma early. Needle pleural biopsy is justified only if used with image-techniques (ultrasound or CT) guidance, and thoracoscopy is better for both diagnosis and immediate palliative treatment (pleurodesis). Animal models of MPE and 'spheroids' are promising for research involving both pathophysiology and therapy. Considering the possibility of direct pleural delivery of nanotechnology-developed compounds-fit to both diagnosis and therapy purposes ('theranostics')-MPE and mesothelioma in particular are likely to benefit sooner than later from this exciting perspective.

恶性胸腔积液诊断的当前和未来选择。
恶性胸膜积液(MPE)是临床医生经常面临的问题,但肿瘤胸膜累及可以看到没有积液。涉及领域:影像、胸膜穿刺活检、胸腔镜检查、胸膜穿刺活检、胸腔积液分析、MPE生物标志物。为了准备本综述,我们在PubMed中使用关键词:“诊断”+“恶性”+“胸膜”+“积液”(所有领域)进行了搜索,共发现4106篇文章(截至2013年1月16日,过去5年881篇)。专家意见:超声技术仍将是诊断胸腔积液的重要工具。目前,胸膜液中的生物标志物不能提供可接受的MPE产率。对于既往有石棉暴露史的受试者,一些血清或血浆标志物(可溶性间皮素、纤维蛋白)可能有助于选择病例进行密切随访,以便早期发现间皮瘤。胸膜穿刺活检只有在影像技术(超声或CT)指导下才有意义,胸腔镜在诊断和立即姑息治疗(胸膜穿刺术)方面都更好。MPE和“球状体”的动物模型在病理生理学和治疗研究中都很有前景。考虑到直接胸膜输送纳米技术开发的化合物的可能性-适合诊断和治疗目的(“治疗学”)-MPE和间皮瘤尤其可能从这一令人兴奋的前景中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信