A comparison between a SNOMED CT problem list and the ICD-10-CM/PCS HIPAA code sets.

Q3 Medicine
Steven J Steindel
{"title":"A comparison between a SNOMED CT problem list and the ICD-10-CM/PCS HIPAA code sets.","authors":"Steven J Steindel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2013 the United States will convert from the use of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) to the use of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification/Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-CM/PCS). This study compares the approximately 5,000 terms in the July 2009 Clinical Observations Recording and Encoding (CORE) Problem List subset of the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) terminology produced by the National Library of Medicine with terms found in the January 2009 versions of ICD-10-CM/PCS. The comparison was done by a single individual and used the internally defined concepts of \"Exact,\" \"Inexact,\" \"Model\" (one SNOMED CT term to many ICD-10-CM/PCS terms), \"Not Elsewhere Classified,\" \"Not Otherwise Specified,\" \"Synonym,\" and \"Not Found\" to classify the CORE Problem List terms according to the quality of the match. Among the CORE Problem List terms, 6.0 percent were not found in ICD-10-CM/PCS, and 69.1 percent had equivalent ICD-10-CM/PCS terms. The 13.0 percent of terms classified as \"Inexact\" could also be used directly assuming some acceptable loss of clinical precision. The 11.9 percent of terms classified as \"Model\" represent differences that require rule-based mapping. The results of this study suggest that ICD-10-CM/PCS meets the intended design goal of increased clinical precision but studies are needed to precisely define the depth of coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":40052,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association","volume":" ","pages":"1b"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3329199/pdf/phim0009-0001b.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2013 the United States will convert from the use of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) to the use of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification/Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-CM/PCS). This study compares the approximately 5,000 terms in the July 2009 Clinical Observations Recording and Encoding (CORE) Problem List subset of the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) terminology produced by the National Library of Medicine with terms found in the January 2009 versions of ICD-10-CM/PCS. The comparison was done by a single individual and used the internally defined concepts of "Exact," "Inexact," "Model" (one SNOMED CT term to many ICD-10-CM/PCS terms), "Not Elsewhere Classified," "Not Otherwise Specified," "Synonym," and "Not Found" to classify the CORE Problem List terms according to the quality of the match. Among the CORE Problem List terms, 6.0 percent were not found in ICD-10-CM/PCS, and 69.1 percent had equivalent ICD-10-CM/PCS terms. The 13.0 percent of terms classified as "Inexact" could also be used directly assuming some acceptable loss of clinical precision. The 11.9 percent of terms classified as "Model" represent differences that require rule-based mapping. The results of this study suggest that ICD-10-CM/PCS meets the intended design goal of increased clinical precision but studies are needed to precisely define the depth of coverage.

SNOMED CT 问题列表与 ICD-10-CM/PCS HIPAA 代码集的比较。
2013 年,美国将从使用《国际疾病分类,第九修订版,临床修正》(ICD-9-CM)转为使用《国际疾病分类,第十修订版,临床修正/程序编码系统》(ICD-10-CM/PCS)。本研究将美国国家医学图书馆编制的 2009 年 7 月《临床观察记录和编码》(CORE)问题列表子集中的约 5000 个术语与 2009 年 1 月版 ICD-10-CM/PCS 中的术语进行了比较。比对工作由一人完成,使用内部定义的 "精确"、"不精确"、"模型"(一个 SNOMED CT 术语对应多个 ICD-10-CM/PCS 术语)、"未在别处分类"、"未在别处指定"、"同义词 "和 "未找到 "等概念,根据匹配质量对核心问题清单术语进行分类。在核心问题清单术语中,6.0% 在 ICD-10-CM/PCS 中找不到,69.1% 有对应的 ICD-10-CM/PCS 术语。13.0%被归类为 "不精确 "的术语也可直接使用,但需假定临床精确度会有一些可接受的损失。11.9%的术语被归类为 "模型",这代表了需要基于规则映射的差异。本研究结果表明,ICD-10-CM/PCS 达到了提高临床精确度的预期设计目标,但还需要进行研究以精确定义覆盖深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Health Information Management is a scholarly, peer-reviewed research journal whose mission is to advance health information management practice and to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration between HIM professionals and others in disciplines supporting the advancement of the management of health information. The primary focus is to promote the linkage of practice, education, and research and to provide contributions to the understanding or improvement of health information management processes and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信